【摘要】： 非標(biāo)準(zhǔn)勞動(dòng)關(guān)系是從靈活就業(yè)中產(chǎn)生的一類勞動(dòng)關(guān)系,由于其特征相對(duì)于標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的勞動(dòng)關(guān)系發(fā)生了變化,因而不受勞動(dòng)法的規(guī)制。然而,由于其廣泛的吸納勞動(dòng)力,提供了眾多就業(yè)崗位等等,靈活就業(yè)發(fā)展的日益大。但是學(xué)界對(duì)其態(tài)度卻各持己見。特別是伴隨著我國(guó)勞動(dòng)合同法的出臺(tái),學(xué)者們對(duì)非標(biāo)準(zhǔn)勞動(dòng)關(guān)系的爭(zhēng)論愈演愈烈。我們到底應(yīng)該以一種怎樣的態(tài)度來對(duì)待非標(biāo)準(zhǔn)勞動(dòng)關(guān)系,成為我們必須面對(duì)的重大問題,也是一個(gè)難題。本文第一章介紹了學(xué)界有關(guān)非標(biāo)準(zhǔn)勞動(dòng)關(guān)系得爭(zhēng)鳴,部分學(xué)者堅(jiān)決對(duì)其持的否定的態(tài)度,而另外一部分卻正是視其正面作用,因而造成他們對(duì)非標(biāo)準(zhǔn)勞動(dòng)關(guān)系的態(tài)度也有所區(qū)別,有的認(rèn)為法律不應(yīng)當(dāng)進(jìn)行規(guī)制,有的認(rèn)為需要嚴(yán)格的限制,有的認(rèn)為要適度的規(guī)范。筆者贊同適度規(guī)范的觀點(diǎn),在正視其作用的同時(shí),通過立法來避免其負(fù)面效應(yīng),使得其社會(huì)價(jià)值得當(dāng)?shù)陌l(fā)揮。非標(biāo)準(zhǔn)勞動(dòng)關(guān)系在世界廣泛存在,第二章,筆者對(duì)國(guó)家勞工組織對(duì)非標(biāo)準(zhǔn)勞動(dòng)關(guān)系的態(tài)度進(jìn)行研究,發(fā)現(xiàn)國(guó)際勞工組織對(duì)非標(biāo)準(zhǔn)勞動(dòng)關(guān)系也歷經(jīng)了從否定到肯定,從嚴(yán)格限制到適度規(guī)范的過程,并且結(jié)合部分國(guó)家的情況分析了原因。并且總結(jié)出國(guó)際勞工組織對(duì)非標(biāo)準(zhǔn)勞動(dòng)關(guān)系的態(tài)度是放松管制,促使其實(shí)現(xiàn)體面勞動(dòng),這是一種低標(biāo)準(zhǔn)廣覆蓋的思路,本應(yīng)為我國(guó)立法所借鑒。然而從第三章的分析,可以看出我國(guó)勞動(dòng)立法對(duì)靈活中十分重要的勞務(wù)派遣卻反其道而行之,并且對(duì)大量的非標(biāo)準(zhǔn)勞動(dòng)關(guān)系視而不見。第四章,筆者立足國(guó)際勞工組織放松管制,低標(biāo)準(zhǔn)、廣覆蓋的思想,對(duì)我國(guó)的幾種典型存在的非標(biāo)準(zhǔn)勞動(dòng)關(guān)系中做出了一定建議。
[Abstract]:Non-standard labor relation is a kind of labor relation which is produced from flexible employment. Because its characteristics have changed relative to the standard labor relation, it is not regulated by labor law. However, due to its extensive absorption of labor force, provide a large number of jobs and so on, flexible employment development is growing. But scholars hold their own views on their attitudes. Especially with the introduction of labor contract law in China, scholars' argument on non-standard labor relations is becoming more and more serious. What kind of attitude should we take to deal with nonstandard labor relations has become a major problem that we must face, and it is also a difficult problem. The first chapter of this paper introduces the academic circles on the non-standard labor relations to contend, some scholars firmly hold a negative attitude towards it, while the other part is just to see its positive role. As a result, their attitudes towards non-standard labor relations are different, some think that the law should not be regulated, some think that strict restrictions are needed, and others think that they should be properly regulated. The author agrees with the view of moderate norm, facing its function squarely, avoiding its negative effect through legislation, and making its social value play a proper role. Non-standard labor relations exist widely in the world. In the second chapter, the author studies the attitude of the National Labour Organization to the non-standard labor relations, and finds that the International Labour Organization has experienced from negation to affirmation of non-standard labor relations. From strict restriction to moderate standard process, and combined with the situation of some countries to analyze the reasons. It concludes that the attitude of the International Labour Organization to the non-standard labor relations is to relax the control and promote the realization of decent work, which is a kind of low standard and wide coverage idea, which should be used for reference by the legislation of our country. However, from the analysis of the third chapter, we can see that the labor legislation of our country is very important to the flexible labor dispatch, but it does the opposite, and turns a blind eye to a large number of non-standard labor relations. In the fourth chapter, based on the ideas of the International Labour Organization (ILO) on deregulation, low standards and wide coverage, the author makes some suggestions to several typical nonstandard labor relations in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2008
【分類號(hào)】：D922.5

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條

1 胡乾鋒;中國(guó)船員派遣法律問題研究[D];大連海事大學(xué);2010年

2 陳小玲;非標(biāo)準(zhǔn)勞動(dòng)關(guān)系研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2010年

3 聶林艷;論非標(biāo)準(zhǔn)勞動(dòng)關(guān)系的法律規(guī)制[D];華僑大學(xué);2011年

4 謝璐蕓;關(guān)于勞務(wù)派遣的規(guī)范與發(fā)展若干法律問題研究[D];上海社會(huì)科學(xué)院;2010年

5 付淑敏;非全日制勞動(dòng)者同工同酬權(quán)的法律保護(hù)研究[D];中南大學(xué);2012年

6 周正林;非全日制用工制度研究[D];中南大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號(hào)：2176123