虛假陳述侵權(quán)責(zé)任之侵權(quán)行為認定
發(fā)布時間：2019-05-21 21:44
【摘要】：虛假陳述行為不僅干擾經(jīng)濟秩序,而且損害了廣大投資者的合法利益。在虛假陳述行為的認定上,應(yīng)采納分層、分點的認定方法。首先在統(tǒng)合性標準方面,即虛假陳述行為的幾個共性要件上,應(yīng)將"理性投資者"理論作為重大性的判斷標準,并借鑒"有效市場"理論作為公開性之認定標準。其次在類型化標準方面,根據(jù)虛假陳述行為的具體類型規(guī)定相應(yīng)的認定標準。如虛假記載,強調(diào)的是真實性標準和合理性標準;誤導(dǎo)性陳述,針對的是準確性標準;重大遺漏,則針對完整性標準;不正當披露,強調(diào)及時性和法定形式性要求。此外,場外資本市場的虛假陳述行為認定應(yīng)與場內(nèi)市場保持一致,無需特別規(guī)定,予以區(qū)別對待。
[Abstract]:False statements not only interfere with the economic order, but also harm the legitimate interests of the majority of investors. In the identification of false statement behavior, we should adopt the method of layering and dividing points. First of all, in the aspect of integration standard, that is, several common elements of false statement behavior, we should take the theory of "rational investor" as the criterion of importance, and draw lessons from the theory of "efficient market" as the standard of cognizance of openness. Secondly, in the aspect of typing standard, the corresponding identification standard is stipulated according to the specific type of false statement behavior. If the false record emphasizes the authenticity standard and the rationality standard; the misleading statement aims at the accuracy standard; the material omission aims at the completeness standard; the improper disclosure emphasizes the timeliness and the legal formality requirement. In addition, the identification of false statements in the over-the-counter capital market should be consistent with the in-field market and should be treated differently without special provisions.
【作者單位】： 中南財經(jīng)政法大學(xué)民商法典研究所;
【分類號】：D922.287
本文編號：2482423
[Abstract]:False statements not only interfere with the economic order, but also harm the legitimate interests of the majority of investors. In the identification of false statement behavior, we should adopt the method of layering and dividing points. First of all, in the aspect of integration standard, that is, several common elements of false statement behavior, we should take the theory of "rational investor" as the criterion of importance, and draw lessons from the theory of "efficient market" as the standard of cognizance of openness. Secondly, in the aspect of typing standard, the corresponding identification standard is stipulated according to the specific type of false statement behavior. If the false record emphasizes the authenticity standard and the rationality standard; the misleading statement aims at the accuracy standard; the material omission aims at the completeness standard; the improper disclosure emphasizes the timeliness and the legal formality requirement. In addition, the identification of false statements in the over-the-counter capital market should be consistent with the in-field market and should be treated differently without special provisions.
【作者單位】： 中南財經(jīng)政法大學(xué)民商法典研究所;
【分類號】：D922.287
【相似文獻】
相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前10條
1 趙彤剛;做個理性投資者[N];中國證券報;2007年
2 劉佳章 編輯 李導(dǎo);2010年將是理性投資者的天下[N];上海證券報;2010年
3 證券時報記者 甘霖;廣東證監(jiān)局：著力培育理性投資者[N];證券時報;2012年
4 李國旺;套期保值的局限[N];上海證券報;2006年
5 周科競;理性投資者可布局封基[N];北京商報;2011年
6 謝潞錦;回歸理性投資者對新基金“挑三揀四”[N];第一財經(jīng)日報;2007年
7 許諾;我國期貨市場走向成熟[N];期貨日報;2003年
8 李大霄;火熱市場下的冷靜思考[N];證券時報;2006年
9 證券時報記者 程丹;向網(wǎng)下理性投資者傾斜 促新股合理定價[N];證券時報;2014年
10 宋海蛟;股市需要理性投資者[N];金融時報;2007年
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 李進芳;帶信息的情緒資產(chǎn)定價研究[D];華南理工大學(xué);2014年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 張曉敏;社會結(jié)構(gòu)轉(zhuǎn)型中的股民群體[D];山東大學(xué);2009年
，本文編號：2482423
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/jingjifalunwen/2482423.html
