本文選題：有財產(chǎn)擔(dān)保債權(quán) + 公平正義��； 參考：《中央民族大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：我國《企業(yè)破產(chǎn)法》自2006年通過之后,2007年破產(chǎn)重整制度正式實施,創(chuàng)造了新的經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展模式。我國破產(chǎn)法的制定就是為了保護(hù)債權(quán)人的利益,重整制度的出現(xiàn)適應(yīng)了我國現(xiàn)階段國情,同時兼顧了債權(quán)人債務(wù)人與社會發(fā)展相適應(yīng)等其他利害相關(guān)主體的利益,但我國對于重整制度的實行畢竟不如國外的徹底和完善,這依然是一項十分復(fù)雜值得我們探究的制度,而有擔(dān)保債權(quán)人的利益保護(hù)堪稱是整個商業(yè)重整(重組)活動中的重頭戲,所以我們?nèi)杂斜匾獙ζ渲械闹匾蓡栴}進(jìn)行研究,更好的完善該制度。我的畢業(yè)論文分為三個部分:第一部分分析界定了有財產(chǎn)擔(dān)保債權(quán)的基本理論。首先,對有財產(chǎn)擔(dān)保債權(quán)的含義進(jìn)行了界定,并羅列了有財產(chǎn)擔(dān)保債權(quán)的類型。其次,對其進(jìn)行定性分析,然后著重討論了為什么要大力保護(hù)有財產(chǎn)擔(dān)保債權(quán)人的目的及意義,主要從經(jīng)濟(jì)利益以及司法公平兩個方面進(jìn)行討論。第二部分,分析我國公司企業(yè)破產(chǎn)重組中關(guān)于財產(chǎn)擔(dān)保債權(quán)人利益保護(hù)現(xiàn)存的問題。主要從適用對象的范圍和條件,自動中止制度,有擔(dān)保債權(quán)人的監(jiān)督機(jī)制,強制批準(zhǔn)制度,重整計劃制定主體,損害補償機(jī)制這六個方面存在的問題進(jìn)行分析,結(jié)合我國現(xiàn)有的規(guī)定以及對有擔(dān)保債權(quán)人的限制,詳細(xì)的分析了其中的不足之處。第三部分,針對上一個部分分析出的不足之處,有的放矢地提出了對公司企業(yè)破產(chǎn)重整中對債權(quán)人利益保護(hù)的相關(guān)的完善建議。例如:縮小適用范圍提高門檻,將重整的適用條件規(guī)定為有再生和重建希望的債務(wù)人;建立中國特色的充分保護(hù)原則,自動凍結(jié)允許存在例外;把有擔(dān)保債權(quán)人列入到監(jiān)督機(jī)構(gòu)的組成人員和重整計劃的制定主體中;對重整期間擔(dān)保物的損壞做區(qū)分分別進(jìn)行補償?shù)鹊取?br/>[Abstract]:Since the adoption of the Enterprise bankruptcy Law in 2006, the bankruptcy reorganization system was formally implemented in 2007, which created a new economic development model. The formulation of China's bankruptcy law is to protect the interests of creditors. The emergence of the reorganization system adapts to the current situation of our country, and at the same time takes into account the interests of other stakeholders, such as creditors, debtors, and social development. However, the implementation of the reorganization system in our country is after all not as thorough and perfect as that of the foreign countries. This is still a very complex system worthy of our exploration. The interests of secured creditors can be called as the main part of the whole commercial reorganization (reorganization), so we still need to study the important legal issues, better improve the system. My thesis is divided into three parts: the first part defines the basic theory of property secured claims. Firstly, the definition of property secured claims is defined, and the types of property secured claims are listed. Secondly, it is analyzed qualitatively, and then the purpose and significance of protecting the secured creditor of property is discussed emphatically, mainly from the two aspects of economic interests and judicial fairness. The second part analyzes the existing problems about the protection of the interests of the property secured creditors in the bankruptcy reorganization of Chinese companies. Mainly from the scope and conditions of the applicable object, the automatic suspension system, the supervision mechanism of the secured creditor, the compulsory approval system, the main body of the reorganization plan formulation, the damage compensation mechanism and so on. Combined with the existing regulations and the restrictions on secured creditors, the deficiencies are analyzed in detail. In the third part, aiming at the shortcomings of the last part, the author puts forward some suggestions on how to protect the interests of creditors in the corporate bankruptcy reorganization. For example, reducing the scope of application and raising the threshold, setting the applicable conditions of reorganization as debtors with the prospect of regeneration and reconstruction, establishing the principle of adequate protection with Chinese characteristics, allowing exceptions to exist in automatic freezing; The secured creditor is included in the members of the supervisory body and the main body of the reorganization plan, and the damage of the collateral during the reorganization period is compensated separately, etc.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中央民族大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D922.291.92

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王欣新;宋玉霞;;重整計劃強制批準(zhǔn)法律問題研究[J];江漢論壇;2014年10期

2 殷西軍;;破產(chǎn)法對債權(quán)人利益保護(hù)的缺陷研究[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2014年08期

3 任潔;;重整程序中有擔(dān)保債權(quán)人利益保護(hù)的必要性探討[J];商業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2013年16期

4 張澎;彭輝;;企業(yè)破產(chǎn)重整計劃制定和批準(zhǔn)若干問題的研究[J];法律適用;2013年06期

5 張握;;企業(yè)破產(chǎn)重整的認(rèn)知及運行問題[J];商事法論集;2012年01期

6 季境;田曉;;有擔(dān)保債權(quán)在公司重整程序中的限制[J];法學(xué)雜志;2012年04期

7 陳本寒;陳英;;破產(chǎn)重整中有擔(dān)保債權(quán)行使問題之檢討[J];甘肅政法學(xué)院學(xué)報;2011年02期

8 賈純;;企業(yè)破產(chǎn)重整中債權(quán)人利益保護(hù)研究[J];金融理論與實踐;2011年01期

9 王欣新;;試論重整制度之立法完善[J];昆明理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2010年05期

10 朱明陽;;試論破產(chǎn)重整中銀行擔(dān)保債權(quán)的限制與保護(hù)[J];重慶廣播電視大學(xué)學(xué)報;2010年04期

，

本文編號：2025913