【摘要】：目前,我國的PPP模式因得到了政府的高度重視而逐漸興起,但有關(guān)PPP模式的法律制定卻步履蹣跚,將可能導(dǎo)致未來產(chǎn)生一系列問題或糾紛無法可依。本文結(jié)合PPP模式自身的特點,提出在我國PPP項目的交易中,政府不但需要作為平等主體的一方履行合同約定的義務(wù),還需要采取有效的監(jiān)管措施對整個PPP項目實施的過程予以監(jiān)管,由此探討了將我國PPP模式監(jiān)管置于法律規(guī)范下的重要性。同時,本文比較研究了PPP模式在發(fā)達國家和我國的立法現(xiàn)狀,結(jié)合發(fā)達國家建立PPP模式監(jiān)管法律體系的先進經(jīng)驗,借鑒可以運用于我國法律制度設(shè)計的部分,試圖提出幾點完善建議,從而將PPP模式的監(jiān)管制度置于我國現(xiàn)行法律體系之下。論文主要分為四個部分:第一部分是PPP模式監(jiān)管的概述。首先,從PPP模式包含的要素來分析PPP模式監(jiān)管的含義;其次,從PPP市場交易的局限性、政府雙重角色的沖突性、PPP模式具有特殊性這三點來分析PPP模式監(jiān)管的必要性。第二部分主要分析我國PPP模式監(jiān)管存在的問題。監(jiān)管法律依據(jù)效力層級低和法律內(nèi)容簡單粗糙導(dǎo)致PPP模式監(jiān)管的法律依據(jù)存在不足;在監(jiān)管主體方面,目前PPP模式在我國處于混亂的狀態(tài)中,沒有獨立的第三方監(jiān)管機構(gòu),多部門共同監(jiān)管導(dǎo)致監(jiān)管混亂,各行政主體監(jiān)管權(quán)力分散;在監(jiān)管內(nèi)容方面,存在監(jiān)管標(biāo)準(zhǔn)不統(tǒng)一、社會資本的準(zhǔn)入與退出規(guī)則不明確等問題;在監(jiān)管責(zé)任承擔(dān)機制方面,缺乏監(jiān)管效果評價機制、監(jiān)管責(zé)任追究機制不完善。第三部分介紹了國外PPP模式監(jiān)管的立法例及對我國的借鑒意義。通過對英國相對獨立的三級機構(gòu)監(jiān)管模式、美國PPP分級獨立監(jiān)管模式、德國PPP“公共交互網(wǎng)絡(luò)”模式的介紹,總結(jié)出國外PPP模式監(jiān)管對我國的借鑒意義。第四部分提出了完善我國PPP模式監(jiān)管的建議。針對我國PPP模式監(jiān)管出現(xiàn)的問題和不足,在吸收他國法律制度優(yōu)秀之處的基礎(chǔ)上,提出了以下建議:在監(jiān)管機構(gòu)方面,建立獨立于PPP項目各參與方的監(jiān)管機構(gòu),建立中央及地方兩級獨立監(jiān)管機構(gòu);在監(jiān)管內(nèi)容方面,制定統(tǒng)一的監(jiān)管標(biāo)準(zhǔn),明確社會資本準(zhǔn)入及退出規(guī)則;在監(jiān)管責(zé)任承擔(dān)機制方面,建立監(jiān)管效果評價機制,發(fā)揮行政責(zé)任追究機制的作用。
[Abstract]:At present, the PPP model of our country is rising gradually because it has been attached great importance to by the government, but the law making of the PPP model is faltering, which may lead to a series of problems or disputes that can not be followed in the future. According to the characteristics of PPP model, this paper points out that in the transaction of PPP projects in China, the government should not only fulfill the contractual obligations as one of the equal subjects. It is also necessary to take effective supervision measures to supervise the process of implementing the whole PPP project. Therefore, the importance of putting the supervision of China's PPP mode under the legal norms is discussed. At the same time, this paper compares and studies the legislation status of PPP model in developed countries and our country, combines the advanced experience of establishing PPP model supervision legal system in developed countries, and draws lessons from the part that can be applied to the design of legal system of our country. This paper tries to put forward several suggestions to put the supervision system of PPP model under the current legal system of our country. The thesis is divided into four parts: the first part is the overview of PPP mode supervision. Firstly, the meaning of PPP mode regulation is analyzed from the elements contained in PPP mode; secondly, the necessity of PPP mode regulation is analyzed from three aspects: the limitation of PPP market transaction, the conflict of government's dual role and the particularity of PPP mode. The second part mainly analyzes the existing problems of PPP mode supervision in China. The low level of the legal basis of supervision and the crude content of the law lead to the insufficiency of the legal basis of the supervision of PPP mode; In the aspect of supervision subject, PPP mode is in chaos in our country at present, there is no independent third party supervision organization, multi-department joint supervision leads to supervision confusion, and the supervision power of each administrative body is dispersed. In the content of supervision, there are some problems, such as inconsistent supervision standards, unclear rules of admission and withdrawal of social capital, and lack of supervision effect evaluation mechanism and imperfect mechanism of investigation of supervision responsibility. The third part introduces the legislative examples of foreign PPP mode supervision and its reference significance to our country. Based on the introduction of the relative independent three-level regulatory model in Britain, the hierarchical independent supervision model of PPP in the United States and the "public interactive network" model of PPP in Germany, this paper summarizes the significance of the supervision of foreign PPP mode to our country. The fourth part puts forward the suggestion of perfecting PPP mode supervision in our country. In view of the problems and shortcomings of PPP mode supervision in China, on the basis of absorbing the excellence of other countries' legal systems, this paper puts forward the following suggestions: in the aspect of regulatory agencies, we should establish a regulatory body independent of the participants in PPP projects. The establishment of independent regulatory bodies at the central and local levels; In the aspect of supervision content, we should establish a unified supervision standard, make clear the rules of social capital entry and withdrawal, and establish a supervision effect evaluation mechanism to play the role of administrative responsibility investigation mechanism in the aspect of supervision responsibility assumption mechanism.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D922.29

