本文關(guān)鍵詞：向公眾傳播權(quán)的立法構(gòu)想　出處：《時代法學(xué)》2016年01期 　論文類型：期刊論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 向公眾傳播權(quán) 廣播權(quán) 信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán) 傳播 公眾

【摘要】：我國《著作權(quán)法》第三次修法過程中對廣播權(quán)和信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)的修改幾易其稿,而司法實踐中這兩項權(quán)利也引發(fā)了很大的爭議。無論是廣播權(quán)還是信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán),實際上都屬于法理上的向公眾傳播權(quán)。雖然我國并沒有規(guī)定一項總的向公眾傳播權(quán),但該項權(quán)利在《伯爾尼公約》和WCT等國際公約中已經(jīng)得以確立。參考各國的相關(guān)立法模式,美國用發(fā)行權(quán)和公開表演權(quán)來規(guī)制向公眾傳播行為的立法模式太過繁雜,歐盟等國家和地區(qū)采用的相關(guān)立法模式最具可行性,根據(jù)后者的立法和司法實踐,界定"向公眾傳播權(quán)"的范圍需要考慮兩個要件,即"傳播"和"公眾"。應(yīng)當嘗試在我國《著作權(quán)法》中設(shè)立總括性的"向公眾傳播權(quán)",同時可以在該項權(quán)利之下將一些較為成熟且類型化的子權(quán)利進行列舉。
[Abstract]:In the course of the third revision of the copyright Law in our country, the right to broadcast and the right to spread information on the Internet are amended in several ways. In judicial practice, these two rights have also aroused great controversy, whether broadcast rights or the right to spread information on the Internet. In fact, all belong to the right of communication to the public in legal theory, although our country has not stipulated a general right of communication to the public. However, this right has been established in the Bern Convention and WCT and other international conventions. The United States uses the right of circulation and public performance to regulate the behavior of communication to the public, the legislative model is too complicated, the European Union and other countries and regions to adopt the most feasible legislative model, according to the latter legislation and judicial practice. To define the scope of "the right to communicate to the public" needs to consider two elements, that is, "communication" and "public". We should try to establish the omnibus "right of communication to the public" in the copyright Law of our country. At the same time, some mature and typed sub-rights can be listed under this right.
【作者單位】： 中國人民大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【分類號】：D923.41
【正文快照】： 2014年《著作權(quán)法》修改草案送審稿正式向外界發(fā)布。本次著作權(quán)法修法對著作權(quán)中的財產(chǎn)權(quán)利 作出了較大的變動,尤為引人注目的是其對廣播權(quán)和信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)的修改,這兩項權(quán)利的修改歷程可謂曲折。立法和司法上對“廣播權(quán)”和“信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)”的界定存在著較大的爭議,也引

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 安德魯·克雷斯帝;伊洛易絲·戴愛斯;李靜;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)時代澳大利亞版權(quán)法中的新型傳播權(quán)[J];暨南學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2008年05期

2 宋哲;;對“彩鈴”法律性質(zhì)的分析[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2011年Z1期

3 彭春萍;網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間作者權(quán)與傳輸者的抑與揚[J];科技與法律;2000年04期

4 ;新技術(shù)帶來侵權(quán)新難題──網(wǎng)絡(luò)世界怎樣實施“保護”[J];w攣胖蕓，

本文編號：1396335