本文選題：成年監(jiān)護　切入點：意思自治　出處：《政法論叢》2017年02期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：近年來,關于成年監(jiān)護制度研究,主要表現(xiàn)在兩個方面:一個是"尊重"成年的被監(jiān)護人的意思,建議實行任意或者意定監(jiān)護制度;二是擴大被監(jiān)護人的適用范圍,幾乎達到了所有的成年人,包括了對生活不便、生活困難人的扶助、照料等贍養(yǎng)問題。所以成年監(jiān)護可以解決老年人養(yǎng)老問題,同時提出建議應當修改監(jiān)護制度,使成年監(jiān)護制度能夠容納養(yǎng)老問題。而成年監(jiān)護制度與贍養(yǎng)等養(yǎng)老制度有本質(zhì)區(qū)別,監(jiān)護制度解決的是行為能力不足需要"補"足的問題,制度設計的目的不包括贍養(yǎng)、扶助等養(yǎng)老問題。另外,過度擴大成年人有行為能力時的遺托或者稱為意定監(jiān)護是被監(jiān)護人意思的表現(xiàn),這種判斷是否存在疏漏、或者是否符合被監(jiān)護人利益的意思恐怕也是存在異議的。過分夸大成年監(jiān)護的功能對于應對養(yǎng)老問題并無裨益,試圖將成年監(jiān)護制度打造成解決老年人的"養(yǎng)"老問題的良藥,不是理性的選擇。各個法律制度的設定有其自身的功能,相互之間應當具有清晰的邊界,而絕對不是設法模糊其邊界。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the research on adult guardianship system is mainly manifested in two aspects: one is to "respect" the meaning of adult guardianship, and the other is to expand the scope of application of guardianship. Almost all adults, including support for the inconveniences of life, assistance to people in need of life, care, etc. Therefore, adult guardianship can solve the problem of the aged, and put forward some suggestions that the guardianship system should be revised. The adult guardianship system can accommodate the pension problem. However, the adult guardianship system is essentially different from the old-age care system such as maintenance. The guardianship system solves the problem that the insufficient capacity of behavior needs to be "compensated", and the purpose of the system design does not include maintenance. In addition, when adults have the capacity to act, excessive expansion of the residual care, or the intention of the guardian, is the expression of the intention of the guardian, and whether there are any omissions in this judgment, Or whether it is in the interest of the ward is also disputed. Exaggerating the function of adult guardianship is not helpful in dealing with the problem of the aged, and trying to make the adult guardianship system a good remedy for the elderly's "raising" problems. Each legal system has its own function, and there should be clear boundaries between each other, rather than trying to blur their boundaries.
【作者單位】： 吉林大學法學院;
【基金】：2016年教育部人文社會科學研究規(guī)劃基金一般項目“夫妻共同債務制度研究”(16YJA820009)的階段性成果
【分類號】：D923

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 李因來;;世界各國成年人監(jiān)護制度的歷史演變及比較評析[J];湘潭師范學院學報(社會科學版);2007年02期

2 王U喰，

本文編號：1563356