【摘要】：我國碳市場具備了金融化的發(fā)展特征,但現(xiàn)有制度并未對碳市場金融化作出具體安排,這使得碳市場交易產(chǎn)品、交易行為和交易主體存在監(jiān)管上的合法性疑問,其中金融交易風(fēng)險亦無法得到有效防范。為了防范碳市場金融風(fēng)險的發(fā)生,強化市場誠信和信心,歐盟明確對碳市場的金融監(jiān)管,其在歐美碳市場金融監(jiān)管中具有典型性。歐盟碳市場在普遍適用金融監(jiān)管規(guī)則的前提下,采用可適用規(guī)則、主體和行為區(qū)別對待的理念,對碳市場交易適用金融規(guī)則作出例外性規(guī)定。本文基于我國碳市場現(xiàn)實基礎(chǔ)和法治建設(shè)需求,分析了我國與歐盟碳市場監(jiān)管的異同,吸收了一定的可取之處,為解決我國碳市場金融監(jiān)管的問題,提出在現(xiàn)有碳市場專門規(guī)范中需對碳交易產(chǎn)品、交易方式和交易主體等的金融屬性和監(jiān)管條件進行識別,并在已有監(jiān)管體系下,協(xié)調(diào)與細化碳市場規(guī)范與金融法規(guī)之間的關(guān)系。
[Abstract]:China's carbon market has the development characteristics of financialization, but the existing system has not made specific arrangements for the financialization of carbon market, which makes the carbon market trading products, trading behavior and trading subjects in question of regulatory legitimacy. Among them, financial transaction risk can not be effectively prevented. In order to prevent the occurrence of financial risks in the carbon market and strengthen the integrity and confidence of the market, the European Union clearly regulates the financial supervision of the carbon market, which is typical in the financial supervision of the carbon market in Europe and the United States. Under the premise of the universal application of financial supervision rules, the EU carbon market adopts the concept of applicable rules, subject and behavior to make exceptions to the application of financial rules to carbon market transactions. Based on the realistic foundation of China's carbon market and the needs of legal construction, this paper analyzes the similarities and differences between China and the European Union in terms of the regulation of the carbon market, and absorbs some merits, in order to solve the problem of financial supervision in China's carbon market. It is proposed that the financial attributes and regulatory conditions of carbon trading products, trading methods and trading subjects should be identified in the existing special specifications of the carbon market, and the relationship between carbon market norms and financial regulations should be coordinated and refined under the existing regulatory system.
【作者單位】： 上海財經(jīng)大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【基金】：上海財經(jīng)大學(xué)研究生創(chuàng)新基金資助項目“綠色債券法律機制研究”(CXJJ-2014-394)的階段性成果
【分類號】：D922.28
，

本文編號：2330896