發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-08-05 17:51

【摘要】：商業(yè)秘密因具有的巨大商業(yè)價(jià)值而與企業(yè)的生存、發(fā)展緊密關(guān)聯(lián),而這也導(dǎo)致其被侵犯的現(xiàn)象時(shí)有發(fā)生。作為商業(yè)秘密侵權(quán)認(rèn)定的前置性條件——商業(yè)秘密的認(rèn)定,在司法實(shí)踐中主要圍繞其秘密性、保密性、價(jià)值性三大要件展開。通過對(duì)12年間上海審結(jié)的72件關(guān)于商業(yè)秘密糾紛案件的梳理、研究,發(fā)現(xiàn)一個(gè)普遍性問題:法院對(duì)這些要件的認(rèn)定很多時(shí)候并不妥當(dāng),有些要件的認(rèn)定甚至被忽略。對(duì)此,還需從各要件背后的理論對(duì)存在的問題進(jìn)行分析,并以此為基礎(chǔ)解決商業(yè)秘密認(rèn)定中出現(xiàn)的一般性問題。首先,秘密性作為基礎(chǔ)性要件,不管訴爭(zhēng)信息形式上是否公知,均應(yīng)當(dāng)滿足其可區(qū)別于普通信息的部分未被公開、同行業(yè)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)者難以獲得。其次,對(duì)于保密性,保密措施本身的有效存在是前提,特殊情形下對(duì)其認(rèn)定還應(yīng)考慮被告的特殊身份;保密范圍是權(quán)利人保密意志的體現(xiàn),它應(yīng)明確包含涉案秘密點(diǎn);保密措施須合理有效,落實(shí)到商業(yè)秘密保護(hù)的各環(huán)節(jié)并使保密義務(wù)人能夠知悉保密對(duì)象;對(duì)保密性的認(rèn)定應(yīng)堅(jiān)持主客觀相一致原則。最后,價(jià)值性是商業(yè)秘密能得到法律保護(hù)的原因;對(duì)其認(rèn)定應(yīng)綜合考慮權(quán)利人對(duì)信息付出的是形成該信息的勞動(dòng),且該信息具有應(yīng)用的可能性,對(duì)其擁有與使用帶來的價(jià)值較同類信息有最起碼的優(yōu)勢(shì)。
[Abstract]:Because of its great commercial value, trade secret is closely related to the survival and development of the enterprise, which leads to the phenomenon that it is violated from time to time. As the pre-condition of the trade secret infringement, the commercial secret is mainly defined around its secrecy, confidentiality and value in the judicial practice. By combing 72 cases of trade secret disputes concluded in Shanghai in the past 12 years, the author finds a general problem: the court's determination of these elements is often inappropriate, and some elements are even ignored. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze the existing problems from the theory behind the various elements, and to solve the general problems in the identification of trade secrets on the basis of this. First of all, secrecy as a basic element, regardless of whether the form of information is known or not, should be satisfied that the part of information that can be distinguished from ordinary information is not disclosed, and it is difficult for competitors in the same industry to obtain it. Secondly, for confidentiality, the effective existence of confidentiality measures itself is the premise, the special identity of the defendant should be considered in the special circumstances, the scope of confidentiality is the embodiment of the will of the obligee to keep secret, and it should include the secret points involved in the case. The secrecy measures should be reasonable and effective, be carried out in all aspects of the protection of trade secrets and enable the confidentiality obligor to know the object of secrecy, and the principle of consistency between subject and objective should be adhered to in the determination of confidentiality. Finally, the value is the reason why the trade secret can be protected by law, and it should be considered synthetically that what the obligee pays to the information is the labor that forms the information, and the information has the possibility of application. The value of its possession and use has a minimum advantage over that of the same kind of information.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：安徽師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D922.294

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 顧韜;;關(guān)于侵害技術(shù)秘密糾紛案件審理思路及方法的探討[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2015年12期

2 沈玉忠;;客戶名單商業(yè)秘密法律屬性之界定[J];中國(guó)檢察官;2015年22期

3 鄧恒;;商業(yè)秘密司法鑒定之實(shí)踐檢討[J];知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2015年05期

4 周寧;盧恒飛;;侵犯商業(yè)秘密罪的司法認(rèn)定——以50份刑事判決書為基礎(chǔ)的分析[J];福建法學(xué);2014年03期

5 張玲玲;張傳磊;;經(jīng)營(yíng)類信息構(gòu)成商業(yè)秘密的司法認(rèn)定 以未出版書稿的商業(yè)秘密保護(hù)為視角[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2014年08期

6 史仲凱;;客戶名單商業(yè)秘密侵權(quán)糾紛審理中的有關(guān)問題——以權(quán)益平衡為視角[J];知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2014年04期

7 陳愛華;;日本關(guān)于侵犯商業(yè)秘密行為的認(rèn)定[J];知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2013年07期

8 付國(guó)濤;;企業(yè)商業(yè)秘密保護(hù)對(duì)策[J];企業(yè)改革與管理;2013年05期

9 張素英;;破解商業(yè)秘密范圍確認(rèn)難題[J];保密工作;2013年04期

10 鮑陸文英;;客戶名單作為商業(yè)秘密的保護(hù)的認(rèn)定——以美國(guó)法為視角[J];華北科技學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年02期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 吳振國(guó);客戶名單商業(yè)秘密侵權(quán)糾紛疑難法律問題研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2013年

2 繆龍江;論我國(guó)商業(yè)秘密的認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)及其完善[D];湖南大學(xué);2010年

3 鄭雅雯;中英商業(yè)秘密保護(hù)法律制度比較研究[D];暨南大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：2166538