本文選題：美國(guó)遺囑繼承　切入點(diǎn)：法律適用　出處：《遼寧大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著國(guó)際化進(jìn)程的不斷深入,跨國(guó)民商事往來日益頻繁,各國(guó)公民在外國(guó)擁有財(cái)產(chǎn)成為常態(tài),隨之而來的跨國(guó)遺囑繼承案件也日益增加。跨國(guó)遺囑繼承通常會(huì)涉及到兩個(gè)或更多國(guó)家的法律適用問題,適用不同的法律可能會(huì)出現(xiàn)不同的遺囑繼承結(jié)果,對(duì)當(dāng)事人權(quán)利有著很大的影響,因此,有關(guān)遺囑繼承法律適用的問題是值得關(guān)注并進(jìn)行深入研究的。對(duì)此問題的研究可以減少日后的法律沖突,推動(dòng)國(guó)際間的交流與合作。美國(guó)是遺囑繼承制度比較發(fā)達(dá)的國(guó)家之一,對(duì)遺囑繼承的相關(guān)規(guī)定比較成熟和具體。另外美國(guó)是聯(lián)邦制國(guó)家,各州之間也存在著法律沖突問題,相比其他國(guó)家而言,遺囑繼承的法律沖突在美國(guó)更具復(fù)雜性。因此,筆者將通過對(duì)美國(guó)遺囑繼承法律適用規(guī)則的分析,進(jìn)而提出對(duì)中國(guó)遺囑繼承法律適用的建議。文章的第一部分是對(duì)美國(guó)遺囑繼承法律適用制度的概述,目的是讓大家對(duì)美國(guó)遺囑繼承法律適用問題有一定的理解;第二部分從美國(guó)國(guó)內(nèi)法律沖突和美國(guó)與其他國(guó)家法律沖突兩部分進(jìn)行論述,美國(guó)國(guó)內(nèi)沖突部分以《統(tǒng)一遺囑檢驗(yàn)法典》、《路易斯安娜州民法典》和其他州法中關(guān)于遺囑繼承的不同規(guī)定為分析對(duì)象,與其他國(guó)家的法律沖突部分主要以遺囑能力、遺囑方式、遺囑撤銷的不同規(guī)定進(jìn)行分析,希望以此幫助大家了解美國(guó)遺囑繼承法律沖突的復(fù)雜;文章的第三部分是美國(guó)遺囑繼承法律適用規(guī)則,這一部分主要講述了美國(guó)遺囑繼承法律適用的規(guī)定,分析其中的合理性,找出值得中國(guó)借鑒的規(guī)則;文章的第四部分是對(duì)中國(guó)遺囑繼承法律適用現(xiàn)狀的分析,提出美國(guó)遺囑繼承法律適用對(duì)中國(guó)的立法啟示,并進(jìn)行論述。美國(guó)解決遺囑繼承法律沖突所適用的原則包括“意思自治原則”和“最密切聯(lián)系原則”。在中國(guó)遺囑繼承法律適用的問題上應(yīng)用最密切聯(lián)系原則,進(jìn)一步擴(kuò)大法官自由裁量權(quán),促進(jìn)遺囑繼承的有效成立,能夠最大程度地符合立遺囑人對(duì)財(cái)產(chǎn)分配的預(yù)期。加強(qiáng)意思自治原則的應(yīng)用也是為了推動(dòng)遺囑繼承的發(fā)展,減少因?yàn)榉梢?guī)定不同而產(chǎn)生的適用沖突,促進(jìn)不同地區(qū)和國(guó)家間個(gè)人財(cái)產(chǎn)的有序、順利轉(zhuǎn)移。
[Abstract]:With the deepening of the internationalization process, transnational civil and commercial exchanges become more and more frequent, and the property owned by the citizens of various countries in foreign countries becomes the norm. Transnational testamentary succession cases are also increasing. Transnational testamentary succession usually involves the application of the law of two or more countries, and the application of different laws may result in different testamentary succession. It has a great influence on the rights of the parties. Therefore, the application of the law of testate succession is worthy of attention and in-depth study. The study of this issue can reduce the conflict of laws in the future. Promoting international exchanges and cooperation. The United States is one of the more developed countries in the testate succession system, and the relevant provisions on testate succession are more mature and specific. In addition, the United States is a federal country, and there is also a conflict of laws between the states. Compared with other countries, the conflict of laws on testate succession is more complicated in the United States. Therefore, the author will analyze the applicable rules of testate succession law in the United States. The first part of the article is an overview of the application of the law of testate succession in the United States, the purpose is to let everyone have a certain understanding of the application of the law of testate succession in the United States; The second part discusses the conflict of laws in the United States and the conflict between the United States and other countries. The part of the internal conflict in the United States is based on the uniform probate Code, the Civil Code of An Na State of Louis and the different provisions on testamentary succession in the laws of other states, while the conflict part of the laws of other countries is mainly in the form of testamentary capacity and testamentary means. In order to help us understand the complexity of the conflicts of laws on testamentary succession in the United States, the third part of this paper is the applicable rules of the law of testate succession in the United States. This part mainly describes the provisions of the application of the law of testate succession in the United States, analyzes the rationality of it, and finds out the rules worthy of reference by China. The fourth part of the article is an analysis of the current situation of the application of the law of testate succession in China. The legislative implications of the application of testamentary succession laws in the United States to China are put forward. The principles applicable to the settlement of conflicts of laws on testamentary succession in the United States include the principle of autonomy of will and the principle of closest connection, and the application of the principle of closest connection to the application of the law of testate succession in China, Further expanding the discretion of judges and promoting the effective establishment of testamentary succession can meet the expectations of the testator for the distribution of property to the greatest extent, and strengthen the application of the principle of autonomy of will in order to promote the development of testamentary succession, To reduce the conflict of application caused by different laws and regulations, and to promote the orderly and smooth transfer of personal property between different regions and countries.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D971.2;DD913

