本文選題：工傷保險賠償　切入點：人身損害賠償　出處：《廣西師范大學》2015年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：隨著社會的飛速發(fā)展,工業(yè)化進程加速,工傷案件頻頻發(fā)生,給職工個人、用人單位帶來了不利的影響。為了分散用人單位的風險,也為了讓職工及時的獲得醫(yī)療救濟等,我國建立了社會保險制度。工傷事故同時滿足了工傷保險賠償及人身損害賠償?shù)臉嫵梢?但由于我國法律的不完善,對此兩種請求權的競合應如何處理沒有明確的規(guī)定,各地做法不一,嚴重影響了法律的權威性和嚴肅性,同時司法實踐的不一致,也導致了司法的不公。本文將圍繞工傷保險賠償請求權與人身損害賠償請求權競合,從以下五個方面來研究：第一部分是關于工傷保險賠償請求權與人身損害賠償請求權競合概述。論述了工傷保險賠償請求權與人身損害賠償?shù)幕纠碚?工傷保險賠償請求權與人身損害賠償請求權區(qū)分,及兩者競合的表現(xiàn)和特征,通過比較這兩種請求權,區(qū)別兩者的異同,充分了解這兩種請求權；第二部分是關于我國工傷保險賠償請求權與人身損害賠償請求權競合的法律法規(guī)規(guī)定。通過介紹我國對工傷保險賠償請求權與人身損害賠償請求權競合的法律、行政法規(guī)及司法解釋的相關規(guī)定,并總結了我國法律法規(guī)對兩者競合問題的規(guī)定存在的問題。通過法律、行政法規(guī)規(guī)章及司法解釋對兩者競合的一些模糊的規(guī)定,分析了我國現(xiàn)存問題的立法弊端和司法弊端,進一步闡明亟待解決兩者競合問題的重要性及實際意義；第三部分是關于處理工傷保險賠償請求權與人身侵權損害賠償請求權競合的司法實踐。論述了在司法實踐當中,當兩種請求權發(fā)生競合的時候,我國存在哪些不同的處理方式,以及在這些處理方式中所存在的問題；第四部分是關于國外有關工傷保險賠償請求權與人身損害賠償請求權競合的處理模式與啟示。論述了國外四種模式處理工傷保險賠償請求權與侵權損害賠償請求權競合,即選擇模式、替代模式、兼得模式、補充模式,分別介紹了這四種主流模式的優(yōu)點和缺陷,并論述從國外的四種處理模式中獲得的處理兩種請求權競合的啟示；第五部分是關于處理工傷保險賠償請求權與人身損害賠償請求權競合的完善建議。從制度、原則、立法等方面對我國處理兩者競合提出建議,認為不能用統(tǒng)一的方式方法處理兩者競合的問題,應該根據(jù)不同的情形適用不同的規(guī)定,從而既保護用人單位的合法權益,亦能保障勞動者的合法權益。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of society and the acceleration of industrialization, the frequent occurrence of industrial injury cases has brought adverse effects to the employees and the employing units. In order to spread the risks of the employers and to enable the workers to obtain medical relief in a timely manner, Our country has established the social insurance system. The industrial injury accident has satisfied the constituent elements of the injury insurance compensation and the personal injury compensation at the same time. However, due to the imperfection of the law of our country, there is no clear stipulation on how to deal with the two kinds of claims. Different practices have seriously affected the authority and seriousness of the law, and at the same time, the inconsistency of judicial practice has also led to judicial injustice. This article will focus on the competition between the right to claim compensation for injury insurance and the right to claim compensation for personal injury. The first part is an overview of the competing rights of claim for compensation for industrial injury insurance and compensation for personal injury, and discusses the basic theory of the right of claim for compensation for compensation of industrial injury insurance and compensation for personal injury. The distinction between the claim right of industrial injury insurance compensation and the claim right of personal injury compensation, and the manifestation and characteristics of their concurrence, through comparing these two kinds of claim rights, distinguishing the similarities and differences between them, fully understand the two kinds of claim rights; The second part is about the laws and regulations about the concurrence of the right to claim for compensation for industrial injury insurance and the right to claim for personal injury in our country. By introducing the law of the concurrence between the right of claim for compensation for compensation for industrial injury insurance and the right to claim compensation for personal injury in our country, The related provisions of administrative regulations and judicial interpretation, and summarizes the problems existing in the provisions of the laws and regulations of our country on the issue of the concurrence of the two. Through the laws, administrative regulations and rules and regulations and judicial interpretation of the competing of the two of the fuzzy provisions, This paper analyzes the legislative malpractice and judicial malpractice of the existing problems in our country, and further clarifies the importance and practical significance of the two problems urgently needed to be solved. The third part is about the judicial practice of dealing with the concurrence of the claim for compensation for compensation for industrial injury insurance and the claim for compensation for personal tort. And the problems existing in these methods; The 4th part is about the handling mode and inspiration of foreign countries about the concurrence of the claim right of industrial injury insurance compensation and the claim right of personal injury compensation, and discusses the concurrence of four kinds of foreign modes dealing with the claim right of industrial injury insurance compensation and the claim right of tort damage compensation. This paper introduces the advantages and disadvantages of the four main modes, and discusses the enlightenment of the two competing claims from the four processing modes abroad. The 5th part is about the perfect suggestion to deal with the concurrence of the claim right of compensation for industrial injury insurance and the right to claim for personal injury. The author puts forward some suggestions on how to deal with the competing of the two in our country from the aspects of system, principle, legislation and so on. It is considered that the problem of competing between the two should not be dealt with in a unified way, and different regulations should be applied according to different circumstances, so as to protect the legitimate rights and interests of the employing unit and the legitimate rights and interests of the laborer.
【學位授予單位】：廣西師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D923

