本文關(guān)鍵詞： 深度鏈接 服務(wù)器標(biāo)準(zhǔn) 實(shí)質(zhì)呈現(xiàn) 加框鏈接　出處：《華南理工大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：網(wǎng)絡(luò)鏈接在互聯(lián)網(wǎng)信息服務(wù)發(fā)展的過(guò)程中發(fā)揮了重要的作用,幫助用戶(hù)在浩瀚如煙的互聯(lián)網(wǎng)信息中迅速定位到有用信息,大大提高了信息傳播的效率。在網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)保護(hù)的初期,提供搜索、鏈接的網(wǎng)站、平臺(tái)基于“技術(shù)中立”的“實(shí)質(zhì)非侵權(quán)用途”、“服務(wù)器標(biāo)準(zhǔn)”等原則被貼上“網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供商”“避風(fēng)港”的標(biāo)簽,認(rèn)為其因不直接提供作品內(nèi)容,而不屬于信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播行為。基于專(zhuān)有權(quán)利應(yīng)當(dāng)控制一定的行為,因而搜索、鏈接服務(wù)商無(wú)法構(gòu)成對(duì)權(quán)利人信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)的直接侵犯。在理論上,構(gòu)成間接侵權(quán)的前提是直接侵權(quán)的存在,間接侵權(quán)行為主觀上存在故意、客觀上對(duì)侵權(quán)行為的危害結(jié)果起到了擴(kuò)大和延伸。隨著互聯(lián)網(wǎng)技術(shù)的發(fā)展,網(wǎng)絡(luò)鏈接的形式越來(lái)越多,從普通鏈接到深度鏈接,從網(wǎng)頁(yè)端走向移動(dòng)客戶(hù)端,打著深度鏈接旗號(hào)的內(nèi)容聚合服務(wù)平臺(tái)越來(lái)越多,除了眾所周知的埋置鏈接、下載鏈接、縱深鏈接,還出現(xiàn)了以云視頻技術(shù)、加框鏈接、轉(zhuǎn)碼技術(shù)、WAP搜索為代表的“鏈接”服務(wù)。諸如百度音樂(lè)盒深度鏈接提供下載、網(wǎng)易視頻加框鏈接嵌套播放第三方網(wǎng)站視頻、“今日頭條”鏈接傳統(tǒng)媒體文字作品轉(zhuǎn)碼優(yōu)化遭遇投訴、快播模式等聚合類(lèi)平臺(tái)的定向搜索等,傳統(tǒng)互聯(lián)網(wǎng)和移動(dòng)互聯(lián)網(wǎng)中基于深度鏈接服務(wù)的侵權(quán)糾紛頻頻上演。我國(guó)信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)保護(hù)的相關(guān)規(guī)定與學(xué)術(shù)觀點(diǎn)多借鑒國(guó)外,學(xué)術(shù)界、司法界在深度鏈接行為的侵權(quán)判定中對(duì)于“服務(wù)器標(biāo)準(zhǔn)”和“用戶(hù)感知標(biāo)準(zhǔn)”的認(rèn)識(shí)不一,對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)商的區(qū)分有爭(zhēng)議,對(duì)構(gòu)成直接侵權(quán)還是間接侵權(quán)有較大爭(zhēng)議,對(duì)信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播行為的定義不準(zhǔn)確司法實(shí)踐中對(duì)相關(guān)案件的判罰標(biāo)準(zhǔn)較為混亂。新技術(shù)支撐的云計(jì)算時(shí)代,是否控制服務(wù)器或?qū)⒆髌穬?chǔ)存于服務(wù)器中已經(jīng)失去了判定網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)商侵權(quán)的實(shí)際意義;對(duì)于用戶(hù)而言,設(shè)置深度鏈接的網(wǎng)站比直接擁有內(nèi)容的網(wǎng)站向外提供和傳播了更多的作品,因此吸引了更多的用戶(hù)和流量,在其中獲得了實(shí)質(zhì)性的商業(yè)利益。同時(shí)不能一刀切得認(rèn)為自稱(chēng)提供搜索、鏈接的網(wǎng)站、平臺(tái)、客戶(hù)端必然提供的是最高法司法解釋中信息定位、鏈接、搜索的網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù),而應(yīng)深刻解讀網(wǎng)絡(luò)信息傳播行為的界定,“提供”行為標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的界定;實(shí)質(zhì)呈現(xiàn)作品內(nèi)容的深度鏈接行為應(yīng)該認(rèn)定為直接侵犯著作權(quán)的行為。
[Abstract]:Network links play an important role in the development of Internet information services, helping users to quickly locate useful information in the vast amount of Internet information. Greatly improve the efficiency of information dissemination. In the early days of network copyright protection, provide search, link website, platform based on "technology neutrality" "substantive non-tort use". Principles such as "server standards" have been labeled as "web service providers" and "havens" because they do not directly provide the content of the work. Based on the exclusive right should control a certain behavior, therefore, the search, link service provider can not constitute a direct violation of the right to information network transmission rights. In theory. The premise of the indirect infringement is the existence of direct infringement, the subjective intention of indirect tort, and the expansion and extension of the harmful result of the infringement objectively. With the development of Internet technology. The form of network link is more and more, from common link to deep link, from web end to mobile client, content aggregation service platform under the banner of deep link is more and more, except for the well-known buried link. Download links, deep links, and "link" services represented by cloud video technology, framed links, transcoding technologies, and WAP search. Such as Baidu music box depth link provides download. NetEase video box links nested play third-party website video, "Today headline" links to traditional media text works transcoding optimization encounter complaints, rapid-broadcast mode and other aggregation platform of targeted search and so on. Traditional Internet and mobile Internet based on deep link service infringement disputes frequently staged. Our country information network transmission right protection related regulations and academic views more reference to foreign academic circles. In the judgment of infringement of deep link behavior, the judicial circles have different understanding of "server standard" and "user perception standard", and the distinction of network service provider is controversial. To constitute direct or indirect infringement there is a greater controversy, the definition of information network communication behavior inaccurate judicial practice in the relevant cases of sentencing standards are more confused. New technology to support the cloud computing era. Whether to control the server or store the work in the server has lost the practical significance of judging the infringement of network service provider; For users, websites with deep links provide and disseminate more work than websites that directly own content, thus attracting more users and traffic. At the same time, we can not think that they provide search, link website, platform, client must provide information positioning and link in the judicial interpretation of Supreme Law. Search network service, but should deeply interpret the definition of network information dissemination behavior, "provide" the definition of behavior standards; The deep link behavior of the content of the presentation works should be regarded as the act of direct infringement of copyright.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華南理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D923.41

