本文選題：政府信息公開　切入點(diǎn)：司法經(jīng)驗(yàn)　出處：《安徽師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會科學(xué)版)》2017年01期

【摘要】：隱私概念的不確定性給行政機(jī)關(guān)判斷相關(guān)信息是否應(yīng)當(dāng)公開帶來了困難。我國的行政訴訟中往往通過當(dāng)事人的公開意愿、公開行為、社會一般的認(rèn)知、對隱私權(quán)人的不利影響等因素來判斷相關(guān)信息是否屬于個人隱私。公開申請人是密切的利害關(guān)系人、公開的利益優(yōu)于不公開的利益、法律強(qiáng)制公開這三種情形構(gòu)成了隱私保護(hù)的例外。通過對司法經(jīng)驗(yàn)的整理,行政機(jī)關(guān)可以通過強(qiáng)制公開的法律規(guī)定、申請人的資格、當(dāng)事人的意愿、社會的一般認(rèn)知以及利益衡量等五個步驟的審查來確認(rèn)是否給予相關(guān)信息以隱私權(quán)的保護(hù)。
[Abstract]:The uncertainty of the concept of privacy makes it difficult for the administrative organs to judge whether the relevant information should be made public. In our administrative litigation, it is often through the public will of the parties, the public behavior, and the general cognition of the society. Factors such as the adverse influence on the privacy person to judge whether the relevant information belongs to personal privacy. The public applicant is a close interested party, and the public interest is superior to the private interest. The three situations of compulsory disclosure by law constitute an exception to the protection of privacy. Through the collation of judicial experience, the administrative organ may pass the compulsory disclosure of the law, the qualifications of the applicant, the will of the parties, The general cognition of society and the evaluation of benefits are examined to confirm whether the relevant information should be protected by the right of privacy.
【作者單位】： 上海行政學(xué)院公共管理教研部;
【基金】：國家社會科學(xué)基金青年項(xiàng)目(14CFX063)
【分類號】：D63;D923
，

本文編號：1666280