兩大法系民法誠信原則研究
發(fā)布時間:2018-03-22 23:42
本文選題:兩大法系 切入點:民法 出處:《陜西師范大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文 論文類型:學(xué)位論文
【摘要】:誠信原則在兩大法系國家因為歷史傳統(tǒng)及發(fā)展進(jìn)程的不同,其最后的法律地位也很不同。在大陸法系國家,誠信原則在德國整個法律體系中處于支配地位。誠信原則在法國早期處于有名無實的地位,但是近年來其在立法上正擴(kuò)大誠信原則的適用,且其司法中有關(guān)于誠信原則大量適用的成功經(jīng)驗。在英美法系國家,英國立法上雖未明文統(tǒng)一規(guī)定誠信原則,但其許多部門法中規(guī)定有誠信原則,且司法中卻形成了大量適用誠信原則的判例體系。美國在其立法中對誠信原則作了規(guī)定,主要集中在民商事條文中規(guī)定,并且成功運(yùn)用于解決司法中的案例,也形成了獨(dú)特的誠信原則判例體系。英美法系國家開始借鑒大陸法系國家誠信原則在立法上的成功經(jīng)驗。我國的誠信原則研究從20世紀(jì)90年代開始,前期研究主要集中在民法和民事訴訟法領(lǐng)域。隨著研究的深入,學(xué)者們開始對誠信原則在刑法、行政法等方面的理論和司法適用進(jìn)行研究?傮w來說,我國的誠信原則理論研究還不夠深入,立法實踐和司法適用還需要完善。全文一共分為五個部分:第一部分主要是對兩大法系誠信原則的詞源、歷史發(fā)展及法律地位等進(jìn)行概括性的研究。在不同法系的國家,誠信原則總是會適應(yīng)國情和國家需要得到發(fā)展,正因為各自發(fā)展歷程有差別,決定了誠信原則在其國家歷史地位的不同。第二部分主要對民法誠信原則在兩大法系國家的內(nèi)涵進(jìn)行比較研究。只有明確了誠信原則在兩大法系國家的內(nèi)涵和本質(zhì),誠信原則才能準(zhǔn)確運(yùn)用,更好地平衡當(dāng)事人雙方的利益和社會一般公共利益。遺憾的是,不管是在大陸法系國家還是英美法系國家,誠信原則的內(nèi)涵和本質(zhì)都存在爭議;第三部分主要對民法誠信原則在兩大法系國家的立法實踐進(jìn)行研究。第四部分主要對民法誠信原則在兩大法系國家的司法適用情況進(jìn)行研究。第五部分主要是通過民法誠信原則在兩大法系的理論、立法和司法研究,以期對我國誠信原則產(chǎn)生積極的理論、立法和司法借鑒意義。
[Abstract]:The final legal status of the principle of good faith in the countries of the two major legal systems is also very different because of the differences in historical traditions and development processes. The principle of good faith is in the dominant position in the whole German legal system. The principle of good faith was in a nominal position in the early days of France, but in recent years it is expanding the application of the principle of good faith in legislation. In the common law system countries, although the principle of good faith is not explicitly and uniformly stipulated in British legislation, it is stipulated in many branch laws of the United Kingdom that there is the principle of good faith. The United States has stipulated the principle of good faith in its legislation, which is mainly concentrated in the provisions of civil and commercial provisions, and has been successfully applied to solve cases in the administration of justice. The common law countries began to learn from the successful experience of the civil law countries in the legislation of the principle of good faith. The study of the principle of good faith in our country began in the 1990s. Previous studies mainly focused on the fields of civil law and civil procedure law. With the deepening of the research, scholars began to study the theory and judicial application of the principle of good faith in criminal law, administrative law and so on. Generally speaking, The theoretical research on the principle of good faith in our country is not deep enough, and the legislative practice and judicial application still need to be perfected. The whole paper is divided into five parts: the first part is mainly about the etymology of the principle of good faith in the two legal systems. Historical development and legal status are generally studied. In countries with different legal systems, the principle of good faith is always adapted to the national conditions and needs of the country. The second part makes a comparative study on the connotation of the principle of good faith in the countries of the two legal systems. Only the connotation and essence of the principle of good faith in the countries of the two legal systems are clearly defined. The principle of good faith can be used accurately and balance the interests of both parties and the general public interests of the society. Unfortunately, the connotation and essence of the principle of good faith are controversial in the countries of civil law system and common law system. The third part mainly studies the legislative practice of the principle of good faith of civil law in the countries of the two legal systems. The fourth part mainly studies the judicial application of the principle of good faith of civil law in the countries of the two legal systems. The fifth part is mainly about the general application of the principle of good faith in the civil law. The theory of the principle of good faith in civil law in the two legal systems, The research of legislation and judicature is expected to produce positive theoretical, legislative and judicial reference significance to the principle of good faith in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:陜西師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2015
【分類號】:D913
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條
1 劉建賢;樸正哲;;客觀誠信與主觀誠信在立法中統(tǒng)一的問題探析[J];法制與社會;2007年04期
2 張家慧;;當(dāng)事人訴訟行為與誠實信用原則[J];訴訟法論叢;2001年00期
3 徐國棟;英語世界中的誠信原則[J];環(huán)球法律評論;2004年03期
,本文編號:1650959
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/1650959.html
最近更新
教材專著