本文關(guān)鍵詞：論我國(guó)復(fù)制權(quán)的保護(hù)范圍的擴(kuò)大　出處：《吉林大學(xué)》2016年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 復(fù)制權(quán) 臨時(shí)復(fù)制 異體復(fù)制 著作權(quán)

【摘要】：復(fù)制權(quán)作為著作權(quán)的核心權(quán)利,在科技不斷進(jìn)步的今天有著十分重要的地位。保護(hù)好和調(diào)整好這項(xiàng)權(quán)利,涉及到經(jīng)濟(jì)利益和社會(huì)利益等諸多方面。從現(xiàn)有的著作權(quán)法來(lái)看,復(fù)制權(quán)的保護(hù)存在著一定的滯后性和保守性。復(fù)制權(quán)保護(hù)范圍過(guò)窄會(huì)挫傷創(chuàng)作者的積極性,不利于文化創(chuàng)新;但如果復(fù)制權(quán)保護(hù)范圍過(guò)寬,則不利于作品的傳播和利用,損害社會(huì)公眾利益。新技術(shù)條件下,某種復(fù)制行為能否納入復(fù)制權(quán)的保護(hù)范圍,需要在結(jié)合復(fù)制權(quán)的本質(zhì)特征的基礎(chǔ)上做出價(jià)值判斷,本文著重從臨時(shí)復(fù)制和異體復(fù)制兩個(gè)方面討論復(fù)制權(quán)的保護(hù)范圍在《著作權(quán)法》修訂過(guò)程中應(yīng)如何規(guī)制。本文采用比較研究法、案例分析法等方法,對(duì)我國(guó)復(fù)制權(quán)保護(hù)范圍進(jìn)行分析,本文分為引言、正文以及結(jié)論三大部分,其中正文又由三部分組成,分別介紹了我國(guó)復(fù)制權(quán)保護(hù)范圍應(yīng)予擴(kuò)大的現(xiàn)實(shí)需求、我國(guó)復(fù)制權(quán)保護(hù)范圍擴(kuò)大的表現(xiàn)及原因分析、我國(guó)復(fù)制權(quán)保護(hù)范圍擴(kuò)大的制度跟進(jìn)。本文引言介紹了我國(guó)傳統(tǒng)的復(fù)制權(quán)的保護(hù)范圍及新技術(shù)條件下出現(xiàn)的新的表現(xiàn)形式,結(jié)合《著作權(quán)法》的第三次修改,提出相關(guān)問(wèn)題而引出正文部分。第一部分為復(fù)制權(quán)保護(hù)范圍應(yīng)予擴(kuò)大的現(xiàn)實(shí)需求。介紹了復(fù)制權(quán)的概念、發(fā)展歷程及核心特征,分析了現(xiàn)行《著作權(quán)法》中復(fù)制權(quán)規(guī)定的滯后性。并著重闡述了復(fù)制權(quán)保護(hù)范圍應(yīng)予擴(kuò)大的必要性,從《著作權(quán)法》的立法宗旨、法的規(guī)范作用、對(duì)外貿(mào)易發(fā)展等角度進(jìn)行了論述,并簡(jiǎn)單介紹了我國(guó)已經(jīng)加入的與版權(quán)相關(guān)的國(guó)際條約,闡明了相關(guān)責(zé)任和義務(wù);本文的第二部分是全文的核心內(nèi)容,重點(diǎn)就復(fù)制權(quán)保護(hù)范圍擴(kuò)大的表現(xiàn)及原因進(jìn)行了分析。通過(guò)介紹騰訊公司訴王友金、淘寶公司著作權(quán)糾紛案,騰訊公司訴光陽(yáng)電器公司、濟(jì)南銀座集團(tuán)著作權(quán)糾紛案及相關(guān)法律評(píng)析,分析臨時(shí)復(fù)制和異體復(fù)制的本質(zhì)內(nèi)容及在案例中的具體表現(xiàn)。并從多個(gè)角度闡述臨時(shí)復(fù)制和異體復(fù)制納入復(fù)制權(quán)保護(hù)范圍的必要性,包括其本質(zhì)特征、國(guó)際立法趨勢(shì)及可操作性和執(zhí)行性等,進(jìn)而得出復(fù)制權(quán)的保護(hù)范圍應(yīng)予擴(kuò)大的結(jié)論。這既順應(yīng)國(guó)際法律發(fā)展趨勢(shì),又能有效保護(hù)創(chuàng)作者的積極性,促進(jìn)文化領(lǐng)域的創(chuàng)新;第三部分為我國(guó)復(fù)制權(quán)保護(hù)范圍擴(kuò)大的制度跟進(jìn),介紹了《著作權(quán)法》第三次修改過(guò)程中復(fù)制權(quán)概念的擴(kuò)大并提出修改建議。同時(shí)闡明任何權(quán)利都不是絕對(duì)的,在擴(kuò)大復(fù)制權(quán)保護(hù)范圍的同時(shí)應(yīng)完善復(fù)制權(quán)的限制制度,如合理使用、法定許可等。并簡(jiǎn)單介紹了合理使用和法定許可制度的基本內(nèi)容及其在各國(guó)家的法律規(guī)定。同時(shí)闡述了我國(guó)現(xiàn)行《著作權(quán)法》中合理使用和法定許可的相關(guān)規(guī)定,分析其不足之處,以拋磚引玉,不斷完善我國(guó)復(fù)制權(quán)的權(quán)利限制體系。
[Abstract]:As the core right of copyright, the right of reproduction has a very important position in the continuous progress of science and technology today. From the point of view of the existing copyright law, there is a lag and conservatism in the protection of the right of reproduction. The narrow scope of the protection of the right of reproduction will dampen the enthusiasm of the creators. Not conducive to cultural innovation; However, if the scope of protection of reproduction right is too wide, it is not conducive to the dissemination and use of works, harm the public interests. Under the new technology conditions, a certain reproduction behavior can be included in the scope of protection of reproduction rights. It is necessary to make a value judgment on the basis of combining the essential characteristics of reproduction right. This paper mainly discusses how to regulate the scope of protection of the right of reproduction in the process of revision of copyright Law from two aspects of temporary