【摘要】：我國傳統(tǒng)的融資市場主要以銀行機構(gòu)為主,一方面為了保證資金的安全性,銀行機構(gòu)對外借貸一般會設(shè)置很高的融資標準,這些比較高的貸款發(fā)放標準導(dǎo)致的結(jié)果是大型企業(yè)可以不費絲毫之力就可以獲得銀行的貸款,但是對中小企業(yè)和個人來說由于自身的條件達不到銀行的放貸標準只能望而卻步;另一方面,銀行需要花費大量的時間、人力、物力、財力在調(diào)查清楚中小企業(yè)的資金狀況和還款能力之后才決定是否放貸。但大型企業(yè)因為其社會影響大、資金雄厚、經(jīng)營規(guī)模等,銀行在放貸時不需要這么大動干戈。銀行嚴格的放貸標準與中小企業(yè)和個人對資金的需求導(dǎo)致了民間借貸的日益繁榮。傳統(tǒng)的民間借貸借助迅猛發(fā)展的互聯(lián)網(wǎng)技術(shù)開辟了新的借貸平臺一網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸平臺,p2p網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸由此誕生。我國的p2p網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸平臺屬于舶來品,在發(fā)展中出現(xiàn)與我國實際情況不相符等一系列問題:網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸的立法不完善;p2p網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸的三方主體的權(quán)利義務(wù)規(guī)定不明確;對借貸雙方的保護機制不健全;準入與退出機制不完善;缺乏個人征信體系和信息披露制度;對p2p網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸的監(jiān)管不完善。導(dǎo)致p2p平臺出現(xiàn)跑路、提現(xiàn)困難、詐騙,在交易中損害貸款人的利益,損害借款人的信息權(quán)益,甚至引發(fā)刑事犯罪等問題層出不窮。本文針對特定的問題提出了完善建議,包括專門立法;完善互聯(lián)網(wǎng)方面的法律;明確借貸雙方的權(quán)利義務(wù);制定準入與退出機制;加強信息披露和監(jiān)管;建立個人征信體系。P2p借貸審時度勢的利用了互聯(lián)網(wǎng)技術(shù),解決了中小企業(yè)和個人對資金的需求,實現(xiàn)了金融創(chuàng)新。從大處而言,p2p互聯(lián)網(wǎng)借貸在經(jīng)濟上是實現(xiàn)普惠金融的主要途徑之一,在政治上能夠?qū)崿F(xiàn)金融民主,其社會價值不容小覷。因此,p2p網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸具有很高的研究價值。
[Abstract]:The traditional financing market in China is dominated by banking institutions. On the one hand, in order to ensure the safety of funds, banks generally set very high financing standards for external lending. The result of these higher lending standards is that large enterprises can obtain bank loans without any effort, but for small and medium-sized enterprises and individuals because of their own conditions can not meet the bank lending standards can only be deterred; On the other hand, banks need to spend a lot of time, manpower, material and financial resources to determine whether to lend after investigating the financial situation and repayment capacity of small and medium-sized enterprises. But because of its large social impact, strong capital, operating scale, banks do not need to lend so much. Strict lending standards by banks and demand for funds by small and medium-sized enterprises and individuals have led to a growing boom in private lending. The traditional folk lending opened up a new lending platform-network lending platform with the help of the rapid development of Internet technology, and P2P network lending was born. The P2P network lending platform of our country is an imported product, and has appeared a series of problems in the development, such as: the legislation of the network lending is not perfect, the rights and obligations of the three parties of the P2P network lending are unclear, and the development of the P2P network lending platform is not consistent with the actual situation of our country. The protection mechanism for both parties is not perfect; the admission and withdrawal mechanism is not perfect; the personal credit collection system and information disclosure system are lacking; the supervision of P2P network lending is not perfect. Such problems as running away from P2P platform, difficulty in withdrawing cash, fraud, damaging the interests of lenders and information rights and interests of borrowers, and even causing criminal offences emerge one after another in the course of the transaction, which causes the P2P platform to run away, withdraw cash difficult and defraud. This paper puts forward some suggestions for specific problems, including special legislation, improving the law of Internet, clarifying the rights and obligations of both lenders and borrowers, establishing the mechanism of admission and withdrawal, strengthening information disclosure and supervision, and making clear the rights and obligations of both lenders and borrowers. In order to solve the demand for funds of small and medium-sized enterprises and individuals, P2p has realized financial innovation by making use of the Internet technology in order to establish a personal credit collection system. Generally speaking, P2P Internet lending is one of the main ways to realize inclusive finance in economy. It can realize financial democracy in politics, and its social value can not be underestimated. Therefore, P2P network lending has high research value.
【學位授予單位】：寧夏大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D922.282

