本文選題：占有之訴　切入點(diǎn)：確認(rèn)之訴　出處：《昆明理工大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：占有之訴是占有保護(hù)在程序上的體現(xiàn),是占有在《物權(quán)法》保護(hù)上延伸,也是民事訴訟中的熱點(diǎn)和難點(diǎn)問題。占有之訴可以追溯到羅馬法時(shí)期,在近現(xiàn)代國家中也普通適用。目前我國關(guān)于物權(quán)的主要訴訟類型,是關(guān)于確認(rèn)物權(quán)是否存在的“確認(rèn)之訴”。關(guān)于物權(quán)的訴訟案由在《民事案件案由規(guī)定》中,規(guī)定的是所有權(quán)、用益物權(quán)和擔(dān)保物權(quán)確認(rèn)糾紛這三類,這類糾紛的解決往往成為解決其他物權(quán)糾紛的前提。而對(duì)于占有,就其訴訟保護(hù)而言,理論上和實(shí)體法上主要規(guī)定和探討的是占有人的占有物返還、排除妨害、排除妨害、消除妨害危險(xiǎn)等幾種請(qǐng)求權(quán)訴訟。占有事實(shí)往往是占有人尋求保護(hù)時(shí)需要證明的前提和內(nèi)容,沒必要進(jìn)行“確認(rèn)之訴”,而且“確認(rèn)之訴”證明的程序繁瑣。另外在我國程序法中還沒有專門關(guān)于占有的訴訟程序,因此為了更好的解決我國種類繁多的占有糾紛,我國需要在程序上確立相應(yīng)的占有之訴。本文由導(dǎo)論、正文、結(jié)論三部分組成。其中導(dǎo)論部分主要交代了本文選題的研究意義、國內(nèi)外研究現(xiàn)狀以及研究方法,結(jié)論則是對(duì)整篇文章的主要內(nèi)容進(jìn)行概括。正文由以下四部分組成:第一部分是占有之訴的基本理論界定。其中占有之訴的概念包括占有之訴的廣義和狹義的含義,占有之訴的相關(guān)制度是從占有之訴與本權(quán)之訴、占有之訴與侵權(quán)之訴和假處分制度來寫的。這幾個(gè)制度與占有之訴密切相關(guān),有必要明確占有之訴與這些制度的關(guān)系。第二部分是占有之訴的歷史演變及啟示。本文從占有之訴的歷史淵源入手,分析了羅馬法和日耳曼法時(shí)期的占有之訴,占有之訴的歷史悠久,早在羅馬時(shí)就已出現(xiàn)。占有之訴從羅馬法和日耳曼法慢慢演變成近現(xiàn)代國家的占有之訴,包括德國、法國、日本和臺(tái)灣地區(qū)等,這些國家對(duì)于占有之訴都有比較成熟的規(guī)定,本部分通過對(duì)這些國家的的占有之訴理論及實(shí)踐進(jìn)行分析研究,以從正面更好的指導(dǎo)我國占有之訴的適用。第三部分闡述了占有之訴在我國設(shè)立的理論意義和實(shí)踐價(jià)值。其中理論意義主要體現(xiàn)保護(hù)占有的簡便和快捷,無需借助本權(quán)保護(hù)以及可以保障占有人的訴權(quán)等方面進(jìn)行闡述。實(shí)踐價(jià)值是從我國現(xiàn)實(shí)生活中存在的占有保護(hù)出現(xiàn)的問題、司法對(duì)占有保護(hù)的現(xiàn)狀方面以及我國設(shè)立占有之訴的可行性等反面進(jìn)論證,分析了我國占有不能得到及時(shí)保護(hù)及目前我國占有保護(hù)需要借助本權(quán)保護(hù),而證明本權(quán)極其繁瑣和艱難這一現(xiàn)狀。第四部分闡述了占有之訴構(gòu)建的初步構(gòu)想。這一部分探討并明晰了占有之訴的當(dāng)事人、占有之訴的管轄、占有之訴的舉證責(zé)任、抗辯、占有之訴的適用程序和占有之訴中的反訴等占有之訴中的主要問題。期望通過這一系列制度設(shè)立可以推動(dòng)我國在程序法上對(duì)我國占有保護(hù)的完善,盡早把占有之訴這一制度納入我國民事訴訟法。
[Abstract]:The action of possession is the embodiment of the protection of possession in procedure, the extension of possession in the protection of property law, and also the hot and difficult issue in civil litigation. The action of possession can be traced back to the Roman law period. At present, the main types of litigation about real right in our country are "the action of confirmation" about the existence of real right. The cause of action on real right is stipulated in the "Civil case case provision", which stipulates the ownership right. There are three types of disputes: usufructuary right and security right. The settlement of this kind of dispute is often the premise of resolving other real right disputes. As for possession, as far as its litigation protection is concerned, In theory and substantive law, the main provisions and discussions are the return of the possessor's possession, the elimination of obstruction, the elimination of obstruction, The fact of possession is often the prerequisite and content to be proved when the possessor is seeking protection. There is no need for a "suit of confirmation", and the procedure for proof of a "suit of confirmation" is cumbersome. In addition, there is no specific procedure for possession in the procedural law of our country, so in order to better resolve the various types of possession disputes in our country, This paper consists of three parts: introduction, text and conclusion. Among them, the introduction mainly explains the significance of the research on this topic, the domestic and foreign research status and the research methods. The conclusion is to summarize the main content of the whole article. The text consists of the following four parts: the first part is the definition of the basic theory of the action of possession, in which the concept of the action of possession includes the broad sense and narrow meaning of the action of possession. The relevant system of possession action is written from possession action and original right action, possession action and tort action and false disposition system. These systems are closely related to possession action. It is necessary to clarify the relationship between possession action and these systems. The second part is the historical evolution and enlightenment of possession action. The action of possession has a long history and has appeared since as early as Rome. It has evolved from Roman law and Germanic law to modern and modern countries, including Germany, France, Japan and Taiwan, etc. These countries have relatively mature provisions for possession action. This part analyzes and studies the theory and practice of possession action in these countries. The third part expounds the theoretical significance and practical value of possession action in China, in which the theoretical meaning mainly reflects the simplicity and rapidity of the protection of possession. There is no need to use the protection of this right and the protection of the possessor's right of action, etc. The practical value is a problem arising from the protection of possession in the real life of our country. On the present situation of judicial possession protection and the feasibility of establishing possession action in China, the author analyzes that China's possession cannot be protected in time and that China's possession protection needs to be protected with the help of this right at present. In the 4th part, the author expounds the initial conception of the construction of the possession action. This part discusses and clarifies the parties, jurisdiction, burden of proof and defense of the possession action. The main problems in possession action, such as the applicable procedure of possession action and the counterclaim in possession action, are expected to promote the perfection of our country's possession protection in procedural law through the establishment of this series of systems. As soon as possible, the possession of the system into our civil procedure law.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：昆明理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D923.2

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 關(guān)玉崢;我國民法應(yīng)明確設(shè)立占有之訴制度[J];南都學(xué)壇;2004年04期

2 張喻忻;胡海濱;;論占有訴訟制度在我國的構(gòu)建[J];人民論壇;2010年08期

3 章正璋;;無權(quán)占有和間接占有的兩個(gè)基本問題——與李錫鶴教授商榷[J];學(xué)術(shù)界;2014年02期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 張 克;設(shè)立占有之訴制度的構(gòu)想[N];人民法院報(bào);2002年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 王曉潔;論占有之訴[D];昆明理工大學(xué);2017年

2 吳冰;論占有的物權(quán)法保護(hù)[D];鄭州大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號(hào)：1585506