發(fā)布時間：2018-01-24 03:27

  本文關(guān)鍵詞： 人工智能創(chuàng)造物 人類受眾 作者 知識產(chǎn)權(quán) 權(quán)利歸屬　出處：《法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報)》2017年05期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：人工智能從輔助人類創(chuàng)造的工具逐漸發(fā)展到具有自主創(chuàng)造的能力。計算機(jī)輔助完成的創(chuàng)新成果體現(xiàn)了人類的創(chuàng)造性,符合專利或版權(quán)保護(hù)的條件;但人工智能創(chuàng)造物卻遭遇了知識產(chǎn)權(quán)法只保護(hù)人類創(chuàng)造的理念和制度障礙。然而,它并非是不可跨越的制度鴻溝。三十余年前,英國立法保護(hù)"計算機(jī)生成的作品",這表明知識產(chǎn)權(quán)法可以兼容人工智能創(chuàng)造物的保護(hù)。在理論上,構(gòu)建以人類讀者(受眾)為基礎(chǔ),而不是以人類作者、發(fā)明人為中心的版權(quán)法和專利法理論,即可解決人工智能創(chuàng)造物的法律地位問題,其權(quán)利歸屬問題也同樣可以在不與傳統(tǒng)規(guī)則相沖突的方式下得到解決。
[Abstract]:Artificial intelligence has gradually developed from the aid of human creation tools to the ability of independent creation. The computer aided innovation reflects the creativity of human beings and conforms to the conditions of patent or copyright protection. But the artificial intelligence creation has encountered the intellectual property law only protects the human creation idea and the system barrier. However, it is not the system gap which cannot not be crossed. More than 30 years ago. British legislation protects "computer-generated works", which suggests that intellectual property law is compatible with the protection of artificial intelligence creations. In theory, construction is based on human readers (audiences) rather than human authors. Inventor-centered copyright law and patent law theory can solve the problem of legal status of artificial intelligence creation, and the problem of ownership of rights can also be solved in a way that does not conflict with traditional rules.
【作者單位】： 南京師范大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【基金】：國家社科基金后期資助項目(2016FFX023)“變革中的版權(quán)制度研究”
【分類號】：D913
【正文快照】： 一、問題的提出 自約翰·麥卡錫在1956年使用“人工智能”這個詞語以來,[1]盡管離科幻電影所描述的場景尚有相當(dāng)距離,但毫無疑問,人工智能已屬于人類取得的最重要的技術(shù)進(jìn)步。無論擔(dān)心它是對惡魔的召喚(1),還是欣喜人類成為“造物主”,[2]292它已逐漸滲入我們的日常生活:自動，

本文編號：1459046