本文選題：規(guī)劃義務 + 立法結構�。� 參考：《法律科學(西北政法大學學報)》2017年02期

【摘要】：實體法上規(guī)劃保證義務的缺失和責任機制的疏漏是立法范疇內規(guī)劃赤字失范現象的癥結。我國既有的規(guī)劃保證義務立法結構是國家《城鄉(xiāng)規(guī)劃法》保留程序性框架基本內容,將實質內容下沉給部門特別法或地方立法填充,這一立法模式存在國家立法框架性指導空洞化和地方立法割據的結構性問題�！冻青l(xiāng)規(guī)劃法》作為國家立法,對規(guī)劃調整自由裁量的法定限制應具有綱領性實質內容,通過對規(guī)劃保證義務實體標準核心要件的規(guī)定,實現從程序規(guī)制向實體規(guī)制的轉化。在國家立法與地方立法的關系問題上,一種通過完善強制性位階審查制度,重點調整規(guī)劃保證義務立法結構中"中央—地方"縱向關系;一種通過開創(chuàng)符合中國現實的城市更新地方示范法,側重調整規(guī)劃保證義務立法結構中"地方—地方"橫向關系。兩種模式互補與互助的適用,將對規(guī)劃保證義務立法形成網格規(guī)制的理想結構模型。
[Abstract]:The deficiency of planning guarantee obligation and the omission of responsibility mechanism in substantive law are the crux of the phenomenon of irregular planning deficit in the scope of legislation. The existing legislative structure of the obligation of planning guarantee in China is the basic content of the procedural framework retained by the National Urban and Rural Planning Law, which sinks the substantive content into the special law of the department or local legislation. This legislative model has the structural problems of the blank guidance of the national legislative framework and the separation of local legislation. As a national legislation, the statutory restrictions on the discretion of planning adjustment should have programmatic substance. The transformation from procedural regulation to substantive regulation is realized through the provision of the core elements of the substantive standard of the obligation of planning guarantee. On the question of the relationship between national legislation and local legislation, a kind of vertical relationship between "central and local" in the legislative structure of planning guarantee obligation should be adjusted by perfecting the compulsory rank examination system. A kind of local model law is updated by creating a city in line with the reality of China, focusing on adjusting the "local-local" horizontal relationship in the legislative structure of the planning guarantee obligation. The application of complementary and mutual assistance between the two modes will form the ideal structure model of grid regulation for the legislation of planning guarantee obligation.
【作者單位】： 同濟大學法學院;
【基金】：上海市浦江人才計劃項目(14PJC105)“城市社區(qū)住房管理法律制度研究” 同濟大學中央高�；究蒲袠I(yè)務費資助
【分類號】：D922.297

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前8條

1 沈紅雨;淺議我國的證券投資基金立法結構[J];河北法學;1999年02期

2 張竹英;略論我國企業(yè)兼并立法結構的優(yōu)化[J];廣東經濟;1999年05期

3 張竹英;略論我國企業(yè)兼并立法結構的優(yōu)化[J];科學·經濟·社會;1999年03期

4 張勝前,童德華;論妨害社會管理秩序類罪立法結構存在的問題[J];江西公安專科學校學報;2001年01期

5 希朋賽;;中國—老撾兩國外資立法具體制度比較[J];云南大學學報(法學版);2006年04期

6 葉林;劉向林;;論我國公司法立法結構的變革[J];政法論叢;2010年03期

7 羅晉京;秦建國;;對海南省文化產業(yè)立法的思考——深圳、太原文化產業(yè)立法經驗考察啟示[J];新東方;2013年02期

8 ;[J];;年期

相關重要報紙文章 前1條

1 ;所有權的類型及其立法結構[N];中國社會科學院院報;2006年

，

本文編號：2025654