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉勇;鏈接中侵權(quán)行為的界定及法律適用[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2005年02期

2 毛之敏;;設(shè)鏈行為之間接侵權(quán)的認(rèn)定——兼評(píng)優(yōu)度訴迅雷案一審判決[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2008年07期

3 芮松艷;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)案件綜述[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2010年01期

4 陳加勝;;信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)與鏈接的關(guān)系[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2010年02期

5 陸幸福;;論搜索引擎服務(wù)商在提供鏈接過(guò)程中的權(quán)利與義務(wù)——基于霍菲爾德權(quán)利理論的一種分析[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2013年04期

6 崔國(guó)斌;;著作權(quán)法下移動(dòng)網(wǎng)絡(luò)內(nèi)容聚合服務(wù)的重新定性[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2014年08期

7 馬驍;網(wǎng)絡(luò)鏈接中的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)問(wèn)題研究[J];河北法學(xué);2001年01期

8 石必勝;;論鏈接不替代原則——以下載鏈接的經(jīng)濟(jì)分析為進(jìn)路[J];科技與法律;2008年05期

9 石靜;劉欣亮;;使用Iframe實(shí)現(xiàn)網(wǎng)頁(yè)之間數(shù)據(jù)的“隱形”傳送[J];軟件導(dǎo)刊;2011年11期

10 孔祥俊;;論信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播行為[J];人民司法;2012年07期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 錢(qián)識(shí)琛;深度鏈接引發(fā)的著作權(quán)侵權(quán)行為研究[D];華中科技大學(xué);2010年

2 趙彥杰;網(wǎng)絡(luò)鏈接中的侵犯版權(quán)問(wèn)題研究[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2010年

3 衛(wèi)蕾;網(wǎng)絡(luò)鏈接法律問(wèn)題研究[D];山東大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：1479307