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李雪琦;;論意思自治原則在涉外遺囑繼承領(lǐng)域的適用[J];法制博覽;2016年10期

2 葉竹梅;;《涉外民事關(guān)系法律適用法》中的意思自治[J];西部法學(xué)評(píng)論;2015年02期

3 周銀;宋瑞;李昕;徐一權(quán);;論遺囑自由的法律限度[J];法制與社會(huì);2015年11期

4 王桂玲;;美國(guó)遺囑撤銷制度及其對(duì)我國(guó)的立法啟示[J];法學(xué)論壇;2014年06期

5 張妍;;論我國(guó)涉外遺囑繼承法律適用之規(guī)定[J];法制與社會(huì);2014年25期

6 郭彩汾;;論遺囑自由之限制[J];知識(shí)經(jīng)濟(jì);2013年20期

7 徐偉功;;法律選擇中的意思自治原則在我國(guó)的運(yùn)用[J];法學(xué);2013年09期

8 屈茂輝;沈潔;;我國(guó)繼承法修改的幾個(gè)疑難問題研討[J];法治研究;2013年05期

9 李宏;;遺囑繼承制度的價(jià)值悖論——兼論我國(guó)《繼承法》遺囑自由的合理定位[J];吉首大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2013年02期

10 李宏;;西方遺囑繼承理念變遷及規(guī)律[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2010年05期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 章瑋雅;涉外遺囑繼承法律適用原則問題研究[D];南京大學(xué);2016年

2 呂露露;涉外遺囑法律適用規(guī)則的立法及其完善[D];安徽大學(xué);2016年

3 朱玉瑾;論意思自治原則在涉外親屬關(guān)系中的適用[D];蘇州大學(xué);2016年

4 張志雪;涉外遺囑繼承法律適用問題研究[D];河北經(jīng)貿(mào)大學(xué);2015年

5 杜U，

本文編號(hào)：1656811