天堂国产午夜亚洲专区-少妇人妻综合久久蜜臀-国产成人户外露出视频在线-国产91传媒一区二区三区

我國國有企業(yè)納入GPA法律問題研究

發(fā)布時間:2019-06-27 13:42
【摘要】:我國從2007年起就開始申請加入《政府采購協(xié)議》(the Government Procurement Agreement,以下簡稱為“GPA”),但是至今我國仍然沒有能夠成功加入,這其中最主要爭議點就在于西方發(fā)達國家希望我國開放全部國有企業(yè)采購市場,而我國認為我國《政府采購法》的采購主體中并不包含國有企業(yè),況且我國國有企業(yè)進行了股份制改革,實行政企分開、自主經(jīng)營,也不屬于政府的職能部門,所以國有企業(yè)不應(yīng)該納入政府采購主體。我國將國有企業(yè)排除政府采購主體的行為令西方等發(fā)達國家非常不滿,因此我國數(shù)次加入GPA的談判都未能成功且加入進程相當緩慢。2014年12月22日,我國向世界貿(mào)易組織(WTO)提交了申請加入GPA的第六份出價清單,這份出價清單較之以往有很大不同,尤其是在附件3中首次列入了3家國有企業(yè),這意味著我國即將開放國有企業(yè)采購市場。本文分析了我國國有企業(yè)與西方發(fā)達國家國有企業(yè)的本質(zhì)差別,所以決定了我國不能像西方發(fā)達國家那樣全部開放其國有企業(yè)政府采購市場,而應(yīng)該建立自己的開放標準,并在這一標準下有選擇的部分開放國有企業(yè)采購市場。 本文主要運用了比較分析的法學(xué)方法,第一部分首先介紹了GPA的概況、我國國有企與國外國有企業(yè)的概念與特點并對比國內(nèi)外國有企業(yè)的不同,以及分析了我國國有企業(yè)納入GPA的積極影響以及現(xiàn)實的困境。第二部分介紹了國外國有企業(yè)的分類標準以及GPA與協(xié)議成員國對于“其他實體”的界定標準,進而審視我國對于國有企業(yè)分類標準的混亂與缺失。第三部分介紹了我國國有企業(yè)的分類以及納入GPA應(yīng)當適用的標準。最后一部分講述的是我國國有企業(yè)納入GPA框架下我國政府采購法律制度的完善建議,包括我國國有企業(yè)的出價策略、納入GPA的國有企業(yè)采購的法律適用以及我國政府采購相關(guān)制度的完善。
[Abstract]:Since 2007, China has been applying to join the Government Procurement Agreement (the Government Procurement Agreement, (hereinafter referred to as "GPA"). However, up to now, China has not been able to join successfully, the most important point of debate is that the western developed countries want China to open up the procurement market of all state-owned enterprises, but our country believes that the procurement subject of the Government Procurement Law does not include state-owned enterprises. Moreover, the state-owned enterprises in China have carried out joint-stock reform, carried out the separation of government and enterprises, independent management, and do not belong to the functional departments of the government, so state-owned enterprises should not be included in the main body of government procurement. China's behavior of excluding state-owned enterprises from the main body of government procurement has made the western and other developed countries very dissatisfied, so the negotiation of China's accession to the GPA has not been successful and the accession process has been quite slow. On December 22, 2014, China submitted the sixth bid list of applications for accession to the GPA to the (WTO) of the World Trade Organization, which is very different from the past, especially the inclusion of three state-owned enterprises in Annex 3 for the first time. This means that China will open up the procurement market of state-owned enterprises. This paper analyzes the essential difference between the state-owned enterprises of our country and the state-owned enterprises of the western developed countries, so it is decided that our country should not open up the government procurement market of the state-owned enterprises as well as the western developed countries, but should establish its own open standard and choose part of the procurement market of the state-owned enterprises under this standard. This paper mainly uses the legal method of comparative analysis. The first part introduces the general situation of GPA, the concept and characteristics of state-owned enterprises in China and foreign countries, and compares the differences between state-owned enterprises at home and abroad, as well as the positive influence and realistic predicament of state-owned enterprises in China. The second part introduces the classification standards of foreign state-owned enterprises and the definition standards of "other entities" between GPA and agreement members, and then examines the confusion and lack of classification standards for state-owned enterprises in China. The third part introduces the classification of state-owned enterprises in China and the standards that should be applied to the inclusion of GPA. The last part is about the suggestions of perfecting the legal system of government procurement under the framework of GPA, including the bidding strategy of state-owned enterprises, the legal application of state-owned enterprises' procurement into GPA and the improvement of the relevant systems of government procurement in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:北京交通大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2015
【分類號】:D922.2

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 黃晶;從國有企業(yè)的性質(zhì)和功能來重新認識我國的國有企業(yè)改革[J];商業(yè)研究;2003年23期

2 譚雪梅;“國有企業(yè)”概念的重新界定[J];財經(jīng)問題研究;2002年07期

3 宋憲萍,范歆;國有企業(yè)的性質(zhì)[J];成人高教學(xué)刊;2005年05期

4 潘華實;日本國有企業(yè)管理體制及其啟示[J];當代亞太;1999年03期

5 劉紅光;中、美、日國有企業(yè)運行機制的市場化比較[J];東南學(xué)術(shù);2004年05期

6 黃速建;余菁;;國有企業(yè)的性質(zhì)、目標與社會責任[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟;2006年02期

7 屠新泉;;日本參與《政府采購協(xié)議》的經(jīng)驗與啟示[J];國際經(jīng)濟合作;2009年10期

8 賈根良;;我國為什么不要急于加入WTO政府采購協(xié)議[J];國外理論動態(tài);2012年02期

9 杜國用;;中國國有企業(yè)分類改革的理論與實踐[J];改革與戰(zhàn)略;2014年01期

10 程民選;王罡;;關(guān)于公益性國有企業(yè)的理論探討[J];當代經(jīng)濟研究;2014年03期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 張?zhí)燠?GPA框架下的我國地方政府采購制度研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2011年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 邢婷婷;中國國有企業(yè)納入GPA問題研究[D];廈門大學(xué);2014年

2 鄭予凡;中日政府采購法律制度比較研究[D];北京外國語大學(xué);2014年

3 宋佳;論我國政府采購法律制度的完善[D];四川師范大學(xué);2014年

,

本文編號:2506840

資料下載
論文發(fā)表

本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/jingjifalunwen/2506840.html


Copyright(c)文論論文網(wǎng)All Rights Reserved | 網(wǎng)站地圖 |

版權(quán)申明:資料由用戶fc28a***提供,本站僅收錄摘要或目錄,作者需要刪除請E-mail郵箱bigeng88@qq.com