本文選題：拒不支付勞動報酬　切入點：勞動者　出處：《中國青年政治學(xué)院》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：我國對拒不支付勞動報酬行為（下文簡稱“欠薪”）入罪與否進(jìn)行了長時間的理論研究和探討。傳統(tǒng)觀點認(rèn)為，“欠薪”行為是以債權(quán)債務(wù)為前提的民事糾紛，在民法、勞動法等領(lǐng)域可以繼續(xù)進(jìn)行法律完善，刑法入罪意義不大，并不能解決根本問題；支持者認(rèn)為，“欠薪”行為嚴(yán)重侵害勞動者的合法權(quán)益，引發(fā)眾多群體性事件，已經(jīng)成為影響社會安定的重要隱患，刑法入罪能對其起到有效的遏制作用，更好維護(hù)社會的穩(wěn)定，保護(hù)勞動者自身權(quán)益；還有折中者認(rèn)為，，“欠薪”行為是否需要納入刑法調(diào)整范圍，還需要進(jìn)行調(diào)研，立法是有步驟的，還要考慮實操性等。以上爭論究竟孰是孰非，立法機(jī)關(guān)已經(jīng)給出了答案。2011年2月25日，《刑法修正案(八)》將“惡意欠薪”行為列入侵犯財產(chǎn)罪一章中，作為第276條之一，并正式確定為“拒不支付勞動報酬罪”。該罪一出臺，就引起了學(xué)術(shù)界和司法界的廣泛關(guān)注，對本罪的理論依據(jù)和適用規(guī)范進(jìn)行探討。隨著2013年1月《最高人民法院關(guān)于審理拒不支付勞動報酬刑事案件適用法律若干問題的解釋（》以下簡稱《拒不支付勞動報酬案件解釋》）出臺，針對拒不支付勞動報酬罪所涉及的概念界定、定罪量刑標(biāo)準(zhǔn)、單位犯罪等問題，進(jìn)一步明確了相關(guān)刑事案件的法律適用標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。然而新罪入刑，對本罪的探討僅僅限于刑法學(xué)的一般講述，對某些基本概念的定性還未達(dá)成統(tǒng)一共識，缺乏配套制度和司法標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，阻礙了其發(fā)揮應(yīng)有的威懾力，該罪名的完善工作有待更深層次的探討。 本文適當(dāng)采用文獻(xiàn)研究法和比較研究法，以現(xiàn)有文獻(xiàn)、政策法規(guī)和地方性檔案材料的總結(jié)和概括為基礎(chǔ)，以勞動法所調(diào)整的勞動關(guān)系為背景，從刑法理論著手，結(jié)合勞動法和行政法規(guī)等相關(guān)法律規(guī)定對拒不支付勞動報酬罪構(gòu)成要件進(jìn)行辨析，對模糊概念進(jìn)行界定，解決司法實踐中適用本罪的若干問題，以期能夠有助于法律的完善。 本文共分為三個部分，從拒不支付勞動報酬罪的立法背景、理論支持、構(gòu)成要件和司法認(rèn)定等方面進(jìn)行由淺入深的探討，試圖在匯集他人觀點的同時進(jìn)行歸納總結(jié)，得出自己的結(jié)論。第一部分，梳理本罪的立法進(jìn)程，明確本罪入罪的理論依據(jù)。第二部分，對犯罪構(gòu)成進(jìn)行全面分析，對條文中的模糊概念進(jìn)行界定。第三部分，在認(rèn)定犯罪構(gòu)成的基礎(chǔ)上進(jìn)一步明確罪與罪之間的區(qū)別、以及結(jié)果加重犯的成立、量刑情節(jié)的考量等。
[Abstract]:Our country does not pay remuneration to refuse (hereinafter referred to as "wages") were studied theoretically and discussed the long time the crime or not. The traditional view that "wages" is the debt to the creditor is the premise of civil disputes in the civil law, labor law and other fields can continue in the perfection of the law, the criminal law the crime is not meaningful, and can not solve the fundamental problem; supporters believe that the "wages" serious infringement of the legitimate rights and interests of workers, causing many mass incidents, has a significant impact on social stability, the crime of criminal law can effectively curb the better, maintain social stability, protect the rights and interests of workers; and the compromise that the "wages" whether need to be included in the scope of the criminal law, but also the need for research, legislation is step by step, but also consider the practical operation. The above arguments is actually right, legislation Authorities have been given the answer.2011 in February 25th, "criminal law amendment (eight) >" malicious wages "included in the crime of property violation in the chapter, as one of 276th, and formally identified as the crime of refusing to pay labor remuneration." the introduction of a crime, has aroused widespread concern in academic and law the theoretical basis of this crime and the applicable codes are discussed. With the January 2013 "the Supreme People's Court on the trial of refusing to pay labor remuneration applicable law in Criminal Cases Interpretation of several issues (hereinafter referred to as < > cases on refusing to pay labor remuneration of Taiwan, explanation >) for the concept of crime of refusing to pay labor remuneration to the definition and the standard of conviction and sentencing, unit crime, to further clarify the law applicable standards related to criminal cases. However, the new crime penalty, study of the crime is only limited to the general about criminal law, for some basic concepts Qualitative consensus has not yet been reached. Lack of supporting system and judicial standard hinders its effective deterrence. The perfection of the accusation needs further exploration.
In this paper, using the appropriate method of literature research and comparative study, based on the existing literature, policies and regulations and local archival materials are summarized and based on the labor law to adjust labor relations as the background, starting from the theory of criminal law, combined with the relevant provisions of the labor law and the law administrative regulations for refusing to pay labor remuneration crime analysis, the definition of fuzzy concept, solve some problems of the application in judicial practice, in order to help improve the law.
This paper is divided into three parts, from the legislative background of the crime of refusing to pay remuneration of theoretical support, constitution and cognizance of the attempt to summarize from the shallower to the deeper, while collecting the views of others, to draw their own conclusions. In the first part, combing the legislative process of the crime, the crime into clear theoretical basis the crime. The second part of the crime to conduct a comprehensive analysis, the definition of the concept of fuzzy provisions. In the third part, further clarify the distinction between the crime and the crime based on the constitution of crime identification, and the establishment of the result aggravated crime, sentencing considerations.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國青年政治學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D924.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 黎建飛;拖欠民工工資中的法律問題[J];法學(xué)雜志;2004年02期

2 王鵬祥;;單位犯罪的立法缺陷及其完善[J];法學(xué)雜志;2009年05期

3 林木;卜建偉;;試論刑法的價值[J];法制與社會;2011年20期

4 趙川;;拒不支付勞動報酬罪數(shù)額認(rèn)定若干問題探究[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2012年12期

5 謝天長;;拒不支付勞動報酬罪的法律適用問題探討[J];北京人民警察學(xué)院學(xué)報;2011年06期

6 李光宇;;惡意欠薪罪研究[J];吉林公安高等專科學(xué)校學(xué)報;2011年02期

7 趙秉志;張偉珂;;拒不支付勞動報酬罪立法研究[J];南開學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2012年02期

8 周寶妹;郎俊義;;拒不支付勞動報酬罪的解讀——以勞動法為視角[J];人民司法;2012年11期

9 葛治華;文陽;;關(guān)于拒不支付勞動報酬罪的認(rèn)定[J];人民司法;2012年15期

10 張建;;拒不支付勞動報酬罪之我見[J];上海政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(法治論叢);2011年04期

本文編號：1606808