【摘要】：本文的研究的主要目的在于通過問卷調(diào)查比較不同國家的市場誠信水平,以及通過計量實(shí)證來分析消費(fèi)者保護(hù)制度對市場誠信是否存在促進(jìn)作用,來對我國的市場誠信建設(shè)提出建議。研究發(fā)現(xiàn),發(fā)達(dá)國家的市場誠信水平平均要明顯高于發(fā)展中國家。發(fā)達(dá)國家中瑞典和新西蘭最高,加拿大、美國、德國和日本其次,而俄羅斯、英國、法國、西班牙和韓國最低;發(fā)展中國家中,歐洲發(fā)展中國家的平均市場誠信水平最高,非洲發(fā)展中國家和亞洲發(fā)展中國家基本持平。相對于總體來說,我國的市場誠信水處于比較低的水平,這說明我國的誠信缺失比較嚴(yán)重,亟需改善。通過實(shí)證分析,無理由退貨制度、懲罰性賠償制度和消費(fèi)者教育制度對市場誠信起到了顯著的正向作用,而無理由退貨制度對市場誠信的影響最大。因此,筆者建議我國完善無理由退貨制度,懲罰性賠償制度和消費(fèi)者教育制度,提高消費(fèi)者弱勢地位,降低經(jīng)營者短期機(jī)會主義行為動機(jī),促進(jìn)合同執(zhí)行力,從而提高市場誠信水平。除此之外,提高市場經(jīng)濟(jì)完善程度,產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)、教育水平和人均收入來促進(jìn)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展和經(jīng)濟(jì)福利。
[Abstract]:The main purpose of this paper is to compare the level of market integrity in different countries by questionnaire, and to analyze whether consumer protection system can promote market integrity through econometric evidence. In order to our country's market integrity construction puts forward the proposal. The study found that the average level of market integrity in developed countries is significantly higher than that in developing countries. Among the developed countries, Sweden and New Zealand are the highest, Canada, the United States, Germany and Japan are second, while Russia, the United Kingdom, France, Spain and South Korea are the lowest. Among the developing countries, the developing countries in Europe have the highest average level of market integrity. Developing countries in Africa and developing countries in Asia are basically the same. Compared with the general situation, the market integrity water in our country is at a relatively low level, which indicates that the lack of honesty in our country is serious and needs to be improved. Through the empirical analysis, the unjustified return system, punitive damages system and consumer education system have played a significant positive role in market integrity, while the unjustified return system has the greatest impact on market integrity. Therefore, the author suggests that our country should perfect the unjustified return system, punitive damages system and consumer education system, improve the weak position of consumers, reduce the motivation of short-term opportunistic behavior of managers, and promote the execution of contracts. In order to improve the integrity of the market level. In addition, improve the market economy, property rights protection, education and per capita income to promote economic development and economic welfare.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D923.8;F203

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 廖麗;;中國消費(fèi)者權(quán)利保護(hù)現(xiàn)狀研究——以聯(lián)合國《保護(hù)消費(fèi)者準(zhǔn)則》為基準(zhǔn)[J];宏觀質(zhì)量研究;2013年01期

2 文建東;;誠信、信任與經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué):國內(nèi)外研究評述[J];福建論壇(人文社會科學(xué)版);2007年10期

3 謝海;;中國消費(fèi)者保護(hù)制度缺陷的經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)分析[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)體制改革;2006年06期

4 廖小平;;論誠信與制度[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2006年06期

5 劉益燈;中國消費(fèi)者保護(hù)的立法缺陷及其完善[J];湖南大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2003年01期

6 張維迎,柯榮住;信任及其解釋:來自中國的跨省調(diào)查分析[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2002年10期

7 楊瑞龍;關(guān)于誠信的制度經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)思考[J];中國人民大學(xué)學(xué)報;2002年05期

8 張維迎,柯榮住;訴訟過程中的逆向選擇及其解釋——以契約糾紛的基層法院判決書為例的經(jīng)驗(yàn)研究[J];中國社會科學(xué);2002年02期

9 張維迎;法律制度的信譽(yù)基礎(chǔ)[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2002年01期

，

本文編號：2283771