【摘要】：我國(guó)正處于網(wǎng)絡(luò)爆發(fā)式增長(zhǎng)的時(shí)期,網(wǎng)絡(luò)市場(chǎng)中網(wǎng)絡(luò)企業(yè)寡頭漸見(jiàn)眉頭,占優(yōu)勢(shì)地位的網(wǎng)絡(luò)企業(yè)濫用市場(chǎng)支配地位的現(xiàn)象逐漸增多,損害網(wǎng)絡(luò)市場(chǎng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)和消費(fèi)者利益的情況也日漸加劇。而目前我國(guó)對(duì)于網(wǎng)絡(luò)行業(yè)中出現(xiàn)的濫用支配地位損害競(jìng)爭(zhēng)的行為的研究尚處探討階段,對(duì)出現(xiàn)在反壟斷執(zhí)法實(shí)踐中的網(wǎng)絡(luò)市場(chǎng)性質(zhì)界定不清,相關(guān)市場(chǎng)界定模糊,濫用市場(chǎng)支配地位的行為認(rèn)定不準(zhǔn)確,消費(fèi)者利益沒(méi)有得到充分的保護(hù),存在反壟斷執(zhí)法混亂的現(xiàn)象。究其原因就在于對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)市場(chǎng)的市場(chǎng)性質(zhì)考察不夠充分,對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)市場(chǎng)與傳統(tǒng)市場(chǎng)認(rèn)定濫用市場(chǎng)支配地位之間的關(guān)系沒(méi)有很好捋清,并且執(zhí)行與監(jiān)管之間的權(quán)責(zé)不明、協(xié)調(diào)不足。歐美對(duì)于規(guī)制網(wǎng)絡(luò)市場(chǎng)中濫用市場(chǎng)支配地位的經(jīng)驗(yàn)值得借鑒,我國(guó)在規(guī)制網(wǎng)絡(luò)行業(yè)濫用支配地位行為的方面,應(yīng)當(dāng)將重心放在界定網(wǎng)絡(luò)市場(chǎng)的性質(zhì)特征與傳統(tǒng)認(rèn)定方法的結(jié)合上,優(yōu)化執(zhí)行與監(jiān)管的協(xié)調(diào)、完善我國(guó)承諾執(zhí)行制度、提高對(duì)消費(fèi)者利益的保護(hù),構(gòu)建完善的網(wǎng)絡(luò)行業(yè)濫用市場(chǎng)支配地位的法律規(guī)制體系。
[Abstract]:Our country is in the period of network explosive growth. In the network market, the oligarchs of network enterprises have gradually seen their eyebrows, and the phenomenon of dominant network enterprises abusing their dominant position in the market has gradually increased. The situation that harms network market competition and consumer interest also day by day aggravation. At present, the research on the behavior of abuse of dominant position to damage competition in the network industry in our country is still in the stage of discussion. The nature of the network market appearing in the practice of anti-monopoly law enforcement is not clear, and the definition of the relevant market is vague. The behavior of abusing the dominant position of the market is not accurate, the interests of consumers are not fully protected, and there is confusion in the enforcement of antitrust laws. The reason is that the nature of the network market is not enough, the relationship between the network market and the traditional market to abuse the dominant position of the market is not clear, and the power and responsibility between implementation and supervision are not clear, and the coordination is insufficient. The experience of regulating the abuse of dominant position in the network market in Europe and the United States is worth drawing lessons from, and our country is in the aspect of regulating the abuse of dominant position in the network industry. Emphasis should be placed on the combination of defining the nature of the network market and the traditional identification methods, optimizing the coordination between execution and supervision, perfecting our country's commitment enforcement system, and improving the protection of consumers' interests. Build a perfect network industry abuse of market dominance of the legal regulation system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：暨南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D922.294

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張小強(qiáng);卓光俊;;論網(wǎng)絡(luò)經(jīng)濟(jì)中相關(guān)市場(chǎng)及市場(chǎng)支配地位的界定——評(píng)《中華人民共和國(guó)反壟斷法》相關(guān)規(guī)定[J];重慶大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年05期

2 李太勇;網(wǎng)絡(luò)效應(yīng)與進(jìn)入壁壘:以微軟反壟斷訴訟案為例[J];財(cái)經(jīng)研究;2000年08期

3 劉大為;李凱;;用戶多歸屬與雙邊平臺(tái)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)的均衡分析[J];東北大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2012年01期

4 焦海濤;;我國(guó)經(jīng)營(yíng)者承諾制度的適用與完善[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2012年02期

5 王先林;;論反壟斷法實(shí)施中的相關(guān)市場(chǎng)界定[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2008年01期

6 王曉曄;;關(guān)于我國(guó)反壟斷執(zhí)法機(jī)構(gòu)的幾個(gè)問(wèn)題[J];東岳論叢;2007年01期

7 吳韜;;互聯(lián)網(wǎng)行業(yè)反壟斷案件中的相關(guān)市場(chǎng)界定:美國(guó)的經(jīng)驗(yàn)與啟示[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2011年05期

8 李劍;;百度“競(jìng)價(jià)排名”非濫用市場(chǎng)支配地位行為[J];法學(xué);2009年03期

9 曲振濤;周正;周方召;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)外部性下的電子商務(wù)平臺(tái)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)與規(guī)制——基于雙邊市場(chǎng)理論的研究[J];中國(guó)工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2010年04期

10 蔣巖波;;互聯(lián)網(wǎng)產(chǎn)業(yè)中相關(guān)市場(chǎng)界定的司法困境與出路——基于雙邊市場(chǎng)條件[J];法學(xué)家;2012年06期

，

本文編號(hào)：2198668