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 徐琳;;法國公私合作(PPP模式)法律問題研究[J];行政法學(xué)研究;2016年03期

2 郭培義;龍鳳嬌;;PPP模式推進過程中的問題及建議[J];建筑經(jīng)濟;2015年08期

3 和軍;戴錦;;公私合作伙伴關(guān)系(PPP)研究的新進展[J];福建論壇(人文社會科學(xué)版);2015年05期

4 高穎;張水波;馮卓;;PPP項目運營期間需求量下降情形下的補償機制研究[J];管理工程學(xué)報;2015年02期

5 張曉敏;陳通;;公共文化設(shè)施PPP建設(shè)運營模式研究[J];管理現(xiàn)代化;2015年01期

6 陳婉玲;;公私合作制的源流、價值與政府責(zé)任[J];上海財經(jīng)大學(xué)學(xué)報;2014年05期

7 中國財政學(xué)會公私合作(PPP) 研究專業(yè)委員會課題組;賈康;孫潔;;英國開展公私合作伙伴關(guān)系的經(jīng)驗及借鑒[J];經(jīng)濟研究參考;2014年13期

8 賈康;孫潔;;公私合作伙伴機制:新型城鎮(zhèn)化投融資的模式創(chuàng)新[J];中共中央黨校學(xué)報;2014年01期

9 張水波;張晨;高穎;;公私合營(PPP)項目的規(guī)制研究[J];天津大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2014年01期

10 梁時娟;張子龍;王守清;;中、英、日、韓PPP項目模式的政府管理比較研究[J];項目管理技術(shù);2013年05期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 雷麗娜;我國城市公用事業(yè)市場化改革中的政府規(guī)制研究[D];湖南大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號：2305329