本文選題：國(guó)家出資人代表 + 國(guó)資委　； 參考：《湖南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版)》2016年05期

【摘要】：公司中經(jīng)國(guó)資委委派或推選的董事及監(jiān)事,負(fù)有公法上的國(guó)有資產(chǎn)經(jīng)營(yíng)監(jiān)督職責(zé),其對(duì)國(guó)資委當(dāng)承擔(dān)公法責(zé)任。當(dāng)前的責(zé)任制度設(shè)計(jì),多圍繞其董事、監(jiān)事的私法身份展開,無法為公法責(zé)任的追究提供充分的依據(jù)。經(jīng)濟(jì)處罰、行政處分及禁入限制等制度存在諸多缺陷,不能滿足實(shí)踐的需要。為此,需從國(guó)家出資人代表公法責(zé)任的來源入手,分析現(xiàn)行責(zé)任方式的正當(dāng)性與合法性,圍繞國(guó)家出資人代表的公職特性構(gòu)建其公法責(zé)任。
[Abstract]:The directors and supervisors appointed or elected by SASAC shall be responsible for the management and supervision of state-owned assets in public law. The current design of liability system mainly revolves around the private status of directors and supervisors, which can not provide sufficient basis for the investigation of public law liability. The system of economic punishment, administrative punishment and prohibition of entry has many defects and can not meet the needs of practice. Therefore, it is necessary to start with the source of the public law responsibility of the state investor, to analyze the legitimacy and legitimacy of the current responsibility mode, and to construct its public law responsibility around the public function characteristics of the state investor representative.
【作者單位】： 湖南大學(xué)法學(xué)院;湖南警察學(xué)院法律系;
【基金】：國(guó)家社科基金項(xiàng)目:“政府董事法律制度研究”(15BFX169) 湖南省哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)基金項(xiàng)目:“企業(yè)國(guó)家出資人代表制度研究”(13YBA123)
【分類號(hào)】：D922.291.91

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 蔣科;屈茂輝;;企業(yè)國(guó)家出資人代表類型的實(shí)態(tài)及其優(yōu)化[J];福建警察學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2013年05期

2 焦云芳;;乘風(fēng)揚(yáng)帆正當(dāng)時(shí)——上海交運(yùn)(集團(tuán))公司在改革中創(chuàng)新監(jiān)管工作[J];中國(guó)監(jiān)察;2006年15期

3 王健君;國(guó)資委“出航”慎過四關(guān)[J];w攣胖蕓，

本文編號(hào)：2104197