本文關(guān)鍵詞： 家政工權(quán)利 權(quán)利救濟(jì) 救濟(jì)程序　出處：《燕山大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：本文以家政工應(yīng)有的權(quán)利極其救濟(jì)程序的優(yōu)化設(shè)置為目的,在對(duì)國(guó)內(nèi)外研究現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行了深入分析的基礎(chǔ)上,對(duì)家政工的各項(xiàng)權(quán)利極其在各國(guó)的實(shí)現(xiàn)情況和家政工權(quán)利保障的救濟(jì)程序進(jìn)行了研究。 首先,從家政工的概念和分類開始,介紹了不同國(guó)家對(duì)家政工的理解和家政工的分類情況,在分析了家政工所包含的范圍和家政工的分類以及家政工目前的發(fā)展?fàn)顩r及其面臨的困境之后,重點(diǎn)分析了造成這種狀況的原因。 其次,在分析家政工發(fā)展所面臨的困境之后,論述了家政工應(yīng)當(dāng)享有的權(quán)利,包括聯(lián)合國(guó)《經(jīng)濟(jì)、社會(huì)、文化權(quán)利國(guó)際公約》、《世界人權(quán)宣言》和《公民權(quán)利與政治權(quán)利國(guó)際公約》中所規(guī)定的家政工作為勞動(dòng)者所應(yīng)當(dāng)享有的不被強(qiáng)迫或強(qiáng)制勞動(dòng)、合格的工作條件、集會(huì)和結(jié)社自由等各種權(quán)利以及家政工作為公民應(yīng)當(dāng)享有的禁止家庭暴力、遷徙自由、隱私保護(hù)和言論自由等不同權(quán)利。 在介紹完家政工應(yīng)當(dāng)享有的權(quán)利之后,重點(diǎn)介紹了家政工在美國(guó)法律中的地位,包括在聯(lián)邦層次上的《國(guó)家勞動(dòng)關(guān)系法》、《職業(yè)安全和醫(yī)療護(hù)理法》、《民權(quán)法》、《公平勞動(dòng)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)法》和不同州的法律對(duì)家政工權(quán)利保護(hù)的不同規(guī)定。另外。由于美國(guó)是英美法系國(guó)家,案例在其司法判決中具有重要意義,基于此本文還重點(diǎn)介紹了關(guān)于家政工司法判決的判例。在介紹完美國(guó)家政工的現(xiàn)狀之后,分析了其他國(guó)家關(guān)于家政工權(quán)利的保護(hù)情況。 最后,結(jié)合我國(guó)的具體情況,借鑒世界其他國(guó)家的先進(jìn)經(jīng)驗(yàn)和國(guó)際公約的規(guī)定,探討了我國(guó)家政工保護(hù)的具體方法和救濟(jì)程序的優(yōu)化設(shè)置。這部分分析了我國(guó)現(xiàn)行法律對(duì)于家政工的態(tài)度,在此基礎(chǔ)上提出了我國(guó)家政工權(quán)利的保護(hù)方式和實(shí)現(xiàn)方法。
[Abstract]:In order to optimize the domestic workers' rights and relief procedures, this paper makes a thorough analysis of the current research situation at home and abroad. This paper studies the rights of domestic workers and their realization in different countries and the remedy procedure of guaranteeing the rights of domestic workers. First of all, starting with the concept and classification of domestic workers, this paper introduces the understanding of domestic workers and the classification of domestic workers in different countries. After analyzing the scope of domestic workers and the classification of domestic workers as well as the current development situation of domestic workers and the difficulties they face, this paper focuses on the reasons for this situation. Secondly, after analyzing the difficulties faced by political workers, they discussed the rights that domestic workers should enjoy, including the United Nations [Economic, Social, Domestic work, as provided for in the International Covenant on Cultural Rights, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and political Rights, is a condition of work that is not subject to forced or compulsory labour and is eligible for work by workers, The rights to freedom of assembly and association and domestic work are different rights for citizens, such as the prohibition of domestic violence, freedom of movement, privacy protection and freedom of expression. After introducing the rights that domestic workers should enjoy, they focused on the status of domestic workers in United States law. Including the National Labor Relations Act at the federal level, the Occupational Safety and Medical Care Act, the Civil Rights Act, the Fair Labor Standards Act and the different provisions of the laws of different states on the protection of the rights of domestic workers. In addition, since the United States is a common law country, The case is of great significance in its judicial decision. Based on this, this paper also focuses on the case law of domestic workers. After introducing the current situation of political workers in perfect countries, this paper analyzes the protection of the rights of domestic workers in other countries. Finally, taking into account the specific conditions of our country and drawing on the advanced experience of other countries in the world and the provisions of international conventions, This part analyzes the attitude of our country's current law to domestic workers, and puts forward the way to protect and realize the rights of our country's political workers.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：燕山大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D922.5

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王竹青;吳道霞;;論家政工的勞動(dòng)權(quán)利[J];婦女研究論叢;2009年06期

2 常凱;勞權(quán)本位:勞動(dòng)法律體系構(gòu)建的基點(diǎn)和核心——兼論勞動(dòng)法律體系的幾個(gè)基本理論問題[J];工會(huì)理論與實(shí)踐.中國(guó)工運(yùn)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2001年06期

3 聶斌;;我國(guó)家政工保護(hù)的立法思考[J];甘肅行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年02期

4 張照東;;工傷案件賠償請(qǐng)求權(quán)競(jìng)合問題研究[J];河北法學(xué);2007年03期

5 顧培東;論我國(guó)民事權(quán)利司法保護(hù)的疏失[J];法學(xué)研究;2002年06期

6 劉峰;工傷認(rèn)定四論[J];中國(guó)勞動(dòng);2002年07期

7 陳碧賢;;工傷認(rèn)定之實(shí)質(zhì)性標(biāo)準(zhǔn)初探——兼論幾種特殊工傷的認(rèn)定[J];中國(guó)勞動(dòng);2006年08期

8 王全興,管斌;關(guān)于“過勞死”的法律思考[J];律師世界;2001年05期

9 高雅冰;;家政服務(wù)中介的若干法律兼實(shí)務(wù)問題探討[J];萊陽農(nóng)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年03期

10 李艷梅;;我國(guó)家政服務(wù)業(yè)的現(xiàn)狀分析與規(guī)范化建設(shè)[J];社會(huì)科學(xué)家;2008年07期

，

本文編號(hào)：1518605