發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-03-09 04:12

  本文選題：云計(jì)算　切入點(diǎn)：信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)　出處：《海南大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：云計(jì)算技術(shù)作為一項(xiàng)新興的技術(shù),對(duì)于信息產(chǎn)業(yè)的影響越來越大。隨之而來的是不同于以往的信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)侵權(quán)模式和行為。面對(duì)這些新出現(xiàn)的問題,傳統(tǒng)的法律已經(jīng)無法進(jìn)行徹底的規(guī)制,法律的滯后性導(dǎo)致的矛盾也愈發(fā)突出和激烈。正是基于這一現(xiàn)狀,本文從云計(jì)算的定義與特點(diǎn)出發(fā),試圖對(duì)云計(jì)算服務(wù)下的信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)侵權(quán)責(zé)任認(rèn)定問題進(jìn)行討論。 首先,本文分別介紹了云計(jì)算及信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)的概念和特征。明確了云計(jì)算及信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)的概念和特征,有助于我們進(jìn)一步討論云計(jì)算下信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)的侵權(quán)責(zé)任認(rèn)定問題。 其次,對(duì)于云計(jì)算下信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)侵權(quán)責(zé)任認(rèn)定的現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行了分析。結(jié)合云計(jì)算的特點(diǎn),分別對(duì)云計(jì)算服務(wù)用戶侵權(quán)責(zé)任認(rèn)定、云計(jì)算服務(wù)運(yùn)營商侵權(quán)責(zé)任認(rèn)定、云計(jì)算用戶與運(yùn)營商聯(lián)合侵權(quán)責(zé)任認(rèn)定問題進(jìn)行了分析。在這些分析的基礎(chǔ)上,引出了下文對(duì)云計(jì)算服務(wù)下信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)侵權(quán)責(zé)任認(rèn)定存在的問題的討論。 再次,討論了云計(jì)算下信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)侵權(quán)責(zé)任認(rèn)定存在的問題：信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)侵權(quán)主體不明、信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)侵權(quán)責(zé)任認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)不清、臨時(shí)存儲(chǔ)侵權(quán)責(zé)任認(rèn)定觀點(diǎn)存在分歧、軟件出租侵權(quán)責(zé)任不明確。這些問題看似復(fù)雜,歸根結(jié)底還是由于云計(jì)算的特殊性造成的。 最后,針對(duì)云計(jì)算下信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)侵權(quán)責(zé)任認(rèn)定存在的問題,在之前分析的基礎(chǔ)上,提出了幾點(diǎn)建議：明確云計(jì)算下信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)侵權(quán)主體,明確云計(jì)算下信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)侵權(quán)責(zé)任認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn),明確云計(jì)算下臨時(shí)存儲(chǔ)侵權(quán)責(zé)任,明確云計(jì)算下軟件出租侵權(quán)責(zé)任。希望這些建議能夠?qū)υ朴?jì)算環(huán)境下信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)的侵權(quán)責(zé)任認(rèn)定問題有所幫助。
[Abstract]:Cloud computing technology, as a new technology, has more and more influence on the information industry. The traditional law has been unable to regulate thoroughly, and the contradiction caused by the lag of the law has become increasingly prominent and fierce. It is precisely based on this situation, this paper starts from the definition and characteristics of cloud computing. This paper attempts to discuss the problem of tort liability of information network communication right under cloud computing service. First of all, this paper introduces the concept and characteristics of cloud computing and information network communication right, and clarifies the concept and characteristics of cloud computing and information network communication right. It is helpful for us to further discuss the problem of tort liability of information network communication right under cloud computing. Secondly, this paper analyzes the status quo of tort liability of information network communication right under cloud computing. Combined with the characteristics of cloud computing, the author respectively determines the tort liability of cloud computing service users and cloud computing service operators. On the basis of these analysis, this paper leads to the discussion of the problems in the identification of tort liability of information network communication right under cloud computing service. Thirdly, the paper discusses the problems existing in the identification of tort liability of information network communication right under cloud computing: the subject of information network communication right infringement is unclear, and the standard of information network communication right tort liability determination is not clear. There are differences of opinion on tort liability of temporary storage and unclear liability of software rental tort. These problems seem to be complicated, but in the final analysis, they are caused by the particularity of cloud computing. Finally, aiming at the problems existing in the identification of tort liability of information network communication right under cloud computing, on the basis of previous analysis, this paper puts forward several suggestions: make clear the subject of infringing information network communication right under cloud computing. Define the standard of tort liability of information network communication right under cloud computing, clarify the tort liability of temporary storage under cloud computing, Make clear the tort liability of software rental under cloud computing. I hope these suggestions can help to identify the tort liability of information network communication right in cloud computing environment.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：海南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D923.41

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉春霖;孫靈娜;;中美網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供商侵犯著作權(quán)責(zé)任比較研究[J];電子科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社科版);2009年06期

2 蘭曉為;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)侵權(quán)主體——“網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者”之解讀[J];大連海事大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年04期

3 梁志文;;論第三方責(zé)任的合法性基礎(chǔ)——以版權(quán)法之公共政策為視角的分析[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2007年04期

4 陳明濤;;技術(shù)提供商的版權(quán)責(zé)任分析及立法建議——由優(yōu)朋普樂訴TCL一案引發(fā)的思考[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2010年01期

5 梁志文;;我國法上的避風(fēng)港規(guī)則:利益失衡與立法完善[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2011年09期

6 叢立先;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)版權(quán)侵權(quán)行為構(gòu)成要件探論[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2007年05期

7 梁志文;;云計(jì)算、技術(shù)中立與版權(quán)責(zé)任[J];法學(xué);2011年03期

8 梁志文;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者的著作權(quán)責(zé)任:文本解釋與比較分析[J];法治研究;2011年02期

9 張欽坤;;云計(jì)算、開放平臺(tái)與服務(wù)商版權(quán)責(zé)任[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2012年12期

10 馮曉青;;著作權(quán)法的利益平衡理論研究[J];湖南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年06期

，

本文編號(hào)：1586928