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 胡宜奎;;公司對敗訴股東的損害賠償請求權[J];南京財經(jīng)大學學報;2012年01期

2 劉傳山;論胎兒的損害賠償請求權[J];甘肅政法成人教育學院學報;2002年02期

3 楊海涌;論損害賠償請求權——由黑龍江王君索賠一案引發(fā)的思考[J];株洲工學院學報;2002年S1期

4 楊海涌;關于損害賠償請求權的法律思考[J];邵陽學院學報;2004年02期

5 曾青;胎兒損害賠償請求權相關法律問題探討[J];西南民族大學學報(人文社科版);2005年04期

6 左平良,鄭石榮;論胎兒的損害賠償請求權[J];南華大學學報(社會科學版);2005年03期

7 戎魏魏;;論從屬公司的損害賠償請求權[J];重慶工商大學學報(社會科學版);2006年04期

8 陳向軍;鄔文俊;;論因侵害生命權而產(chǎn)生的損害賠償請求權之理論基礎[J];湖北師范學院學報(哲學社會科學版);2007年01期

9 陳煜;;生命損害賠償請求權基礎的再探究[J];安徽大學法律評論;2007年01期

10 張文勝;;胎兒損害賠償請求權基礎之考察[J];滁州學院學報;2008年06期

相關會議論文 前1條

1 徐麗芳;;論法人的精神損害賠償請求權[A];當代法學論壇（2008年第4輯）[C];2008年

相關重要報紙文章 前10條

1 馮玉璋;人身損害賠償請求權不得轉(zhuǎn)讓[N];江蘇經(jīng)濟報;2009年

2 栗嘉寶;關于胎兒損害賠償請求權的探討[N];法制日報;2013年

3 陽賢文;損害賠償請求權的法理依據(jù)[N];人民法院報;2005年

4 秦曉東;精神損害賠償請求權能繼承嗎[N];人民法院報;2004年

5 胡坤;刑事被害人精神損害賠償請求權探析[N];江蘇經(jīng)濟報;2012年

6 韋標昌;離婚損害賠償請求權中的主體與時效[N];廣西政法報;2002年

7 潘昌奎 吳育瑞;錦屏檢方督促起訴挽回國家損失11萬[N];法制生活報;2010年

8 劉俊海 中國人民大學商法研究所所長 中國消費者協(xié)會副會長;夯實保護消費者法律基石[N];經(jīng)濟日報;2014年

9 高嶺;違約責任還是侵權責任[N];證券時報;2003年

10 記者 陳郁;讓消費維權底氣更足[N];經(jīng)濟日報;2014年

相關碩士學位論文 前10條

1 禚洪娟;論旅游者的時間浪費損害賠償請求權[D];揚州大學;2015年

2 呂倩西;胎兒權益損害賠償法律問題研究[D];西南大學;2016年

3 李穎;論工傷保險賠償請求權與人身損害賠償請求權競合及其法律適用[D];廣西師范大學;2015年

4 張萬明;論胎兒損害賠償請求權的法律保護[D];蘭州大學;2009年

5 許卓訓;海上運輸貨物損害賠償請求權研究[D];上海海事大學;2006年

6 劉峭;錯誤出生損害賠償請求權研究[D];遼寧大學;2013年

7 趙中華;交通事故損害賠償請求權競合研究[D];中南大學;2012年

8 盧慧玲;胎兒損害賠償請求權的司法實務研究[D];河北大學;2011年

9 梁遠航;證券投資者損害賠償請求權研究[D];西南財經(jīng)大學;2003年

10 曹杰;第三人損害賠償請求權范圍探析[D];蘇州大學;2008年

，

本文編號：1558371