本文選題：請求權(quán)競合 + 工傷保險賠償請求權(quán)��； 參考：《復旦大學》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：現(xiàn)代社會中,隨著各國法律制度的健全,對于工傷事故人身傷害的處理出現(xiàn)了多元的賠償機制,出現(xiàn)了工傷保險賠償與人身侵權(quán)損害賠償并存的局面。在工傷保險賠償請求權(quán)與人身侵權(quán)損害賠償請求權(quán)發(fā)生競合時,各國采取了不同的處理模式,主要分為選擇模式、兼得模式、補充模式和替代模式。我國現(xiàn)階段在處理工傷事故時,關(guān)于工傷保險賠償請求權(quán)與人身侵權(quán)損害賠償請求權(quán)的競合問題,由于現(xiàn)行相關(guān)法律卻沒有做出明確具體的規(guī)定,而地方立法和各級政府的行政立法所規(guī)定的處理模式各異,導致各地司法實踐不統(tǒng)一,出現(xiàn)了“同命不同償”的現(xiàn)象,影響了法律的統(tǒng)一性和權(quán)威性。研究工傷保險賠償請求權(quán)與人身侵權(quán)損害妣償請求權(quán)的性質(zhì)和兩者的關(guān)系,確定統(tǒng)一的處理模式,充分發(fā)揮各項制度的功能,不僅有利于保障我國勞動者合法權(quán)益,穩(wěn)定和改善勞動關(guān)系,而且有利于我國社會主義法治建設(shè)。由于民法領(lǐng)域的請求權(quán)競合理論的研究核心正是關(guān)于一個生活事件受多個法律規(guī)范評價時的處理,因此,借鑒吸收請求權(quán)競合理論的相關(guān)學說成就,對研究處理工傷保險賠償請求權(quán)與人身侵權(quán)損害賠償請求權(quán)之間的關(guān)系具有重要意義。 本文共分為四章。第一章是關(guān)于請求權(quán)競合理論以及其對工傷保險賠償請求權(quán)與人身侵權(quán)損害賠償請求競合處理的啟示。通過介紹評析請求權(quán)競合的主要學說,提出了請求權(quán)競合的實質(zhì)是法律規(guī)范的競合,而同一生活事實只能產(chǎn)生一個請求權(quán),不能重復評價,進而提出了請求權(quán)競合理論對工傷保險賠償請求權(quán)與人身侵權(quán)損害賠償請求競合的啟示,即從法律規(guī)范角度解決兩種請求權(quán)競合問題和禁止重復評價。 第二章是關(guān)于工傷保險賠償請求權(quán)與人身侵權(quán)損害賠償請求權(quán)之競合。本章主要先從工傷救濟制度的發(fā)展歷程上分析工傷保險賠償請求權(quán)基礎(chǔ)與人身侵權(quán)損害賠償請求權(quán)基礎(chǔ)的差異,再從賠償義務主體、救濟途徑、價值定位等多方面分析了兩種請求權(quán)的差異。 第三章是關(guān)于各國對兩種請求權(quán)競合的處理模式。首先介紹并評析了各國對兩種請求權(quán)競合的四種模式,即選擇模式、替代模式、兼得模式和補充模式；然后法律規(guī)范、行政立法和地方性法規(guī)和最高法院制定的相關(guān)規(guī)定三個層面,分析了我國立法實踐中對兩種請求權(quán)競合處理中不足；最后介紹并評析了我國學者對兩種請求權(quán)競合處理的觀點。 第四章是關(guān)于制度建立的建議。本章主要是對構(gòu)建解決工傷保險賠償請求權(quán)與人身侵權(quán)賠償請求權(quán)競合制度設(shè)想,確立了公平、效率、充分賠償及工傷保險賠償優(yōu)先四大原則,并提出了構(gòu)建附帶追償權(quán)的工傷保險統(tǒng)一賠償制度的設(shè)想。
[Abstract]:In modern society, with the improvement of the legal system of various countries, there is a pluralistic compensation mechanism for dealing with personal injury caused by industrial accidents, and a situation of coexistence of compensation for injury insurance and compensation for personal infringement. When the claim for compensation for industrial injury insurance is competing with the claim for compensation for personal tort, different countries adopt different treatment modes, which are mainly divided into three modes: selective mode, concurrent mode, supplementary mode and alternative mode. At the present stage of dealing with industrial accidents in our country, there is no clear and specific regulation on the concurrence between the right to claim for compensation for injury insurance and the right to claim compensation for damages caused by personal infringement, because the existing relevant laws have not made clear and specific provisions. However, the local legislation and the administrative legislation of all levels of government have different handling modes, which leads to the disunity of judicial practice in various places, and the phenomenon of "different compensation for the same destiny", which affects the unity and authority of the law. The study of the nature and the relationship between the claim for compensation for injury insurance and the right to claim compensation for personal injury caused by personal infringement, the determination of a unified treatment model and the full play of the functions of the various systems are not only conducive to the protection of the legitimate rights and interests of workers in our country. Stable and improve labor relations, but also conducive to China's socialist