【摘要】：公司的司法解散作為一種制度,其立法價值在于當公司股東之間發(fā)生糾紛,出現(xiàn)公司僵局時,在窮盡其他處理手段仍不能解決矛盾時,賦予少數(shù)股東請求司法機關(guān)介入以解散企業(yè),恢復(fù)各方權(quán)利,最終使股東的經(jīng)濟矛盾得以解決的可選擇的一種救濟方式。隨著經(jīng)濟的不斷發(fā)展,公司的數(shù)量也在不斷增長,股東之間的糾紛也很多,當公司股東之間發(fā)生糾紛,出現(xiàn)公司僵局時,在窮盡其他處理手段仍不能解決矛盾時,必然導(dǎo)致社會資源的浪費。公司司法解散是我國政府建立的市場經(jīng)濟法制要求完全一致,現(xiàn)代法制的要求是將一切經(jīng)濟活動納入法制軌道,用司法的方式作為經(jīng)濟的最高和最終的救濟模式,更體現(xiàn)出一種公平和公正。建立公司司法解散,對保護公司小股東的利益有著重大的作用。公司司法解散制度是一把雙刃劍,是最嚴厲的法律救濟途徑,因此適用時具有嚴格的限制條件,以防止股東對公司司法解散權(quán)利的濫用,公司司法解散從提出的主體,提出的情形,以及程序上都做出限制,必須窮盡其他一切辦法后方能適用公司解散。
[Abstract]:As a kind of system, the legislative value of the judicial dissolution of the company lies in the alternative relief way for the minority shareholders to request the judicial organ to intervene to dissolve the enterprise, restore the rights of all parties, and finally solve the economic contradiction of the shareholders when there are disputes between the shareholders and the deadlock of the company, and when the other means of dealing with the contradiction can not be resolved, the minority shareholders are given to request the judicial organ to intervene in order to dissolve the enterprise, restore the rights of all parties, and finally resolve the economic contradictions of the shareholders. With the continuous development of economy, the number of companies is also increasing, and there are many disputes between shareholders. When there are disputes between shareholders and corporate stalemate, when the contradiction can not be solved by other means, it will inevitably lead to the waste of social resources. The judicial dissolution of the company is completely consistent with the legal requirements of the market economy established by the government of our country. The requirement of the modern legal system is to bring all economic activities into the track of the legal system, and to use the judicial method as the highest and final relief mode of the economy, which reflects a kind of fairness and justice. The establishment of judicial dissolution of the company plays an important role in protecting the interests of minority shareholders of the company. The judicial dissolution system of the company is a double-edged sword and the most severe way of legal relief. Therefore, there are strict restrictions when applicable in order to prevent shareholders from abusing the right of judicial dissolution of the company. The judicial dissolution of the company is restricted from the proposed subject, the proposed situation, and the procedure. The dissolution of the company can only be applied after all other methods have been exhausted.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：東南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D922.291.91

【參考文獻】

中國期刊全文數(shù)據(jù)庫 前8條

1 劉毅;;司法解散公司訴訟之規(guī)則補遺與再論證 以最高法院關(guān)于適用《公司法》若干問題的規(guī)定(三)(征求意見稿)為視角[J];法律適用;2008年Z1期

2 何鳴;劉炳榮;;解散公司訴訟的幾點思考[J];人民司法;2007年03期

3 劉敏;;關(guān)于股東請求解散公司之訴若干問題的思考[J];法律適用;2006年10期

4 李曙光;;新《公司法》中破解“公司僵局”制度安排的探討[J];武漢理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2006年03期

5 梁上上;;公司僵局案的法律困境與路徑選擇——以新舊公司法對公司僵局的規(guī)范為中心展開[J];浙江社會科學(xué);2006年02期

6 鮑為民;美國法上的公司僵局處理制度及其啟示[J];法商研究;2005年03期

7 曾東紅,宋佑光;論有限責任公司僵局及其應(yīng)對[J];中山大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2004年03期

8 黃美園,周彥;我國公司僵局司法救濟制度之構(gòu)建[J];法律適用;2004年05期

中國重要報紙全文數(shù)據(jù)庫 前1條

1 趙旭東;;公司僵局的司法救濟[N];人民法院報;2002年

，

本文編號：2507929