【摘要】：21世紀(jì)是經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化的時(shí)代,知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)已成為衡量一國的國際競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力的核心要素。其中,在技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)中融入專利是企業(yè)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)的最有力武器,它不僅有助于提高企業(yè)生產(chǎn)效益、形成規(guī)模效應(yīng),而且能夠保障消費(fèi)者的基本安全健康、便利消費(fèi)者的生活。然而,標(biāo)準(zhǔn)必要專利權(quán)人在許可過程中容易在相關(guān)市場(chǎng)形成壟斷并獲超額利潤(rùn),從而對(duì)正常的市場(chǎng)秩序造成破壞。所以,對(duì)濫用標(biāo)準(zhǔn)必要專利的許可行為進(jìn)行反壟斷規(guī)制非常必要。濫用標(biāo)準(zhǔn)必要專利壟斷行為實(shí)質(zhì)上是一種濫用知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的壟斷行為。在反壟斷的分析框架方面,它與一般的財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)利并無很大差別。然而,由于標(biāo)準(zhǔn)必要專利具有其特點(diǎn),因此在適用合理原則時(shí)需要考量幾個(gè)特殊的因素。目前我國對(duì)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)必要專利的壟斷行為仍缺乏針對(duì)性和可操作性的法律法規(guī),因此本文建議在完善《反壟斷法》的基礎(chǔ)上,制定知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)領(lǐng)域的反壟斷執(zhí)法指南,同時(shí)就標(biāo)準(zhǔn)必要專利許可行為作詳細(xì)的反壟斷規(guī)定。
[Abstract]:The 21st century is the era of economic globalization. Intellectual property has become the core factor to measure a country's international competitiveness. Among them, it is the most powerful weapon of enterprise competition to incorporate patent into the technical standard. It is not only helpful to improve the efficiency of enterprise production and form scale effect, but also can guarantee the basic safety and health of consumers and facilitate the life of consumers. However, the standard essential patentee in the licensing process is easy to form a monopoly in the relevant market and obtain excess profits, thus causing damage to the normal market order. Therefore, it is necessary to regulate the licensing of abuse of standard essential patents. Abuse of standard necessary patent monopoly is essentially a monopoly of abuse of intellectual property rights. In the framework of antitrust analysis, it is not very different from property rights in general. However, due to the characteristics of standard essential patents, several special factors need to be taken into account in the application of the principle of reasonableness. At present, the monopoly behavior of the standard necessary patent in our country is still lack of pertinent and operable laws and regulations. Therefore, this paper suggests that, on the basis of perfecting the Anti-Monopoly Law, we should formulate an anti-monopoly law enforcement guide in the field of intellectual property rights. At the same time, the standard necessary patent licensing behavior to make detailed anti-monopoly provisions.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：暨南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D922.294

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李祖明;;標(biāo)準(zhǔn)與知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)[J];法學(xué)雜志;2004年01期

2 王先林;;從微軟壟斷案看知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用的反壟斷控制[J];法學(xué)家;2001年03期

3 馮曉青;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)、競(jìng)爭(zhēng)與反壟斷之關(guān)系探析[J];法學(xué);2004年03期

4 王先林;;制定知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)領(lǐng)域反壟斷執(zhí)法指南的幾個(gè)問題[J];工商行政管理;2009年17期

5 史少華;;標(biāo)準(zhǔn)必要專利訴訟引發(fā)的思考 FRAND原則與禁令[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2014年01期

6 吳廣海;;專利權(quán)行使中拒絕交易的反壟斷法規(guī)制[J];江蘇社會(huì)科學(xué);2008年01期

7 羅玉中,彭志剛;美國、日本和歐盟法律對(duì)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)國際許可反壟斷管制的比較研究[J];江西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2004年04期

8 康佑發(fā);;反壟斷法規(guī)制知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用之立法探討——以知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)與反壟斷法相互關(guān)系為視角[J];科技與法律;2008年01期

9 劉淑華;彭本輝;;標(biāo)準(zhǔn)專利權(quán)濫用的反壟斷法限制[J];蘭州學(xué)刊;2006年07期

10 羅靜;;論反壟斷法中的消費(fèi)者福利保護(hù)——以知識(shí)經(jīng)濟(jì)為背景[J];消費(fèi)經(jīng)濟(jì);2008年01期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 張聯(lián)慶;論專利權(quán)交叉許可及專利池許可模式的反壟斷規(guī)制——美國的理論與實(shí)踐[D];對(duì)外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué);2004年

2 葛勛;論反壟斷法的合理原則[D];江西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2006年

3 唐嬌;技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)中專利權(quán)濫用行為及對(duì)其的反壟斷規(guī)制[D];廣東外語外貿(mào)大學(xué);2008年

，

本文編號(hào)：2163991