本文選題：微信公眾平臺　切入點：著作權(quán)　出處：《河北經(jīng)貿(mào)大學(xué)》2016年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：2014年9月3日,國內(nèi)首例微信公眾平臺著作權(quán)侵權(quán)案在廣東省中山市第一人民法院審結(jié)。法院認為,被告微信公眾號“最潮中山”未經(jīng)許可擅自將原告微信公眾號“中山商房網(wǎng)”享有著作權(quán)的作品在微信公眾平臺上進行轉(zhuǎn)載的行為構(gòu)成對原告署名權(quán)、修改權(quán)和信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)及獲得報酬權(quán)的侵犯,應(yīng)當承擔賠禮道歉、賠償損失等侵權(quán)責任。微信公眾平臺著作權(quán)侵權(quán)問題也隨之成為人們熱議的話題,對微信公眾平臺的作品傳播行為進行規(guī)范,明確微信公眾平臺對著作權(quán)人的責任義務(wù)勢在必行。引發(fā)微信公眾平臺著作權(quán)爭議有兩方面的原因,一方面是由于對微信公眾平臺的作品傳播行為認識不足,導(dǎo)致對微信公眾平臺著作權(quán)侵權(quán)的認定存在分歧;另一方面是因為我國《著作權(quán)法》所規(guī)定的免責事由對微信公眾平臺不盡適用,使得侵權(quán)責任的承擔也處于不確定的狀態(tài)。本文通過研究總結(jié)微信公眾平臺的服務(wù)性質(zhì)和注意義務(wù),在分析案例、尋求實證的基礎(chǔ)上討論微信公眾平臺作品的性質(zhì)及其權(quán)利歸屬,從而找出微信公眾平臺著作權(quán)侵權(quán)認定的方法和理論依據(jù)。本文共分為五部分:第一部分,闡述了本文的選題背景與意義、研究方法與創(chuàng)新點以及微信公眾平臺著作權(quán)侵權(quán)問題研究的國內(nèi)外現(xiàn)狀等。第二部分,從微信公眾平臺的發(fā)展歷程入手,指出微信公眾平臺對現(xiàn)代著作權(quán)法的挑戰(zhàn)。以廣東首例微信公眾平臺著作權(quán)侵權(quán)案為例,闡述了保護微信公眾平臺作品著作權(quán)的意義。第三部分,探究了微信公眾平臺發(fā)布內(nèi)容是否屬于作品而受著作權(quán)法保護以及作品權(quán)利歸屬的問題,并對微信公眾平臺中大量存在的孤兒作品的權(quán)利歸屬展開了討論。第四部分,從侵權(quán)行為的四個構(gòu)成要件展開討論,總結(jié)了微信公眾平臺作品著作權(quán)侵權(quán)行為的認定標準和許可使用、合理使用等例外情形。第五部分,闡明微信公眾平臺對著作權(quán)人的責任義務(wù),針對現(xiàn)階段微信公眾平臺在面對著作權(quán)侵權(quán)問題時采取對策的不足,分析得出對微信公眾平臺加強作品著作權(quán)保護的建議。希望通過本文對微信公眾平臺著作權(quán)侵權(quán)問題的探索,能夠引起相關(guān)領(lǐng)域?qū)＜业闹匾?讓更多的人關(guān)注微信公眾平臺作品的著作權(quán)保護。
[Abstract]:In September 3rd 2014, the first WeChat public platform copyright infringement case was concluded in the first people's Court of Zhongshan City, Guangdong Province. The court held that. The defendant Official account's "most popular Zhongshan" act of reprinting the copyrighted works of the plaintiff Official account's "Zhongshan Commercial Housing Network" on WeChat's public platform without permission constitutes a right to the plaintiff's signature. The infringement of the right to modify, the right to spread information on the Internet and the right to receive remuneration should be subject to tort liability such as apology and compensation for losses. The issue of copyright infringement on WeChat's public platform has also become a hot topic for discussion. It is imperative to standardize the work dissemination behavior of WeChat public platform, and make clear the responsibility obligation of WeChat public platform to the copyright owner. There are two reasons that cause the copyright dispute of WeChat public platform. On the one hand, due to the lack of understanding of WeChat public platform works dissemination behavior, resulting in the copyright infringement of WeChat public platform, there are differences; On the other hand, it is because the reasons for exemption stipulated in the copyright Law of China are not applicable to the WeChat public platform. This paper summarizes the service nature and duty of care of WeChat public platform, and analyzes the case. In order to find out the methods and theoretical basis of copyright infringement on WeChat public platform, this paper is divided into five parts: the first part, This paper expounds the background and significance of this paper, the research methods and innovation points, as well as the status quo of the research on copyright infringement of WeChat public platform at home and abroad. The second part, starting with the development of WeChat public platform, This paper points out the challenge of WeChat public platform to modern copyright law. Taking the first WeChat public platform copyright infringement case in Guangdong as an example, this paper expounds the significance of protecting the copyright of WeChat public platform works. This paper probes into whether the content published by WeChat public platform belongs to the works and is protected by copyright law, and discusses the ownership of the rights of a large number of orphans' works in the WeChat public platform. Part 4th, This paper discusses the four constitutive elements of tort, summarizes the standard of copyright infringement of WeChat public platform and the exceptional cases such as permission, reasonable use and so on. Part 5th, Expound the responsibility and obligation of WeChat public platform to copyright owner, aiming at the deficiency of taking countermeasures when WeChat public platform is faced with copyright infringement at present. Through the analysis of WeChat public platform to strengthen the copyright protection of works. Through this article to explore the issue of copyright infringement of WeChat public platform, can cause the attention of relevant experts in the field, Let more people pay attention to the copyright protection of WeChat Public platform works.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河北經(jīng)貿(mào)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號】：D923.41

