本文關(guān)鍵詞： 預(yù)約 要件 效力 違約責(zé)任　出處：《中國政法大學(xué)》2006年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：預(yù)約是契約,是約定將來訂立一定契約之契約。預(yù)約處在訂立本約的談判過程中,談判過程的準備性和不確定性,導(dǎo)致了預(yù)約的不確定性。本文從預(yù)約的這一特質(zhì)入手,分析了預(yù)約的概念、法律性質(zhì)、分類以及構(gòu)成要件,在此基礎(chǔ)上對預(yù)約的法律效力和法律責(zé)任了全面的研究。 本文主要包括五部分: 引言部分簡單介紹了預(yù)約的現(xiàn)實意義,即作為契約法對社會交易現(xiàn)實的回應(yīng),預(yù)約是人們用契約方式調(diào)整復(fù)雜談判過程中信賴關(guān)系的重要手段 第一部分主要分析了預(yù)約的概念、法律性質(zhì)及類型,將預(yù)約明確定位為債權(quán)契約。其中還包括預(yù)約的歷史考察及預(yù)約與本約的關(guān)系。 第二部分研究了預(yù)約的構(gòu)成要件,討論了預(yù)約在滿足一般契約成立要件后的特殊要求。因預(yù)約的不確定性,預(yù)約在當事人、契約形式、內(nèi)容方面有不同的考慮。這些特殊的形式和實質(zhì)要件為預(yù)約的成立提供了標準。 第三部分介紹了預(yù)約的效力。預(yù)約當事人依自由意思對談判義務(wù)的約定是預(yù)約效力的根源。為了維護依預(yù)約建立的信賴關(guān)系,當事人履行約定談判行為應(yīng)符合誠實信用原則的要求。在英美法中,允諾禁反言原則使預(yù)約成為有拘束力契約。在此基礎(chǔ)上,分類說明了預(yù)約當事人應(yīng)當誠信地履行約定的談判義務(wù)。 第四部分討論了違反預(yù)約應(yīng)當承擔的違約責(zé)任進行。內(nèi)容涉及預(yù)約與締約過失的關(guān)系;預(yù)約采用過錯責(zé)任原則的理由;依據(jù)預(yù)約不同的確定程度,各種違約賠償方式的在預(yù)約中的具體適用。 第五部分為文章的結(jié)論,概括闡明了文章的觀點。
[Abstract]:Precontract is a contract, contract is agreed to reach in the future. At the conclusion of the contract of appointment about the negotiation process, the readiness of the negotiation process and uncertainty leads to the uncertainty from the appointment. This special appointment with the appointment of the concept, legal nature, classification and elements, this on the basis of the legal effect of reservations and the legal responsibility of the comprehensive study.
This article mainly includes five parts:
The introduction briefly introduces the practical significance of appointment, that is, as a response to the reality of social transactions as a contract law, appointment is an important way to adjust the trust relationship in complex negotiation process with contract.
The first part mainly analyzes the concept, legal nature and types of appointment, making the appointment clearly defined as the creditor's right contract. It also includes the historical investigation of appointment and the relationship between appointment and the covenant.
The second part of the book elements discussed in general to meet the special requirements of the appointment contract was established after the elements. Because of the uncertainty of the appointment, an appointment at the party, the form of the contract, there are different considerations. These special forms and essential elements to provide a standard for the establishment of an appointment.
The third part introduces the legal efficacy. The meaning of freedom of the party with the appointment agreement negotiation obligation is the root of reservation effect. In order to maintain the reservation according to established trust relationship, the parties agreed to fulfil the negotiation behavior should conform to the principle of honesty and credit requirements. In the common law, the doctrine of promissory estoppel to make an appointment to become a binding contract. On this basis, the classification that appointment parties shall faithfully perform contract negotiations obligations.
The fourth part discusses the liability for breach of contract which should be undertaken in violation of an appointment. The content involves the relationship between appointment and contracting negligence, the reason why the appointment adopts the principle of fault liability, and the specific application of various forms of compensation for breach of contract in the appointment according to the different degree of appointment.
The fifth part is the conclusion of the article, which generalizes the views of the article.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2006
【分類號】：D913

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 錢玉林;預(yù)約合同初論[J];甘肅政法學(xué)院學(xué)報;2003年04期

，

本文編號：1552949