本文選題：相對經(jīng)濟(jì)優(yōu)勢地位 + 合同法��； 參考：《山西大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著買方優(yōu)勢及雙邊市場的形成,大型零售商目前在零供市場中逐漸占據(jù)了主導(dǎo)地位,他們常常利用自己的相對經(jīng)濟(jì)優(yōu)勢地位壓榨供應(yīng)商,通過濫收通道費(fèi)等行為轉(zhuǎn)嫁經(jīng)營成本,使得自身利益最大化,這對零供市場的破壞不言而喻,而且對消費(fèi)者的利益也造成了不同程度的損害。這樣的現(xiàn)象對于經(jīng)濟(jì)市場的競爭發(fā)展來說是極大的阻礙,必須對其進(jìn)行規(guī)制,以優(yōu)化市場競爭環(huán)境。文章結(jié)構(gòu)主要分為四大部分。第一部分選取了上海市浦東新區(qū)人民法院的合同糾紛案,通過對案件進(jìn)行簡單介紹,挖掘矛盾的根源,引出市場中濫用相對經(jīng)濟(jì)優(yōu)勢地位的行為較多且缺少合理的規(guī)制辦法的現(xiàn)實(shí)問題;第二部分為濫用相對經(jīng)濟(jì)優(yōu)勢地位的表現(xiàn)及現(xiàn)實(shí)危害。首先闡述濫用相對經(jīng)濟(jì)優(yōu)勢地位的含義。其次論述濫用該地位的具體表現(xiàn),如過度收取通道費(fèi)、拖欠供應(yīng)商貨款、限制價(jià)格等。最后揭示濫用相對經(jīng)濟(jì)優(yōu)勢地位會對零售業(yè)的競爭發(fā)展以及消費(fèi)者的利益造成實(shí)質(zhì)危害,體現(xiàn)出規(guī)制該類行為的必要性;第三部分是世界各國(地區(qū))法律規(guī)制濫用相對經(jīng)濟(jì)優(yōu)勢地位的比較分析,主要對各國(地區(qū))的立法模式和法律規(guī)定該行為濫用的形式進(jìn)行比較;第四部分提出我國現(xiàn)行《合同法》、《反不正當(dāng)競爭法》和《反壟斷法》中對濫用相對經(jīng)濟(jì)優(yōu)勢地位規(guī)制的不足之處,并且結(jié)合《反不正當(dāng)競爭法(修訂草案送審稿)》提出對規(guī)制濫用相對經(jīng)濟(jì)優(yōu)勢地位的完善建議,希望能夠盡早尋求有效機(jī)制解決此類問題。
[Abstract]:With the formation of buyer advantage and bilateral market, large retailers are gradually taking the dominant position in the zero-supply market. They often use their comparative economic advantage to squeeze suppliers. Through excessive collection of channel fees and other behaviors to pass on the operating costs to maximize their own interests, this damage to the zero-supply market is self-evident, and the interests of consumers have also caused varying degrees of damage. This phenomenon is a great hindrance to the development of economic market competition, it must be regulated in order to optimize the market competition environment. The structure of the article is divided into four parts. The first part selects the contract dispute case of Shanghai Pudong New area people's Court, through the simple introduction of the case, excavates the root of the contradiction. It leads to the practical problems of abuse of relative economic advantage in the market and the lack of reasonable regulation methods. The second part is about the performance and actual harm of abuse of relative economic advantage. First of all, the meaning of abusing the position of relative economic advantage is expounded. Secondly, it discusses the concrete manifestation of abuse of this position, such as excessive collection of passage fee, default of supplier payment, restriction of price and so on. Finally, it is revealed that the abuse of the relative economic advantage status will cause substantial harm to the development of the retail industry and the interests of consumers, which reflects the necessity of regulating this kind of behavior; The third part is the comparative analysis of the relative economic advantage status of the countries (regions) in the world. It mainly compares the legislative models and the forms of abuse stipulated by the laws of the countries (regions). In the fourth part, the author points out the deficiencies in the regulation of abuse of the position of relative economic advantage in China's current contract Law, Anti-unfair Competition Law and Anti-monopoly Law. In the light of "Anti-unfair Competition Law" (revised draft to be submitted for review), this paper puts forward some suggestions on how to regulate the abuse of the relative economic advantage, hoping to find an effective mechanism to solve this kind of problem as soon as possible.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山西大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D922.294

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 楊莉萍;;“通道費(fèi)”問題類型化解決的可行性[J];學(xué)術(shù)論壇;2016年07期

2 王曉曄;;論濫用“相對優(yōu)勢地位”的法律規(guī)制[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2016年05期

3 袁嘉;;德國濫用相對優(yōu)勢地位行為規(guī)制研究——相對交易優(yōu)勢地位與相對市場優(yōu)勢地位的區(qū)分[J];法治研究;2016年05期

4 謝佩洪;陳德金;;大型零售平臺企業(yè)通道費(fèi)贏利模式問題研究述評與展望[J];中國流通經(jīng)濟(jì);2016年06期

5 朱理;;濫用相對優(yōu)勢地位問題的法律規(guī)制——虛幻的敵人與真實(shí)的危險(xiǎn)[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2016年06期

6 張昕;;企業(yè)濫用相對優(yōu)勢地位規(guī)制研究[J];競爭政策研究;2016年03期

7 劉紹奎;;競爭法視角下的通道費(fèi)問題——兼論對濫用市場相對優(yōu)勢地位行為的法律規(guī)制[J];法制博覽;2015年10期

8 吳沛瑾;;反壟斷法對濫用相對市場優(yōu)勢地位規(guī)制研究[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2014年09期

9 張翼飛;;反壟斷法規(guī)制濫用相對優(yōu)勢地位理論“正名”——對質(zhì)疑說的回應(yīng)[J];理論月刊;2011年09期

10 王亞南;;濫用相對優(yōu)勢地位問題的反壟斷法理分析與規(guī)制——以大型零售企業(yè)收取“通道費(fèi)”為切入視角[J];法學(xué)雜志;2011年05期

，

本文編號：2096465