本文選題：勞動(dòng)者自發(fā)維權(quán)組織 + 合法性��； 參考：《浙江大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：我國現(xiàn)行勞動(dòng)法律并沒有對(duì)勞動(dòng)者自發(fā)維權(quán)組織作出具體規(guī)定,然而規(guī)范勞動(dòng)者自發(fā)維權(quán)組織既有利于多渠道保障勞動(dòng)者權(quán)益,也有利于實(shí)現(xiàn)勞資糾紛非暴力解決,因而有必要在法律中確立勞動(dòng)者自發(fā)維權(quán)組織制度。 筆者為勞動(dòng)者自發(fā)維權(quán)組織進(jìn)行概念界定,并歸納現(xiàn)階段我國勞動(dòng)者自發(fā)維權(quán)組織現(xiàn)狀以及分析其產(chǎn)生的原因。 根據(jù)現(xiàn)狀,筆者概括出勞動(dòng)者自發(fā)維權(quán)組織面臨的五大法律困境,即主體合法性待定；主體獨(dú)立性模糊；組織權(quán)利義務(wù)界定不明晰；組織治理結(jié)構(gòu)不規(guī)范以及組織維權(quán)成果無保障,本文逐一對(duì)上述法律困境進(jìn)行分析。 本文的新意在于解決勞動(dòng)者自發(fā)維權(quán)組織五大法律困境。筆者在檢索國內(nèi)現(xiàn)有文獻(xiàn)并綜合借鑒日本、德國、英國及我國臺(tái)灣地區(qū)學(xué)者學(xué)說的基礎(chǔ)上,借鑒域外法,結(jié)合我國現(xiàn)有法律,提出通過增設(shè)法律條款以賦予勞動(dòng)者自發(fā)維權(quán)組織法律合法性,并通過轉(zhuǎn)變政府職能等維護(hù)勞動(dòng)者自發(fā)維權(quán)組織獨(dú)立性,設(shè)定制度保障維權(quán)成果。同時(shí),本文還為勞動(dòng)者自發(fā)維權(quán)組織量身定制權(quán)利義務(wù)以及參考公司制度設(shè)計(jì)勞動(dòng)者自發(fā)維權(quán)組織的治理機(jī)構(gòu)以便其規(guī)范運(yùn)作。通過勞動(dòng)者自發(fā)維權(quán)組織外部環(huán)境和內(nèi)部環(huán)境雙管齊下提出解決思路來完善健全組織合法性；明確認(rèn)定組織獨(dú)立性；切實(shí)保障組織維權(quán)成果；清晰界定組織權(quán)利義務(wù)；規(guī)范設(shè)計(jì)組織治理結(jié)構(gòu)。根據(jù)不同的法律困境,筆者設(shè)計(jì)不同的途徑,從而保證勞動(dòng)者自發(fā)維權(quán)組織具體可操作。
[Abstract]:The current labor law of our country has not made the concrete stipulation to the laborer's spontaneous rights organization. However, standardizing the laborer's spontaneous rights organization is not only beneficial to protect the rights and interests of the laborer through many channels, but also beneficial to the non-violent settlement of the labor dispute. Therefore, it is necessary to establish the system of workers' spontaneous rights-safeguarding organizations in the law. The author defines the concept of the workers' spontaneous rights organization, and sums up the present situation of the workers' spontaneous rights organization in our country and analyzes the reasons for its emergence. According to the present situation, the author generalizes the five legal dilemmas that workers' spontaneous rights organizations are facing, that is, the legitimacy of the subject is to be determined, the independence of the subject is vague, the definition of the rights and obligations of the organization is not clear; The organization governance structure is not standard and the organization rights protection achievement is not guaranteed, this paper analyzes the above legal dilemma one by one. The new idea of this paper is to solve the five legal dilemmas of the workers'spontaneous rights organizations. On the basis of retrieving the existing domestic literature and synthetically learning from the scholars' theories of Japan, Germany, Britain and Taiwan, the author draws lessons from the extraterritorial law and combines the existing laws of our country. It is proposed that the legal legitimacy of workers' spontaneous rights organizations should be given by adding legal provisions, and the independence of workers' spontaneous rights organizations should be safeguarded by changing the functions of the government, and the system should be set up to guarantee the achievements of safeguarding rights. At the same time, this paper also customizes the rights and obligations for the workers' spontaneous rights organizations and designs the governance institutions of the workers' spontaneous rights organizations in order to regulate their operation. Through the laborer's spontaneous rights organization external environment and the internal environment two ways of thinking are put forward to perfect and perfect the organization legitimacy; clearly identify the organizational independence; ensure the organization rights protection achievements; clearly define the organization rights and obligations; Standardize the design of organizational governance structure. According to the different legal dilemma, the author designs different ways to ensure the laborers' spontaneous organization can be operated.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：浙江大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D922.5

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 楊世平;;試談工會(huì)在勞動(dòng)關(guān)系中的定位[J];兵團(tuán)工運(yùn);2006年02期

2 余章寶;楊淑娣;;我國農(nóng)民工維權(quán)NGO現(xiàn)狀及困境——以珠三角地區(qū)為例[J];東南學(xué)術(shù);2011年01期

3 汪習(xí)根;;化解社會(huì)矛盾的法律機(jī)制創(chuàng)新[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2011年02期

4 王國珍;;影響和制約農(nóng)民工加入工會(huì)的因素[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(下旬刊);2009年04期

5 陸紅;;論工會(huì)職能及發(fā)揮工會(huì)效用存在的問題[J];法制與社會(huì);2009年21期

6 郭楓;邵亞雄;高磊;;從網(wǎng)絡(luò)公益組織看中國“草根”非政府組織的合法性問題[J];法制與社會(huì);2011年03期

7 董保華;;規(guī)范勞動(dòng)者維權(quán)行動(dòng)的制度選擇[J];法治研究;2012年01期

8 張s，

本文編號(hào)：1805042