本文選題：票據(jù)無(wú)因性 + 票據(jù)關(guān)系�。� 參考：《湖南大學(xué)》2016年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著我國(guó)社會(huì)主義市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)體系的不斷發(fā)展和完善,票據(jù)日益成為社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)活動(dòng)中不可或缺的金融工具各類(lèi)票據(jù)糾紛也呈現(xiàn)出不斷上升的趨勢(shì)�！吨腥A人民,共和國(guó)票據(jù)法》自1996年正式實(shí)施以來(lái)對(duì)于規(guī)范票據(jù)行為,指導(dǎo)票據(jù)活動(dòng)及,,時(shí)、準(zhǔn)確處理票據(jù)糾紛提供了可靠的法律保障。在司法實(shí)踐中如何更加清晰有效,地界定票據(jù)關(guān)系與票據(jù)基礎(chǔ)關(guān)系、熟練準(zhǔn)確地分析和確認(rèn)票據(jù)效力、確認(rèn)票據(jù)當(dāng)事人行為是否違法并公平合理地計(jì)量由此所帶來(lái)的票據(jù)損害賠償責(zé)任大小,是處理票據(jù)糾紛案件、防范票據(jù)業(yè)務(wù)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)急需解決的現(xiàn)實(shí)問(wèn)題。在富興擔(dān)保公司訴君山農(nóng)信聯(lián)社票據(jù)損害賠償案中,富興擔(dān)保公司認(rèn)為君山農(nóng)信聯(lián)社違法承付與預(yù)留印鑒不符的無(wú)效支票造成了富興擔(dān)保公司800萬(wàn)元存款流失隨將君山農(nóng)信聯(lián)社告,,上法庭請(qǐng)求判定君山農(nóng)信聯(lián)社賠償其損失。圍繞案由、涉案支票效力以及承付行,為是否違法等爭(zhēng)議焦點(diǎn),歷經(jīng)一審、二審和三次再審過(guò)程,最高人民法院最終判定君山農(nóng)信聯(lián)社不承擔(dān)賠償責(zé)任,駁回富興擔(dān)保公司的訴訟請(qǐng)求。正確處理本案的關(guān)鍵在于區(qū)分票據(jù)關(guān)系和票據(jù)基礎(chǔ)關(guān)系,正確認(rèn)識(shí)票據(jù)無(wú)因性原則的內(nèi)涵及其相對(duì)性。本案之所以歷經(jīng)五次審理,就在于審判人員對(duì)票據(jù)原理和票據(jù)法存在理解和認(rèn)識(shí)上的差異,在適用法律上出現(xiàn)偏差。作為司法審判人員和金融行業(yè)從業(yè)者,均應(yīng)該從法理角度和市場(chǎng)管理角度思考票據(jù)無(wú)因性原則的法律適用和票據(jù)業(yè)務(wù)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)防范措施,以維護(hù)票據(jù)當(dāng)事人的合法權(quán)益和金融秩序的穩(wěn)定。
[Abstract]:With the continuous development and improvement of the socialist market economy system in China, the disputes over various kinds of bills, which are increasingly becoming indispensable financial instruments in social and economic activities, are also showing a rising trend. < Chinese people, Since its implementation in 1996, the Bill Law of the Republic has provided a reliable legal guarantee for standardizing the bill behavior, guiding the bill activities and handling the bill disputes accurately. In judicial practice, how to define the relationship between bills and the basic relationship of bills, and how to analyze and confirm the validity of bills skillfully and accurately, It is an urgent problem to deal with the bill dispute cases and to prevent the business risks of bills to be solved to confirm whether the behavior of the parties to the bill is illegal and to measure the liability of the bill damage compensation fairly and reasonably. In the case of Fuxing Guaranty Company v. Junshan Peasant letter Association bill damages, The Fuxing guarantee Company considered that the invalid check which was not in accordance with the reserve seal illegally committed by Junshan Rural Credit Union resulted in the loss of 8 million yuan deposit of the Fuxing guarantee Company and sued Junshan Rural Credit Union, and went to court to claim that Junshan Rural Credit Union would compensate for its loss. Around the cause of the case, the validity of the cheque involved and the commitment of the bank, and in order to determine whether or not to violate the law, the Supreme people's Court finally decided that Junshan Rural Credit Union would not be liable for compensation after the process of first, second and third retrial. To reject the suit of Fuxing guarantee Company. The key to deal with the case correctly lies in distinguishing the bill relationship from the basic one, and correctly understanding the connotation and relativity of the principle of the non-causality of the bill. The reason why the case went through five trials is that the judges have different understanding and understanding of the principle of instruments and the law of instruments, and there are deviations in the application of the law. As judicial judges and financial practitioners, they should consider the legal application of the principle of non-causality of bills and the risk prevention measures of bill business from the point of view of legal theory and market management. In order to maintain the legitimate rights and interests of the parties to the bill and the stability of the financial order.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D922.287

