本文選題：附保護第三人作用合同　切入點：第三人范圍　出處：《廣東財經(jīng)大學》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：如何對合同外第三人進行保護一直以來是各國法律所重視的問題。在我國將責任劃分為合同責任和侵權(quán)責任的前提下,一般將合同外第三人納入侵權(quán)行為法的保護范圍。然而社會生活和司法實踐中,僅僅只靠侵權(quán)法來保護日益復雜的民事關(guān)系中的第三人已然不夠,那么能否通過其他途徑對合同外的第三人加以保護成為本文研究的問題�！奖Ｗo第三人作用合同制度’某種意義上,在我國法律對合同外第三人的保護不足問題的改善提供思路。這項制度的基本內(nèi)涵是,在債務人可預見范圍內(nèi),若存在一個特殊的第三人——即該第三人與合同債權(quán)人之間存在某種特殊關(guān)系,從而使債務人應對其負有照顧、保護、通知等附隨義務。產(chǎn)生這項義務的法理依據(jù)是合同法上的誠實信用原則。債務人合同行為的履行涉及第三人時,債務人根據(jù)誠信對第三人也應承擔等價于對債權(quán)人的注意義務;同時該制度同時也突破了合同相對性,使特定的合同關(guān)系包括保護第三人的功能。我國《合同法》第6條規(guī)定了誠實信用原則,同時也存在一些合同制度上對合同相對性原則的突破的情況,在理論基礎上,我國是有可以適用或者借鑒‘附保護第三人作用合同’制度的基礎的。在實際操作層面上分析,雖然借鑒‘附保護第三人作用合同制度’會模糊我國現(xiàn)行法律下合同責任和侵權(quán)責任的界限,但實踐中我國對責任競合的規(guī)定使違約責任和侵權(quán)責任有重合,若在所有情況下僅機械將所有合同外第三人遭受債務人合同行為的損害劃歸侵權(quán)法保護則會降低當事人得到救濟的可能性;其次,雖然借鑒該制度會不可避免的出現(xiàn)如何確定第三人的范圍的問題。本文認為,第三人范圍的確定一直是該制度不能完美解決的問題,用法律條文窮盡其范圍很困難,可以對合同法中相應條款進行擴張解釋來解決。另外‘附保護第三人作用合同制度’重點在于提供給合同外第三人以合同責任形式要求債務人承擔責任的權(quán)利,因此我國法律要借鑒的不是這個制度本身,而是為什么要構(gòu)建制度的目的。對于我國現(xiàn)行法律而言,更好的保護第三人的方式是賦予第三人自由選擇請求權(quán)的權(quán)利,使其根據(jù)案件本身和自己的情況及訴求去請求救濟,這種方式對當事人而言更為恰當,同時對我國對第三人的保護目的及法律適用彈性都有很大的意義。
[Abstract]:How to protect the third party outside the contract has always been an important issue in the national law. Under the premise of dividing the liability into contract liability and tort liability in our country, Generally, the third person outside the contract is brought into the protection scope of tort law. However, in social life and judicial practice, it is no longer enough to protect the third person in the increasingly complicated civil relations only by tort law. Well, whether or not the third party outside the contract can be protected through other means has become the problem studied in this paper. 'the contract system of the role of the third party attached to the protection of the third party' is in a sense. The basic connotation of this system is that, within the foreseeable scope of the debtor, the basic connotation of this system is that, If there is a special third party-that is, there is a special relationship between that third party and the creditor of the contract, so that the debtor should take care of and protect it, The legal basis of this obligation is the principle of good faith in contract law. When the performance of the debtor's contract involves a third party, the debtor should also bear the duty of care to the third party according to good faith. At the same time, the system also breaks through the relativity of contract, which makes the specific contractual relationship include the function of protecting the third party. Article 6 of the contract Law of our country stipulates the principle of good faith. At the same time, there are some breakthroughs in contract system to the principle of relativity of contract. On the basis of theory, our country can apply or draw lessons from the system of "protect the third party's role contract". Although drawing lessons from the contract system of "protect the third party's role" will blur the boundary between the contract liability and the tort liability under the current law of our country, but in practice our country's stipulation of the concurrence of the liability makes the liability of breach of contract and the liability of tort overlap. If, in all cases, only the damage to the third party other than the contract suffered by the debtor's contractual act is attributed to the protection of the tort law, the possibility of the party receiving relief will be reduced; secondly, Although the problem of how to determine the scope of the third party will inevitably arise from the system, this paper holds that the determination of the scope of the third party has always been a problem which cannot be solved perfectly by the system, and it is very difficult to exhaust its scope with legal provisions. In addition, the emphasis of the contract system is to provide the third party outside the contract with the right to require the debtor to assume liability in the form of contractual liability. Therefore, what the law of our country should learn from is not the system itself, but the purpose of constructing the system. As far as the current law of our country is concerned, the better way to protect the third party is to give the third party the right to freely choose the right of claim. It is more appropriate for the parties to apply for relief according to the case itself and their own circumstances and demands. At the same time, it is of great significance to the purpose of protection and the flexibility of the application of the law to the third party in our country.
【學位授予單位】：廣東財經(jīng)大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D923.6

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 康懷宇,殷馳;論我國合同制度的刑法保護[J];西南民族學院學報(哲學社會科學版);2001年05期

2 協(xié)鳴;;論合同制度[J];法學研究;1959年02期

3 ;人民公社化后合同制度中的幾個問題[J];法學研究;1959年04期

4 金平;;充分發(fā)揮經(jīng)濟合同制度在四化建設中的作用[J];現(xiàn)代法學;1980年01期

5 崔勤之;試論我國經(jīng)濟合同制度的特點、作用及法律責任[J];學習與思考(中國社會科學院研究生院學報);1981年06期

6 鄭成思;;對現(xiàn)代合同制度再認識的三次升級[J];法學家;1999年03期

7 呂忠梅;論合同制度的生態(tài)化拓展[J];河南師范大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2004年05期

8 劉凱湘,姚明;論標準合同的意義、缺陷與完善對策[J];北京商學院學報;1997年05期

9 趙培吉;;能源合同制度構(gòu)建的法律基礎芻議[J];佳木斯教育學院學報;2014年02期

10 楊德橋;;論合同制度的生存邏輯[J];職業(yè)圈;2007年24期

相關(guān)會議論文 前2條

1 呂忠梅;;論合同制度的生態(tài)化拓展[A];林業(yè)、森林與野生動植物資源保護法制建設研究——2004年中國環(huán)境資源法學研討會（年會）論文集（第四冊）[C];2004年

2 呂忠梅;劉長興;;構(gòu)建環(huán)境合同制度[A];適應市場機制的環(huán)境法制建設問題研究——2002年中國環(huán)境資源法學研討會論文集（上冊）[C];2002年

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前2條

1 記者 張為真　彭琰;合同制度更加完善 欠薪事件受到抑制[N];深圳商報;2010年

2 西山煤電集團公司工會 袁莉;淺談女工家屬在煤礦安全生產(chǎn)中怎樣發(fā)揮作用[N];山西經(jīng)濟日報;2010年

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前5條

1 李亦雯;附保護第三人作用合同制度研究[D];廣東財經(jīng)大學;2015年

2 鄭方榮;環(huán)境保護與合同制度的生態(tài)化[D];山東師范大學;2008年

3 周培萍;環(huán)境合同制度構(gòu)建探析[D];中國政法大學;2010年

4 鐘戈;終身定期金合同制度探析[D];西南政法大學;2011年

5 魏崴;論批量合同制度[D];外交學院;2013年

，

本文編號：1673322