本文選題：勞動(dòng)爭議 + 非訴訟模式　； 參考：《南昌大學(xué)》2010年碩士論文

【摘要】：勞動(dòng)爭議是勞動(dòng)者與用人單位之間所發(fā)生的爭議,勞動(dòng)者與用人單位之間的勞動(dòng)關(guān)系是非常普遍基本的社會關(guān)系,各國都十分重視對勞動(dòng)爭議的處理,出臺了一系列的法律對勞動(dòng)爭議的處理予以保障,對勞動(dòng)爭議處理法律制度的研究也成為法學(xué)界的重要課題,理論研究的成果反過來又促進(jìn)了立法的完善,2007年被稱為我國的勞動(dòng)立法年,出臺了一系列勞動(dòng)法律法規(guī),其中的《中華人民共和國勞動(dòng)爭議仲裁調(diào)解法》從2008年起實(shí)施,更是從立法層面上對勞動(dòng)爭議仲裁和勞動(dòng)爭議調(diào)解作了很大的改進(jìn),通過構(gòu)建社會化的調(diào)解網(wǎng)絡(luò)、賦予勞動(dòng)爭議調(diào)解協(xié)議法律效力、去除勞動(dòng)爭議仲裁委員會的行政化色彩、規(guī)定特定情況下實(shí)行一裁終局以及一些案件的舉證責(zé)任由用人單位來承擔(dān)等來達(dá)到提高解決勞動(dòng)爭議效果的目的。但該法實(shí)施兩年來,在實(shí)踐中也突出地暴露出一些問題,嚴(yán)重地影響勞動(dòng)爭議的處理效果,違背了改革的初衷。筆者認(rèn)為我國實(shí)行的協(xié)商、調(diào)解、先裁后審的勞動(dòng)爭議處理法律機(jī)制既有非訴訟模式又有訴訟模式,適應(yīng)勞動(dòng)爭議處理的需要,每種爭議處理程序都有其優(yōu)勢所在,但由于各種原因,導(dǎo)致了協(xié)商、調(diào)解、仲裁、訴訟四種程序各自的優(yōu)勢沒有能夠充分地發(fā)揮,造成了司法實(shí)踐中勞動(dòng)爭議處理程序極為復(fù)雜的局面,勞動(dòng)者的維權(quán)之路十分艱難,因此,完善我國的勞動(dòng)爭議處理法律機(jī)制,筆者認(rèn)為關(guān)鍵是如何把握各種處理模式之間的關(guān)系以及去除弊端完善其制度,筆者以消除各種模式的弊端,使得各種爭議處理程序有效銜接為視角從催化自主協(xié)商機(jī)制,做實(shí)協(xié)商；改革調(diào)解制度,充分發(fā)揮調(diào)解在勞動(dòng)爭議處理中的長處；強(qiáng)化仲裁協(xié)議的法律效力,使得仲裁與訴訟銜接順暢；改革勞動(dòng)爭議訴訟程序等方面提出了完善我國勞動(dòng)爭議處理法律機(jī)制的思考。提出構(gòu)建適合我國國情、勞動(dòng)關(guān)系特征,能夠?qū)崿F(xiàn)多元化模式有效結(jié)合是我國勞動(dòng)爭議處理法律機(jī)制的最佳選擇。完善勞動(dòng)爭議處理法律機(jī)制,是貫徹社會主義法治理念,實(shí)現(xiàn)法治的法律效果與社會效果統(tǒng)一的要求,對促進(jìn)和諧社會建設(shè)具有積極意義。
[Abstract]:Labor dispute is a dispute between laborer and employer. The labor relationship between laborer and employing unit is a very common basic social relationship. All countries attach great importance to the handling of labor dispute. A series of laws have been issued to protect the handling of labor disputes, and the research on the legal system of handling labor disputes has also become an important subject in the legal circle. In turn, the results of theoretical research have promoted the perfection of legislation. In 2007, it was called the Labor legislation year of our country, and issued a series of labor laws and regulations, among which, the Labor dispute Arbitration Mediation Law of the people's Republic of China has been implemented since 2008. From the legislative level, the labor dispute arbitration and labor dispute mediation have been greatly improved. Through the construction of a socialized mediation network, the legal effect of the labor dispute mediation agreement has been given, and the administrative color of the labor dispute arbitration committee has been removed. In order to achieve the purpose of improving the effect of resolving labor disputes, it is stipulated that the burden of proof in some cases is to be borne by the employing unit under certain circumstances. However, since the law was put into practice for two years, some problems have been exposed in practice, which have seriously affected the effect of labor dispute resolution and violated the original intention of the reform. The author thinks that the legal mechanism of labor dispute settlement which is implemented in our country is not only non-litigation mode but also litigation mode, which meets the needs of labor dispute resolution, and each kind of dispute handling procedure has its own advantages. However, due to various reasons, the advantages of the four procedures of consultation, mediation, arbitration and litigation have not been brought into full play, resulting in a very complicated situation of labor dispute handling procedures in judicial practice. Therefore, to perfect the legal mechanism of labor dispute handling in our country, the author thinks that the key is how to grasp the relationship between all kinds of handling modes and how to remove the disadvantages and improve the system. In order to eliminate the malpractice of various modes and make the effective connection of various dispute handling procedures as the visual angle from the perspective of catalytic independent negotiation mechanism, the author makes the actual negotiation, reform the mediation system, and give full play to the advantages of mediation in labor dispute handling. Strengthen the legal effect of arbitration agreement, make arbitration and litigation link smoothly, reform the procedure of labor dispute litigation, and put forward the thought of perfecting the legal mechanism of labor dispute handling in our country. It is suggested that it is the best choice for the legal mechanism of labor dispute processing in China to construct the effective combination of diversified modes and the characteristics of labor relations suitable for China's national conditions. Perfecting the legal mechanism of handling labor disputes is the requirement of carrying out the idea of socialist rule of law and realizing the unity of legal effect and social effect of rule of law. It is of positive significance to promote the construction of harmonious society.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南昌大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：D922.5

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 高海榮;;論我國勞動(dòng)爭議解決機(jī)制的現(xiàn)狀及完善[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2012年10期

，

本文編號：2096103