本文選題：保密義務(wù) + 商業(yè)秘密��； 參考：《西南政法大學(xué)》2016年碩士論文

【摘要】：商業(yè)秘密是企業(yè)在激烈的市場競爭中取得競爭優(yōu)勢的關(guān)鍵因素,而勞動者的流動極易造成企業(yè)商業(yè)秘密泄露的風(fēng)險,如何在保護商業(yè)秘密與勞動者合法權(quán)益之間進行平衡就顯得尤為重要。我國關(guān)于保密義務(wù)的相關(guān)規(guī)定散見于勞動法、公司法、反不正當(dāng)競爭法等領(lǐng)域,對保密義務(wù)的性質(zhì)、主體以及責(zé)任承擔(dān)的規(guī)定雜亂不一,難以形成體系性的立法認識。例如保密義務(wù)的性質(zhì)是附隨義務(wù)還是約定義務(wù)?另外,對保密義務(wù)的主體認識也不一,我國《公司法》規(guī)定,公司高管不得擅自披露公司的商業(yè)秘密,而《勞動合同法》也將公司高管納入保密義務(wù)的主體范疇,這就引起了公司高管是否屬于勞動者的廣泛爭論,并延伸到對負有保密義務(wù)的勞動者的判斷標準之爭。最終引發(fā)出違反保密義務(wù)的是侵權(quán)還是違約的責(zé)任競合路徑選擇難題。針對上述問題,本文圍繞勞動者保密義務(wù)的性質(zhì)、公司高管勞動主體的確認以及違反保密義務(wù)時的責(zé)任競合問題展開論述,結(jié)合我國勞動者保密義務(wù)的立法與司法發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀,嘗試提出部分解決方案,以此保護企業(yè)的商業(yè)秘密和勞動者的合法權(quán)益。文章正文共分為四個部分。第一部分:該部分以三個涉及勞動法領(lǐng)域、公司法領(lǐng)域、反不正當(dāng)競爭法領(lǐng)域的司法裁判案例,引出文章需要論證的問題。這些問題分別是保密義務(wù)的性質(zhì)認定,公司高管勞動主體的確認以及違反保密義務(wù)時的責(zé)任競合。第二部分:該部分主要從學(xué)術(shù)界現(xiàn)有的關(guān)于保密義務(wù)的理論觀點出發(fā),闡述作為保密義務(wù)理論淵源忠實義務(wù)的相關(guān)內(nèi)容,并對理論界存在的保密義務(wù)性質(zhì)爭議進行展示。除此之外,該部分還包括保密義務(wù)的客體、保密義務(wù)的主體范圍以及違反保密義務(wù),出現(xiàn)責(zé)任競合時的路徑選擇等內(nèi)容。第三部分:該部分主要從立法和司法兩個層面出發(fā):一方面,列舉我國現(xiàn)行涉及保密義務(wù)的法律、地方性法規(guī)、部門規(guī)章,反映出我國保密義務(wù)的立法現(xiàn)狀;另一方面,運用三組案例數(shù)據(jù)直觀展現(xiàn)勞動者保密義務(wù)的司法裁判現(xiàn)狀。第四部分:該部分主要結(jié)合前三個部分關(guān)于保密義務(wù)存在的問題以及立法、司法現(xiàn)狀,提出以下建議:明確離職勞動者是否負有保密義務(wù)的判斷標準,確定受勞動法調(diào)整的公司高管的范圍,明晰其他負有保密義務(wù)的勞動者的判定標準,明確侵權(quán)責(zé)任與違約責(zé)任競合時的路徑。
[Abstract]:Trade secret is the key factor for enterprises to gain competitive advantage in the fierce market competition, and the mobility of workers can easily lead to the risk of leakage of business secrets. How to balance the protection of trade secrets with the legitimate rights and interests of workers is particularly important. The relevant provisions on the obligation of confidentiality in China are scattered in the fields of labor law, company law, anti-unfair competition law, and so on. The nature, subject and responsibility of the obligation of confidentiality are mixed, so it is difficult to form a systematic legislative understanding. For example, is the nature of the obligation of confidentiality an collateral obligation or an agreed obligation? In addition, there is also a different understanding of the subject of the obligation of confidentiality. According to the Company Law of our country, company executives may not disclose the company's trade secrets without authorization, and the Labor contract Law also includes senior executives in the subject category of the duty of confidentiality. This has led to widespread debate about whether corporate executives belong to workers and extend to disputes over criteria for workers with confidentiality obligations. The ultimate cause of breach of confidentiality obligation is tort or breach of contract liability competing path choice problem. In view of the above problems, this paper focuses on the nature of the employee's obligation to keep secret, the confirmation of the principal part of the company's senior management and the problem of the concurrence of the responsibility when violating the duty of confidentiality, combining with the present situation of the legislation and judicial development of the duty of confidentiality of the laborer in China. Try to put forward some solutions to protect the business secrets of enterprises and the legitimate rights and interests of workers. The text of the article is divided into four parts. In the first part, three cases involving the field of labor law, the field of company law and the field of anti-unfair competition law are introduced, which lead to the problems that need to be demonstrated. These problems are the nature of confidentiality obligations, the confirmation of the main body of senior executives and the concurrence of responsibilities when violating the obligation of confidentiality. The second part: this part mainly from the academic theory point of view on the obligations of confidentiality, elaborated as the theoretical origin of the obligations of confidentiality obligations related content, and the nature of confidentiality obligations in the theoretical circle of controversy is demonstrated. In addition, this part also includes the object of the obligation of confidentiality, the scope of the subject of the obligation of confidentiality and the choice of path when the duty of confidentiality is violated. Part three: this part mainly starts from the two aspects of legislation and judicature: on the one hand, it enumerates the existing laws, local regulations and departmental regulations concerning the obligation of confidentiality in our country, which reflect the current legislative situation of the obligation of confidentiality in our country; on the other hand, Use three groups of case data intuitively to show the labor confidentiality obligations of the status quo of judicial adjudication. Part IV: this part mainly combines the problems of the first three parts about the obligation of confidentiality and the current situation of legislation and judicature, and puts forward the following suggestions: make clear whether the former workers have the judgment standard of the obligation of confidentiality. Determine the scope of the company's top executives adjusted by labor laws, clarify the criteria for other workers with confidentiality obligations, and clarify the path of competing liability for tort and breach of contract.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號】：D920.5;D922.291.91;D922.5

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 沈燁;論銀行的保密義務(wù)[J];河北經(jīng)貿(mào)大學(xué)學(xué)報;2000年05期

2 馮，

本文編號：2100006