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 呂炳斌;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)版權(quán)避風港規(guī)則的發(fā)展趨向[J];中國出版;2015年23期

2 鄭悅;;淺論網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供商的網(wǎng)絡(luò)版權(quán)侵權(quán)[J];法制博覽;2015年32期

3 楊延超;;與微信平臺有關(guān)的著作權(quán)問題研究[J];知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2015年08期

4 蔡元臻;;新媒體時代著作權(quán)法定許可制度的完善——以“今日頭條”事件為切入點[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報);2015年04期

5 王春梅;;微信公眾號傳播他人作品行為性質(zhì)辨析[J];法學(xué)論壇;2015年03期

6 管育鷹;;我國著作權(quán)法定許可制度的反思與重構(gòu)[J];華東政法大學(xué)學(xué)報;2015年02期

7 鞏昱坤;張萍;;社交網(wǎng)絡(luò)平臺中數(shù)字版權(quán)保護的分析[J];吉林工程技術(shù)師范學(xué)院學(xué)報;2015年01期

8 阮開欣;;著作權(quán)侵權(quán)的歸責原則研究——對《美國版權(quán)法》的反思及其對我國的啟示[J];知識產(chǎn)權(quán)法研究;2014年01期

9 熊琦;;互聯(lián)網(wǎng)產(chǎn)業(yè)驅(qū)動下的著作權(quán)規(guī)則變革[J];中國法學(xué);2013年06期

10 吳漢東;;試論知識產(chǎn)權(quán)限制的法理基礎(chǔ)[J];法學(xué)雜志;2012年06期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 姜福曉;數(shù)字網(wǎng)絡(luò)技術(shù)背景下著作權(quán)法的困境與出路[D];對外經(jīng)濟貿(mào)易大學(xué);2014年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 唐然;微信公眾平臺著作權(quán)侵權(quán)行為及責任認定[D];北京外國語大學(xué);2014年

2 李爽;論作品及其與獨創(chuàng)性的關(guān)系[D];華東政法大學(xué);2014年

3 吳水蘭;作品著作權(quán)人的認定[D];中國政法大學(xué);2014年

4 鄒得萍;論孤兒作品集中許可制度[D];西南財經(jīng)大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號：1575812