本文關(guān)鍵詞： 專利侵權(quán) 法定賠償 產(chǎn)業(yè)區(qū)分 訴前調(diào)解 差額利潤法　出處：《現(xiàn)代法學(xué)》2015年04期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：我國專利侵權(quán)法定賠償存在明顯的產(chǎn)業(yè)區(qū)分特征和多種賠償計(jì)算方法并用傾向。從參考因素看,除權(quán)利類型和專利許可費(fèi)用外,對于快速消費(fèi)品案件,法院側(cè)重于侵權(quán)人生產(chǎn)規(guī)模和侵權(quán)產(chǎn)品價(jià)格;對于耐用消費(fèi)品案件,法院還會(huì)額外關(guān)注侵權(quán)人的銷售范圍和侵權(quán)行為;對于高新技術(shù)產(chǎn)品案件,法院則會(huì)參考原告的賠償請求,并重點(diǎn)關(guān)注侵權(quán)人有無惡意行為或侵犯國外專利權(quán)人的情形。新《專利法》實(shí)施后,高新技術(shù)產(chǎn)品法定賠償額有顯著提升。在原告損失或侵權(quán)獲利部分確定之前提下,法院應(yīng)結(jié)合產(chǎn)品的行業(yè)特點(diǎn)對不確定因素進(jìn)行法定賠償,賠償總額允許超過100萬元限額,對于專利經(jīng)濟(jì)貢獻(xiàn)難以量化的高新技術(shù)產(chǎn)品專利糾紛,應(yīng)考慮引入技術(shù)分?jǐn)傇瓌t和差額利潤法,減少法定賠償原則的適用。
[Abstract]:Legal compensation for patent infringement in China has obvious characteristics of industrial differentiation and the tendency to use a variety of compensation calculation methods. From the point of view of reference factors, in addition to the types of rights and the cost of patent licensing, for cases of fast moving consumer goods, The court focuses on the scale of the infringer's production and the price of the infringing product; in the case of consumer durable goods, the court will also pay additional attention to the scope of sale and infringement of the infringer; and in the case of high-tech products, the court will refer to the plaintiff's claim for compensation. After the implementation of the new Patent Law, the legal compensation for high-tech products has been significantly increased. Under the premise of partial determination of the plaintiff's loss or profit from infringement, it is also important to focus on whether the infringer has committed malicious acts or infringements on foreign patentees. The court should make legal compensation for the uncertain factors according to the characteristics of the industry of the products. The total amount of compensation is allowed to exceed the limit of 1 million yuan, and it is difficult to quantify the contribution of the patent economy to the patent disputes of high and new technology products. Consideration should be given to introducing the principle of technology sharing and the law of differential profit to reduce the application of the principle of statutory compensation.
【作者單位】： 南京理工大學(xué)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)學(xué)院;
【基金】：2015年國家知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)局專利事業(yè)戰(zhàn)略推進(jìn)計(jì)劃項(xiàng)目“新常態(tài)下江蘇特色專利政策法規(guī)創(chuàng)新研究”(zlzlxm-A-02) 知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)“十三五”規(guī)劃研究項(xiàng)目“國家整體利益最大化原則下知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)強(qiáng)國建設(shè)的路徑研究”(15428280)
【分類號(hào)】：D923.42

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 錢玉文;;論我國知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法定賠償制度的司法適用[J];社會(huì)科學(xué)家;2008年02期

2 陳健;;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法定賠償面臨的問題及對策[J];鹽城師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年01期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 朱啟莉;我國知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法定賠償制度研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2010年

2 賀寧馨;我國專利侵權(quán)訴訟有效性的實(shí)證研究[D];華中科技大學(xué);2012年

【共引文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 錢玉文;駱福林;;論我國知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法中的懲罰性賠償[J];法學(xué)雜志;2009年04期

2 張春艷;;我國知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法定賠償制度之反思與完善[J];法學(xué)雜志;2011年05期

3 莫e，

本文編號(hào)：1540483