論事實勞動關(guān)系的法律保護
發(fā)布時間:2018-05-06 21:45
本文選題:事實勞動關(guān)系 + 勞動合同; 參考:《復(fù)旦大學(xué)》2009年碩士論文
【摘要】: 我國《勞動法》規(guī)定,用人單位與勞動者建立勞動關(guān)系,必須簽訂勞動合同,但在現(xiàn)實生活中,用人單位沒有與勞動者簽訂勞動合同,但雙方已經(jīng)實際履行了勞動法規(guī)定的權(quán)利義務(wù),形成了事實勞動關(guān)系的現(xiàn)象相當普遍。隨著經(jīng)濟社會的發(fā)展,事實勞動關(guān)系的外延還在擴大,而我國理論界對于事實勞動關(guān)系的概念和效力等問題觀點不一。因此,有必要加強對事實勞動關(guān)系的研究,解決事實勞動關(guān)系的界定與保護問題,以保障勞動者合法利益,維持社會穩(wěn)定。本文從事實勞動關(guān)系的內(nèi)涵和外延入手,理清事實勞動關(guān)系的概念,明確事實勞動關(guān)系的構(gòu)成要件和適用范圍,揭示事實勞動關(guān)系與相關(guān)法律關(guān)系的區(qū)別,全面完成對事實勞動關(guān)系的界定。運用理論分析的方法對事實勞動關(guān)系的相關(guān)理論及對其進行法律保護的問題加以研究論證。運用比較研究的方法對不同國家和地區(qū)有關(guān)事實勞動關(guān)系的立法情況進行描述,尤其對我國《勞動合同法》實施前后有關(guān)事實勞動關(guān)系的規(guī)定進行梳理,給予客觀的評價,并揭示其中的問題。最后沿著“全面保護論”的思路,根據(jù)我國事實勞動關(guān)系的具體情況,從勞動立法的角度,提出對事實勞動關(guān)系予以法律保護的建議。 本文共分四章。 第一章事實勞動關(guān)系的界定。本章介紹了事實勞動關(guān)系的由來,在總結(jié)理論界、實務(wù)界對事實勞動關(guān)系不同定義的基礎(chǔ)上,就事實勞動關(guān)系的概念給出自己的觀點,即事實勞動關(guān)系指無書面勞動合同或者因履行無效勞動合同而存在的一種勞動關(guān)系。通過剖析事實勞動關(guān)系的內(nèi)涵和外延以及比較事實勞動關(guān)系與相關(guān)社會關(guān)系的區(qū)別,進一步明確對事實勞動關(guān)系的界定。 第二章事實勞動關(guān)系的相關(guān)理論。本章首先介紹了最早提出“事實契約”的德國事實契約關(guān)系理論,揭示其理論意義在于保護法律關(guān)系中弱勢群體的利益。之后歸納出我國關(guān)于事實勞動關(guān)系的三種不同理論觀點即“無效論”、“模式轉(zhuǎn)化論”和“全面保護論”,指出“無效論”、“模式轉(zhuǎn)化論”存在的缺陷,從法理、勞動法及勞動合同三個角度分析了“全面保護論”的合理性。 第三章事實勞動關(guān)系的立法比較。本章分別從對勞動合同的形式要求、對無效勞動合同的態(tài)度和對事實勞動關(guān)系的處理三個方面,介紹了不同國家、地區(qū)的事實勞動關(guān)系立法情況。揭示和歸納了當今世界對于事實勞動關(guān)系予以法律保護的主流態(tài)度和基本調(diào)整模式。在對我國事實勞動關(guān)系立法現(xiàn)狀的梳理中,著重分析了《勞動合同法》針對事實勞動關(guān)系的調(diào)整方法和特點,總結(jié)了我國事實勞動關(guān)系的立法現(xiàn)狀及存在的問題。 第四章事實勞動關(guān)系法律保護的建議。本章從勞動立法角度就如何完善我國事實勞動關(guān)系的法律保護提出了構(gòu)想。首先,明確事實勞動關(guān)系的法律地位,將其直接納入勞動法調(diào)整范圍。同時,調(diào)整與事實勞動關(guān)系相關(guān)的規(guī)則,預(yù)防、減少事實勞動關(guān)系的發(fā)生。另外,構(gòu)建事實勞動關(guān)系的規(guī)則,對已發(fā)生的事實勞動關(guān)系進行全面調(diào)整。從而使事實勞動關(guān)系得到平等、有效的保護。
[Abstract]:In China, the labor law stipulates that the employer and the laborer should establish labor relations, and the labor contract must be signed, but in real life, the employers have not signed labor contracts with the workers, but the two sides have actually fulfilled the rights and obligations stipulated in the labor law, and the phenomenon of the fact is quite common. With the development of the economic and social development. The extension of the factual labor relations is still expanding, and the theoretical circles of our country have different views on the concept and effectiveness of the factual labor relations. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen the research on the factual labor relations, to solve the problem of the definition and protection of the factual labor relations, in order to ensure the legitimate interests of the workers and maintain social stability. The connotation and extension of the relationship, clear the concept of the factual labor relations, clear the elements and scope of the factual labor relations, reveal the difference between the factual labor relations and the relevant legal relations, and complete the definition of the factual labor relations in an all-round way. The problem of law protection is studied and demonstrated. The legislative situation of the factual labor relations in different countries and regions is described by the method of comparative study, especially to the relevant provisions of the labor contract law before and after the implementation of the labor contract law in China, to give an objective evaluation, and to reveal the problems. According to the actual situation of our country's actual labor relations, from the perspective of labor legislation, we put forward proposals for legal protection of factual labor relations.
