本文選題：等同原則　切入點(diǎn)：專利權(quán)　出處：《浙江大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：等同原則是判斷專利權(quán)邊界的一項(xiàng)重要但又非常模糊的原則。等同原則在國內(nèi)外還在不斷的發(fā)展變化中,到目前為止還未形成統(tǒng)一成熟的觀點(diǎn)和規(guī)則。然而該原則對于專利侵權(quán)判定又有著至關(guān)重要的作用。本文希望得出等同原則較為明確的適用標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。本文首先深入剖析專利等同原則的形成,從法理角度分析等同原則,對等同原則與權(quán)利要求解釋的關(guān)系以及專利授權(quán)的關(guān)系進(jìn)行研究,然后收集歸納國內(nèi)外對等同原則的適用和發(fā)展,得出等同原則的適用條件和范圍標(biāo)準(zhǔn),最后對等同原則的對立原則,禁止反悔原則、捐獻(xiàn)原則和全要件原則進(jìn)行辨析。本文從法理角度出發(fā),追根溯源,以期獲得符合立法本意的等同原則的適用規(guī)則。同時嘗試從專利審查授權(quán)角度分析專利等同的依據(jù)和范圍。嘗試將專利創(chuàng)造性高度因素納入等同適用的寬窄衡量規(guī)則中去。并從比較法上對國內(nèi)外等同原則的使用發(fā)展情況進(jìn)行分析。本文認(rèn)為,等同原則實(shí)際是為了保證社會公眾的根本利益,而讓渡部分社會公眾的短期利益,以確保專利權(quán)能得到有效保護(hù)。其實(shí)際意義在于,無需在公眾利益和專利權(quán)人利益中搖擺。在適用專利等同原則時,主要考慮權(quán)利的穩(wěn)定預(yù)期性和保護(hù)的實(shí)質(zhì)有效性兩個方面。
[Abstract]:The principle of equivalence is an important but very vague principle in judging the boundary of patent rights. The principle of equivalence is still developing and changing at home and abroad. Up to now, there has not been a unified and mature view and rule. However, this principle plays an important role in the adjudication of patent infringement. This paper hopes to come up with a clear applicable standard of the equivalence principle. Analysis of the formation of the principle of patent equivalence, This paper analyzes the principle of equivalence from the angle of jurisprudence, studies the relationship between the principle of equivalence and the interpretation of claims and the relationship of patent authorization, and then collects and summarizes the application and development of the principle of equivalence at home and abroad. Finally, the author distinguishes the principle of equivalence, the principle of estoppel, the principle of donation and the principle of all elements. At the same time, it tries to analyze the basis and scope of patent equivalence from the point of view of patent examination authorization. This paper analyzes the development of the application of the principle of equivalence at home and abroad from the point of view of comparative law. The principle of equivalence is actually intended to ensure the fundamental interests of the public, while the short-term interests of some members of the public are transferred to ensure that patents are effectively protected. There is no need to swing between the public interest and the interests of the patentee. In the application of the principle of patent equivalence, two aspects are considered, namely, the stable expectation of rights and the substantive effectiveness of protection.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：浙江大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D923.42

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 黨曉林;;從貢獻(xiàn)論分析功能性特征的司法保護(hù)范圍——功能性特征中的“等同”不應(yīng)該采用等同侵權(quán)判定原則中“等同”的判斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn)[J];專利代理;2016年03期

2 張曉陽;;等同特征判斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn)在專利侵權(quán)糾紛案件中的適用問題[J];專利代理;2016年01期

3 王，

本文編號：1678947