reproduction and allogenic reproduction. This paper adopts the method of comparative research and case analysis. This article is divided into three parts: introduction, text and conclusion, in which the text is made up of three parts, which respectively introduces the realistic demand that the scope of the protection of reproduction right should be expanded in our country. The performance and cause analysis of the expansion of the scope of the protection of the right of replication in China. This article introduces the scope of protection of the traditional reproduction rights and new forms of expression under the new technological conditions, combined with the third revision of the copyright Law. The first part is the realistic demand that the scope of the protection of the right of reproduction should be expanded. It introduces the concept, development and core characteristics of the right of reproduction. This paper analyzes the lagging nature of the right of reproduction in the present copyright Law, and emphatically expounds the necessity of expanding the scope of the protection of the right of reproduction, from the legislative purpose of the copyright Law and the normative role of the law. This paper discusses the development of foreign trade and briefly introduces the international treaties related to copyright that China has acceded to, and clarifies the relevant responsibilities and obligations. The second part of this paper is the core content of the full text, focusing on the reproduction of the scope of the protection of the performance and reasons for the expansion. Through the introduction of Tencent Inc. v. Wang Youjin, Taobao Company copyright dispute case. Tencent Corporation v. Guangyang Electric Co., Ltd., Jinan Ginza Group copyright dispute case and related legal comments. This paper analyzes the essential content of temporary and allogenic replication and its concrete performance in the case, and expounds the necessity of bringing temporary replication and allogenic replication into the scope of protection of reproduction right from many angles, including its essential characteristics. The trend of international legislation and its maneuverability and implementability, etc., and then draw the conclusion that the scope of protection of the right of reproduction should be expanded, which not only conforms to the trend of international legal development, but also can effectively protect the initiative of creators. Promoting innovation in the field of culture; The third part introduces the extension of the concept of reproduction right in the process of the third revision of copyright Law, and puts forward some suggestions for amendment. At the same time, it clarifies that any rights are not absolute. At the same time, we should perfect the restriction system of reproduction right, such as reasonable use. It also introduces the basic contents of the system of reasonable use and legal permission and its legal provisions in various countries. At the same time, it expounds the relevant provisions of reasonable use and legal permission in the current copyright Law of China. . Analysis of its shortcomings, to continue to improve China's right to copy the right to limit system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號(hào)】：D923.41