This article is divided into four chapters.
The first chapter is the definition of the factual labor relations. This chapter introduces the origin of the factual labor relations. In the summary of the theoretical circle, on the basis of the different definitions of factual labor relations, the practice circles give their own views on the concept of factual labor relations, that is, the fact labor relation refers to the existence of no written labor contract or the existence of an invalid labor contract. Through the analysis of the connotation and extension of the factual labor relations and the difference between the factual labor relations and the related social relations, the definition of the factual labor relations is further clarified.
The second chapter is about the theory of factual labor relations. In this chapter, the first German fact contract theory is introduced. The theoretical significance lies in the protection of the interests of the disadvantaged groups in the legal relationship. After that, the three different theoretical views on factual labor relations are summed up, "the theory of invalidity", "model". "The theory of transformation" and "the theory of comprehensive protection", point out the defects of "theory of inefficiency" and "the theory of pattern transformation", and analyze the rationality of the "comprehensive protection theory" from three angles of jurisprudence, labor law and labor contract.
The third chapter is the legislative comparison of the factual labor relations. This chapter introduces the legislative situation of the factual labor relations in different countries and regions from three aspects of the form requirements of the labor contract, the attitude to the invalid labor contract and the handling of the factual labor relations, and reveals and summarizes the legal protection of the factual labor relations in the present world. The mainstream attitude and the basic adjustment mode. In the combing of the current situation of the legislation of the factual labor relations in China, the paper emphatically analyzes the adjustment methods and characteristics of the labor contract law for the factual labor relations, and summarizes the current legislation and existing problems of the factual labor relations in China.
The fourth chapter is the suggestion of the legal protection of the factual labor relations. This chapter puts forward the idea of how to improve the legal protection of our country's factual labor relations from the angle of labor legislation. First, make clear the legal status of the factual labor relations, and bring it directly into the adjustment range of labor law. At the same time, it will adjust the rules related to the factual labor relations, prevent and reduce the matter. In addition, the rules of building factual labor relations are set up to make a comprehensive adjustment to the actual labor relations that have happened so that the factual labor relations are equal and effectively protected.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:復(fù)旦大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2009
【分類號】:D922.5
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 徐妍;事實勞動關(guān)系基本問題探析[J];當代法學(xué);2003年03期
2 林嘉;;勞動合同若干法律問題研究[J];法學(xué)家;2003年06期
3 但昭文,,蘇民益;勞動爭議案件舉證責任探討[J];法學(xué)評論;1996年01期
4 王全興,吳文芳;《最高人民法院關(guān)于審理勞動爭議案件適用法律若干問題的解釋》的不足及其完善建議[J];法學(xué);2002年10期
5 姜穎;;勞動合同形式探析[J];中國勞動關(guān)系學(xué)院學(xué)報;2006年01期
6 壽新寶;關(guān)于事實勞動關(guān)系保護的法律思考[J];甘肅政法成人教育學(xué)院學(xué)報;2002年02期
7 李凌云;;對我國事實勞動關(guān)系立法的反思[J];華東政法大學(xué)學(xué)報;2008年06期
8 柯湘;略論事實勞動關(guān)系——兼談《勞動法》的完善[J];中國勞動;2000年06期
9 董保華;論事實勞動關(guān)系[J];中國勞動;2004年07期
10 馮彥君;;口頭勞動合同法律效力和事實勞動關(guān)系法律效果[J];中國勞動;2006年01期
本文編號:1854034
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/laodongfa/1854034.html
最近更新
教材專著