【摘要】：先訴民間借貸,在未被法院支持的情況下轉(zhuǎn)而訴不當(dāng)?shù)美钱?dāng)下民事訴訟中一個(gè)值得關(guān)注的問題。當(dāng)事人將民間借貸和不當(dāng)?shù)美鳛閮煞N訴訟策略在方法上是可行的,也并不構(gòu)成濫用訴訟權(quán)利。在當(dāng)事人訴不當(dāng)?shù)美那闆r下,舉證責(zé)任的分配不應(yīng)完全按照規(guī)范說(shuō),而應(yīng)當(dāng)進(jìn)行適當(dāng)修正,以保證當(dāng)事人雙方實(shí)質(zhì)的平等與公正。
[Abstract]:It is a problem worth paying attention to in the current civil litigation to sue for improper enrichment without the support of the court. It is feasible for the parties to regard private lending and unjust enrichment as two litigation strategies, and it does not constitute an abuse of litigation rights. In the case of the parties v. unjust enrichment, the distribution of the burden of proof should not be in full accordance with the norms, but should be properly amended to ensure the substantive equality and justice of both parties.
【作者單位】： 中國(guó)政法大學(xué);
【基金】：中國(guó)政法大學(xué)研究生院“研究生創(chuàng)新實(shí)踐項(xiàng)目”的資助,項(xiàng)目號(hào):2015SSCX016
【分類號(hào)】：D922.282

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 劉鐵軍;;論票據(jù)之不當(dāng)?shù)美颠�[J];法學(xué)雜志;2010年12期

2 黃軍;李琛;;損失填補(bǔ)原則探微[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2006年02期

3 ;[J];;年期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 田彬;淺析ATM機(jī)非正常交易的法律責(zé)任[N];金融時(shí)報(bào);2005年

，

本文編號(hào)：2482693