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 沐玲;;我國P2P網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸主體行為之刑法評價[J];稅務(wù)與經(jīng)濟;2016年06期

2 羅雪梅;;新《民間借貸司法解釋》下的P2P網(wǎng)貸平臺解析[J];法制與社會;2016年13期

3 申暢;;P2P網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸平臺的運營模式及刑事法律問題探析[J];新疆警察學院學報;2016年02期

4 高宇凡;;我國P2P網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸的法律監(jiān)管研究[J];法制博覽;2016年10期

5 孫小華;;P2P網(wǎng)絡(luò)信貸下債權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓模式的合法性探討[J];法制與社會;2016年08期

6 侯卓;苗露強;;我國P2P網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸課稅問題研究[J];稅務(wù)與經(jīng)濟;2016年01期

7 唐心韻;;我國P2P網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸平臺監(jiān)管法律問題研究[J];長沙民政職業(yè)技術(shù)學院學報;2015年04期

8 何文妍;;我國P2P網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸平臺法律性質(zhì)分類探析[J];蘭州教育學院學報;2015年10期

9 林蔚;;完善P2P網(wǎng)貸平臺風險防范的法律思考[J];華南師范大學學報(社會科學版);2015年03期

10 曲斯鳴;;完善我國P2P網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸法律監(jiān)管的路徑[J];經(jīng)濟論壇;2015年04期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前4條

1 郭奎濤;;P2P網(wǎng)貸平臺七八成將出局[N];中國企業(yè)報;2014年

2 閆瑾;;地方版P2P網(wǎng)貸監(jiān)管雛形首現(xiàn)[N];北京商報;2014年

3 李研;;三P2P網(wǎng)站同日被“黑” 偵查量刑兩大盲點[N];21世紀經(jīng)濟報道;2014年

4 龍昊;;P2P小額信貸模式亟需法律規(guī)范[N];中國經(jīng)濟時報;2011年

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前10條

1 李璽;我國P2P網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸的法律監(jiān)管研究[D];山東大學;2016年

2 何聰聰;我國P2P網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸運營模式及風險研究[D];西南民族大學;2016年

3 丁春燕;P2P網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸的刑法規(guī)制問題研究[D];華東政法大學;2016年

4 李仁杰;P2P網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸行業(yè)的法律監(jiān)管問題研究[D];杭州師范大學;2016年

5 方昕;我國互聯(lián)網(wǎng)金融的政府監(jiān)管問題研究[D];南京師范大學;2015年

6 李陽月;P2P網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸與小額貸款公司的合作研究[D];云南財經(jīng)大學;2015年

7 程佳;我國P2P網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸平臺的法律性質(zhì)與監(jiān)管路徑探析[D];湖南大學;2015年

8 俞燕霞;P2P網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸平臺刑事法律問題探析[D];華東政法大學;2015年

9 劉學婷;基于互聯(lián)網(wǎng)平臺的P2P網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸模式研究[D];天津商業(yè)大學;2014年

10 王旭;我國P2P網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸規(guī)范發(fā)展研究[D];天津師范大學;2014年

，

本文編號：2452558