我國國有企業(yè)納入GPA法律問題研究
[Abstract]:Since 2007, China has been applying to join the Government Procurement Agreement (the Government Procurement Agreement, (hereinafter referred to as "GPA"). However, up to now, China has not been able to join successfully, the most important point of debate is that the western developed countries want China to open up the procurement market of all state-owned enterprises, but our country believes that the procurement subject of the Government Procurement Law does not include state-owned enterprises. Moreover, the state-owned enterprises in China have carried out joint-stock reform, carried out the separation of government and enterprises, independent management, and do not belong to the functional departments of the government, so state-owned enterprises should not be included in the main body of government procurement. China's behavior of excluding state-owned enterprises from the main body of government procurement has made the western and other developed countries very dissatisfied, so the negotiation of China's accession to the GPA has not been successful and the accession process has been quite slow. On December 22, 2014, China submitted the sixth bid list of applications for accession to the GPA to the (WTO) of the World Trade Organization, which is very different from the past, especially the inclusion of three state-owned enterprises in Annex 3 for the first time. This means that China will open up the procurement market of state-owned enterprises. This paper analyzes the essential difference between the state-owned enterprises of our country and the state-owned enterprises of the western developed countries, so it is decided that our country should not open up the government procurement market of the state-owned enterprises as well as the western developed countries, but should establish its own open standard and choose part of the procurement market of the state-owned enterprises under this standard. This paper mainly uses the legal method of comparative analysis. The first part introduces the general situation of GPA, the concept and characteristics of state-owned enterprises in China and foreign countries, and compares the differences between state-owned enterprises at home and abroad, as well as the positive influence and realistic predicament of state-owned enterprises in China. The second part introduces the classification standards of foreign state-owned enterprises and the definition standards of "other entities" between GPA and agreement members, and then examines the confusion and lack of classification standards for state-owned enterprises in China. The third part introduces the classification of state-owned enterprises in China and the standards that should be applied to the inclusion of GPA. The last part is about the suggestions of perfecting the legal system of government procurement under the framework of GPA, including the bidding strategy of state-owned enterprises, the legal application of state-owned enterprises' procurement into GPA and the improvement of the relevant systems of government procurement in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:北京交通大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2015
【分類號】:D922.2
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 黃晶;從國有企業(yè)的性質(zhì)和功能來重新認識我國的國有企業(yè)改革[J];商業(yè)研究;2003年23期
2 譚雪梅;“國有企業(yè)”概念的重新界定[J];財經(jīng)問題研究;2002年07期
3 宋憲萍,范歆;國有企業(yè)的性質(zhì)[J];成人高教學(xué)刊;2005年05期
4 潘華實;日本國有企業(yè)管理體制及其啟示[J];當代亞太;1999年03期
5 劉紅光;中、美、日國有企業(yè)運行機制的市場化比較[J];東南學(xué)術(shù);2004年05期
6 黃速建;余菁;;國有企業(yè)的性質(zhì)、目標與社會責任[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟;2006年02期
7 屠新泉;;日本參與《政府采購協(xié)議》的經(jīng)驗與啟示[J];國際經(jīng)濟合作;2009年10期
8 賈根良;;我國為什么不要急于加入WTO政府采購協(xié)議[J];國外理論動態(tài);2012年02期
9 杜國用;;中國國有企業(yè)分類改革的理論與實踐[J];改革與戰(zhàn)略;2014年01期
10 程民選;王罡;;關(guān)于公益性國有企業(yè)的理論探討[J];當代經(jīng)濟研究;2014年03期
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 張?zhí)燠?GPA框架下的我國地方政府采購制度研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2011年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條
1 邢婷婷;中國國有企業(yè)納入GPA問題研究[D];廈門大學(xué);2014年
2 鄭予凡;中日政府采購法律制度比較研究[D];北京外國語大學(xué);2014年
3 宋佳;論我國政府采購法律制度的完善[D];四川師范大學(xué);2014年
,本文編號:2506840
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/jingjifalunwen/2506840.html