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉嘯宇;賀光;李曉東;;河曲農(nóng)信聯(lián)社惠農(nóng)工程亮點(diǎn)紛呈[J];政府法制;2008年19期

2 秦濤;李唯睿;;為農(nóng)民建房送上“源頭活水”——沿河農(nóng)信聯(lián)社支持“四在農(nóng)家·美麗鄉(xiāng)村”建設(shè)側(cè)記[J];當(dāng)代貴州;2014年12期

3 賀生云;支慧強(qiáng);安穎博;;做強(qiáng)特色產(chǎn)業(yè) 打造知名品牌 惠及三農(nóng)發(fā)展——多倫縣農(nóng)信聯(lián)社支持“一縣一品”促農(nóng)增收的調(diào)研[J];實(shí)踐(思想理論版);2012年10期

4 文葉飛;秦濤;熊鶴;張運(yùn)典;;德江縣農(nóng)信聯(lián)社:與農(nóng)“同耕”抒寫(xiě)大地詩(shī)行[J];當(dāng)代貴州;2010年13期

5 ;服務(wù)“三農(nóng)”為使命 新農(nóng)村建設(shè)譜新篇[J];學(xué)習(xí)月刊;2012年20期

6 文葉飛;秦濤;羅翔;田洪斌;;六年磨劍蓄勢(shì)展翼躍錦江——貴州省農(nóng)信聯(lián)社銅仁辦事處在解構(gòu)與聚合中探尋發(fā)展空間[J];當(dāng)代貴州;2010年15期

7 ;博大胸襟載信合——品牌化鑄就堯都區(qū)農(nóng)信聯(lián)社騰飛[J];紅旗文稿;2006年23期

8 ;著力破解資金難題 大力助推青年創(chuàng)業(yè)[J];寧波通訊;2009年10期

9 ;根植大地的銀行 遍布城鄉(xiāng)的銀行 服務(wù)三農(nóng)的銀行 造福民生的銀行[J];福建理論學(xué)習(xí);2010年08期

10 ;[J];;年期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條

1 李銓斌　張勇 陳瑩;臨淄農(nóng)信國(guó)際業(yè)務(wù)實(shí)現(xiàn)新突破[N];淄博日?qǐng)?bào);2009年

2 胡朝暉;哈市農(nóng)信聯(lián)社20億亂賬迷霧[N];中國(guó)經(jīng)營(yíng)報(bào);2005年

3 記者 徐露 林建偉 通訊員 朱思爽;省農(nóng)信聯(lián)社成支農(nóng)支小主力軍[N];湖北日?qǐng)?bào);2012年

4 陳過(guò)房;江西農(nóng)信聯(lián)社存款突破3000億元[N];中國(guó)農(nóng)村信用合作報(bào);2012年

5 顧名;廣東農(nóng)信聯(lián)社加速處置不良資產(chǎn)[N];第一財(cái)經(jīng)日?qǐng)?bào);2007年

6 記者 鄧洪濤 通訊員 東升 思爽 林忠;省農(nóng)信聯(lián)社扶農(nóng)戶(hù)壯企業(yè)[N];湖北日?qǐng)?bào);2007年

7 房燕 秦鵬;肥城農(nóng)信聯(lián)社堅(jiān)持以人為本促發(fā)展[N];中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)時(shí)報(bào);2006年

8 記者　 李曉美;湖北農(nóng)信聯(lián)社改革工作順利推進(jìn)[N];金融時(shí)報(bào);2006年

9 雷有林　劉合芳 王慶林;靈壽農(nóng)信聯(lián)社支農(nóng)堅(jiān)持“三個(gè)結(jié)合”[N];金融時(shí)報(bào);2007年

10 溫躍邋朱鋒義 張君;萊蕪農(nóng)信聯(lián)社搭建小生產(chǎn)通向大市場(chǎng)橋梁[N];金融時(shí)報(bào);2007年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 徐迪;富興擔(dān)保公司訴君山農(nóng)信聯(lián)社票據(jù)損害賠償糾紛案例分析[D];湖南大學(xué);2016年

2 趙偉;J市太和區(qū)農(nóng)信聯(lián)社的經(jīng)營(yíng)績(jī)效研究[D];大連海事大學(xué);2014年

3 王朔;TH農(nóng)信聯(lián)社信用風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理研究[D];大連海事大學(xué);2014年

，

本文編號(hào)：2108931