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉長(zhǎng)城;;論網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境下的復(fù)制權(quán)問(wèn)題[J];科技信息(科學(xué)教研);2007年25期

2 黃國(guó)彬;;適用于圖書館的復(fù)制權(quán)例外的基本問(wèn)題研究[J];圖書館雜志;2011年01期

3 趙靖;;圖書館業(yè)務(wù)與復(fù)制權(quán)的保護(hù)[J];圖書館雜志;1994年06期

4 季風(fēng);英刊報(bào)道我加強(qiáng)復(fù)制權(quán)保護(hù)[J];出版參考;1995年19期

5 陳建民;閆偉榮;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境下復(fù)制權(quán)的界定[J];科學(xué)新聞;2001年25期

6 郭凱峰 ,龐秀平;網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境下著作復(fù)制權(quán)保護(hù)的困境及對(duì)策[J];社會(huì)科學(xué)論壇;2003年07期

7 丁威;網(wǎng)絡(luò)時(shí)代的復(fù)制權(quán)[J];安徽商貿(mào)職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年02期

8 劉潤(rùn)濤;;數(shù)字與網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境下的復(fù)制權(quán)制度研究[J];網(wǎng)絡(luò)法律評(píng)論;2005年00期

9 姜世華;;國(guó)外復(fù)制權(quán)問(wèn)題研究[J];農(nóng)業(yè)圖書情報(bào)學(xué)刊;2009年06期

10 沈麗紅;;圖書館數(shù)字化建設(shè)與復(fù)制權(quán)[J];安徽警官職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年03期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前2條

1 記者 楊傲多;維護(hù)著作權(quán)人復(fù)制權(quán)音著協(xié)同時(shí)立案三起[N];法制日?qǐng)?bào);2009年

2 李東生;書店無(wú)權(quán)允許讀者“拍攝圖書”[N];中國(guó)新聞出版報(bào);2007年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 趙曼姿;“異體復(fù)制”的法律問(wèn)題研究[D];蘭州大學(xué);2016年

2 史丹;3D打印技術(shù)背景下復(fù)制權(quán)問(wèn)題研究[D];中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)院研究生院;2016年

3 何海鳳;論我國(guó)復(fù)制權(quán)的保護(hù)范圍的擴(kuò)大[D];吉林大學(xué);2016年

4 葉花;網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境下復(fù)制權(quán)法律問(wèn)題研究[D];蘭州大學(xué);2007年

5 李倩;復(fù)制權(quán)與改編權(quán)侵權(quán)判定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的區(qū)分[D];西南政法大學(xué);2015年

6 虞正春;論復(fù)制權(quán)[D];華東政法學(xué)院;2005年

7 王曉;論網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境下的復(fù)制權(quán)[D];中南大學(xué);2010年

8 沈秋源;論云計(jì)算背景下的軟件復(fù)制權(quán)[D];華東政法大學(xué);2013年

9 何迅羽;云計(jì)算環(huán)境下的復(fù)制權(quán)問(wèn)題研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2014年

10 朱雯霏;藝術(shù)作品復(fù)制權(quán)保護(hù)法律初探[D];華東政法大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號(hào)：1387014