construction of the rule of law. Since the core of the theory of competing claims in the field of civil law is how to deal with a life event when it is evaluated by multiple legal norms, the achievements of the relevant theories of absorbing the theory of competing claim are used for reference. It is of great significance to study and deal with the relationship between the claim for compensation for injury insurance and the claim for compensation for personal tort. This paper is divided into four chapters. The first chapter is about the theory of concurrence of claim right and its inspiration to the concurrent processing of claim for compensation for injury insurance and compensation for personal tort. By introducing the main theories of appraising the concurrence of claim rights, this paper puts forward that the essence of competing claims right is the concurrence of legal norms, but the same life fact can only produce one claim right, not repeated evaluation. Furthermore, the author puts forward the inspiration of the theory of competing claims for the right of claim to compensation for industrial injury insurance and the claim for personal tort damages, that is, to solve the problem of two kinds of claims from the angle of legal norms and to prohibit repeated evaluation. Chapter two is about the concurrence of the claim right of industrial injury insurance and the claim right of personal tort. This chapter first analyzes the differences between the basis of claim for compensation for industrial injury insurance and the basis of claim for compensation for personal infringement from the development course of the system of compensation for industrial injury, and then from the subject of compensation obligation, the way of relief. Value orientation and other aspects of the analysis of the difference between the two claims. The third chapter is about the processing mode of the two kinds of claims. First of all, it introduces and evaluates the four modes of competing for two kinds of claims, that is, the choice mode, the substitution model, the concurrent mode and the supplementary mode, and then the legal norms. From three aspects of administrative legislation, local laws and regulations and the relevant provisions made by the Supreme Court, this paper analyzes the deficiencies in the handling of the two kinds of claims in the legislative practice of our country, and finally introduces and evaluates the views of Chinese scholars on the handling of the two kinds of claims. The fourth chapter is about the system establishment suggestion. This chapter is mainly to construct the system of solving the competing system of the claim for compensation for industrial injury insurance and the right to claim for personal tort, and establish four principles of fairness, efficiency, full compensation and priority of compensation for industrial injury insurance. And put forward the idea of constructing the unified compensation system of industrial injury insurance with the right of recovery.
【學位授予單位】：復旦大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D923;D922.5

【引證文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 肖紅艷;;侵權(quán)損害賠償與工傷保險賠償競合探析[J];知識經(jīng)濟;2013年07期

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前2條

1 賀春花;工傷保險補償請求權(quán)與人身損害賠償請求權(quán)的關(guān)系研究[D];浙江工商大學;2012年

2 李麗群;第三人侵權(quán)時的工傷賠償與責任承擔[D];黑龍江大學;2012年

，

本文編號：1972001