【摘要】：對行政自由裁量權控制,其核心要求取消不必要的自由裁量,對必要的自由裁量權進行規(guī)制。勞動行政處罰自由裁量基準是對勞動行政處罰自由裁量權的行使范圍、方式等方面的法律規(guī)范加以具體化,是溝通勞動法律規(guī)范與具體事實之間的必要媒介,也是勞動行政機關理想行使勞動行政處罰自由裁量權的規(guī)制手段。本文通過對勞動法領域的行政處罰自由裁量基準的相關問題進行分析,試圖找到對其進行有效規(guī)制的途徑。文中對勞動行政處罰自由裁量基準概念進行了厘清,認為勞動行政處罰自由裁量的構成分析應從要件和效果兩方面來完成。其中,要件構成包括對事實本身的認定、對行為主體的認定以及對不確定法律概念的解釋;效果構成包括對是否處罰的裁量、對如何處罰的裁量以及對時效和程序的裁量。通過對勞動行政處罰自由裁量權基準的制定背景以及客觀存在的現(xiàn)實狀況分析,探究當下制定勞動行政處罰自由裁量基準的必要性。通過對勞動行政處罰自由裁量基準制定中的法律要件分格技術、量罰幅度裁量技術的比較分析,結合實踐中各地勞動行政執(zhí)法部門的做法,提出了制定勞動行政處罰自由裁量基準的方法,明確了在裁量基準制定過程中需要解決的制定主體、法律效力等相關問題。文章還對勞動行政處罰自由裁量基準的立法規(guī)制、司法監(jiān)督和行政控制等方面進行了分析,提出了完善的建議。 研究勞動行政處罰自由裁量基準的相關問題不是要消滅自由裁量,而是要通過制度、技術的引入,抑制權力的恣意行使,促進裁量基準的理性化。制定勞動保障行政處罰自由裁量基準能克服勞動行政處罰自由裁量的隨意性,抑制行政權力的尋租和腐敗,增強勞動行政處罰決定的正當性,體現(xiàn)形式正義和勞動行政處罰自由裁量的一致性。
[Abstract]:To control the administrative discretion, its core requirement is to cancel the unnecessary discretion and regulate the necessary discretion. The discretionary standard of labor administrative punishment is the embodiment of the scope and mode of the exercise of the discretion of labor administrative punishment, and is the necessary medium between the legal norms of labor law and the concrete facts. It is also an ideal regulatory means for labor administrative organs to exercise the discretion of labor administrative punishment. This paper tries to find an effective way to regulate administrative penalty by analyzing the relevant issues of administrative penalty discretion benchmark in the field of labor law. This paper clarifies the concept of discretion benchmark of labor administrative punishment, and points out that the constitution analysis of labor administrative penalty discretion should be completed from two aspects: elements and effects. Among them, the composition of the elements includes the recognition of the fact itself, the cognizance of the subject of the act and the interpretation of the concept of uncertain law; the component of the effect includes the discretion of whether to punish, the discretion of how to punish and the discretion of the limitation and procedure. Based on the analysis of the background of the establishment of the basis of the discretion of labor administrative punishment and the reality of the objective situation, this paper explores the necessity of establishing the standard of the discretion of the labor administrative punishment at present. Based on the comparative analysis of the legal elements and the discretion techniques in the formulation of the labor administrative penalty discretion standard, and the practice of the labor administrative law enforcement departments in practice, This paper puts forward the method of establishing the discretionary standard of labor administrative punishment, and clarifies the relevant problems such as the subject of establishment, the legal effect and so on, which need to be solved in the process of making the standard of labor administrative punishment. The article also analyzes the legislative regulation, judicial supervision and administrative control of the discretionary standard of labor administrative punishment, and puts forward some perfect suggestions. The research on the discretionary standard of labor administrative punishment is not to eliminate the discretion, but to restrain the arbitrary exercise of power through the introduction of system and technology, and to promote the rationalization of the discretion standard. The establishment of the labor security administrative penalty discretion standard can overcome the arbitrariness of the labor administrative penalty discretion, restrain the rent-seeking and corruption of the administrative power, and enhance the legitimacy of the labor administrative penalty decision. Embodies the form justice and the labor administrative punishment discretion consistency.
【學位授予單位】：蘇州大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D922.1

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 王錫鋅;;行政自由裁量權控制的四個模型——兼論中國行政自由裁量權控制模式的選擇[J];北大法律評論;2009年02期

2 余凌云;;行政裁量的治理——以警察盤查為線索的展開[J];北大法律評論;2009年02期

3 朱新力;唐明良;;尊重與戒懼之間——行政裁量基準在司法審查中的地位[J];北大法律評論;2009年02期

4 季衛(wèi)東;程序比較論[J];比較法研究;1993年01期

5 章志遠;;行政裁量基準的興起與現(xiàn)實課題[J];當代法學;2010年01期

6 廖秋子;;行政自由裁量權的存在悖論與規(guī)范理路[J];東南學術;2010年02期

7 周佑勇;錢卿;;裁量基準在中國的本土實踐——浙江金華行政處罰裁量基準調查研究[J];東南大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2010年04期

8 張千帆;;行政自由裁量權的法律控制——以美國行政法為視角[J];法律科學(西北政法學院學報);2007年03期

9 周佑勇;尹建國;;行政裁量的規(guī)范影響因素——以行政慣例與公共政策為中心[J];湖北社會科學;2008年07期

10 姜明安;;論行政裁量權及其法律規(guī)制[J];湖南社會科學;2009年05期

相關博士學位論文 前1條

1 鄭雅方;行政裁量基準研究[D];吉林大學;2010年

相關碩士學位論文 前2條

1 宋國磊;行政裁量權的授予與阻卻[D];中國政法大學;2009年

2 李銘;論行政自由裁量權的司法監(jiān)督[D];中國政法大學;2009年

，

本文編號：2392083