【摘要】：價格壟斷行為破壞市場競爭機制，損害消費者和社會公共利益。依法開展反價格壟斷執(zhí)法工作，對預防和制止價格壟斷行為，保護公平競爭發(fā)揮重要作用，是完善社會主義市場經(jīng)濟體制的內在需要。本文圍繞當前我國反價格壟斷執(zhí)法經(jīng)驗尚處于起步階段，反價格壟斷工作面臨諸多挑戰(zhàn)，從如何借鑒歐盟執(zhí)法經(jīng)驗、分析我國反價格壟斷執(zhí)法難點，探索可行對策等方面，提高反價格壟斷執(zhí)法能力和水平。本文結構如下： 緒論部分通過研究背景、研究意義，闡述論文選題的出發(fā)點，在國內外研究現(xiàn)狀、論文結構、研究方法與思路等章節(jié)，對論文的寫作思路做了整理和規(guī)范。 論文主體通過分析我國反價格壟斷執(zhí)法存在的問題、存在問題的原因以及借鑒歐盟反價格壟斷法律制度和執(zhí)法對我國的啟示，提出完善我國反價格壟斷執(zhí)法的對策。此部分共分為四章。具體內容如下： 一、我國反價格壟斷執(zhí)法存在的問題。分析反價格壟斷執(zhí)法存在的問題是研究基礎。主要從市場監(jiān)管經(jīng)驗不足、缺乏系統(tǒng)完整的反價格壟斷體系、對行政壟斷規(guī)制存在局限、反價格壟斷執(zhí)法力量薄弱展開。 二、我國反價格壟斷執(zhí)法存在問題的原因。主要是觀念上對反價格壟斷的重要性認識不足、體制上反價格壟斷執(zhí)法部門獨立性不夠、法律上反價格壟斷法律法規(guī)體系不健全、利益驅動上導致經(jīng)營者會以更隱蔽的方式形成價格壟斷。 三、歐盟反壟斷法律制度和執(zhí)法對我國的啟示。從總結歐盟反壟斷的立法基礎、法律框架、制度框架入手。 四、完善我國反價格壟斷執(zhí)法的對策。主要包括以下幾個方面：完善配套立法，提供制度保障；進行體制改革，保證執(zhí)法獨立性；建立長效機制，規(guī)范價格行為；加強隊伍建設，提升執(zhí)法自信。 最后結論中指出，一方面反價格壟斷執(zhí)法應借鑒國外先進經(jīng)驗，，一方面反價格壟斷執(zhí)法應立足中國國情進行不斷完善。
[Abstract]:Price monopoly undermines the market competition mechanism and damages consumers and public interests. To carry out the law enforcement of anti-price monopoly according to law plays an important role in preventing and stopping price monopoly and protecting fair competition, which is the inherent need of perfecting the socialist market economic system. This article revolves around our country's anti-price monopoly law enforcement experience is still in the initial stage, the anti-price monopoly work faces many challenges, from how to draw lessons from the European Union's law enforcement experience, analyzes our country's anti-price monopoly law enforcement difficulty, explores the feasible countermeasure and so on. Improve the ability and level of law enforcement against price monopoly. The structure of this paper is as follows: introduction part through the research background, research significance, the starting point of the paper topics, research status at home and abroad, the structure of the paper, research methods and ideas and other chapters, The paper's writing ideas are sorted out and standardized. The main body of this paper puts forward the countermeasures to perfect the law enforcement of anti-price monopoly by analyzing the existing problems and the causes of the problems and drawing lessons from the European Union's anti-price monopoly law system and the enlightenment of the law enforcement to our country. This part is divided into four chapters. The specific contents are as follows: first, the problems existing in the enforcement of anti-price monopoly in China. It is the research foundation to analyze the problems existing in the law enforcement of anti-price monopoly. Mainly from the lack of market supervision experience, the lack of a systematic and complete anti-price monopoly system, there are limitations to the administrative monopoly regulation, anti-price monopoly law enforcement force is weak to carry out. Second, the reason that our country anti-price monopoly law enforcement exists problem. It is mainly due to the lack of understanding of the importance of anti-price monopoly, the lack of independence of anti-price monopoly law enforcement departments and the imperfect legal system of anti-price monopoly laws and regulations. Interest-driven causes the operator to form a price monopoly in a more subtle way. Third, EU anti-monopoly legal system and law enforcement to our country enlightenment. From the summary of the EU anti-monopoly legislative basis, legal framework, institutional framework. Fourth, perfect our country anti-price monopoly law enforcement countermeasure. It mainly includes the following aspects: perfect supporting legislation, provide system guarantee; carry out system reform to ensure the independence of law enforcement; establish long-term mechanism, standardize price behavior; strengthen the construction of the team, enhance the confidence of law enforcement. Finally, it is pointed out that, on the one hand, anti-price monopoly law enforcement should draw lessons from foreign advanced experience, and on the other hand, anti-price monopoly law enforcement should be continuously improved on the basis of China's national conditions.
【學位授予單位】：吉林大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D922.294

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前5條

1 于立;姜春海;;自然壟斷產(chǎn)業(yè)的規(guī)制政策研究[J];管理學報;2006年05期

2 于良春;張偉;;中國行業(yè)性行政壟斷的強度與效率損失研究[J];經(jīng)濟研究;2010年03期

3 李鐳;;第二講:我國反價格壟斷的簡要回顧[J];中國價格監(jiān)督檢查;2011年07期

4 黃勇;申耘宇;;第三屆中國競爭政策論壇綜述[J];中國價格監(jiān)管與反壟斷;2014年08期

5 張穹;;我國現(xiàn)階段反壟斷工作的改革使命[J];價格理論與實踐;2014年01期

本文編號：2218454