本文選題：出資瑕疵 + 股東權(quán)利�。� 參考：《廣東財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：針對(duì)現(xiàn)實(shí)中越來(lái)越嚴(yán)峻的出資瑕疵問(wèn)題,通過(guò)讓股東承擔(dān)相應(yīng)的違約責(zé)任以及補(bǔ)繳出資義務(wù)等傳統(tǒng)的手段顯然已不足以妥善解決。若要更好地督促股東及時(shí)補(bǔ)足出資,應(yīng)當(dāng)對(duì)其表決權(quán)進(jìn)行適當(dāng)限制,削弱其在公司經(jīng)營(yíng)管理當(dāng)中的話語(yǔ)權(quán),從而間接影響其在公司中獲取的收益,令之主動(dòng)履行出資義務(wù),維護(hù)公司和其他股東等利益相關(guān)人的權(quán)益。本文旨在探討是否應(yīng)對(duì)出資瑕疵的股東的表決權(quán)加以限制,并針對(duì)限制的具體途徑提供相應(yīng)的對(duì)策建議。本文的第一章,主要闡述瑕疵出資的含義和相關(guān)的類型,并討論出資瑕疵是否會(huì)對(duì)股東的資格以及權(quán)利等造成影響。第二章,主要分析表決權(quán)限制的合理性。首先,從不同類型的股權(quán)出發(fā),討論在出資瑕疵的情況下,是否應(yīng)對(duì)股東的某種類型的權(quán)利進(jìn)行限制。其次,深入剖析表決權(quán)的內(nèi)涵與特性,得出其屬于股東基礎(chǔ)性權(quán)利的結(jié)論,并分析其是否屬于應(yīng)當(dāng)限制的股權(quán)類型。再次,根據(jù)相關(guān)的法律原則、立法目的和章程約定等,從反面論述瑕疵出資股東行使完整的表決權(quán)缺乏正當(dāng)性。最后,從正面闡述限制股東表決權(quán)制度的積極作用。第三章,具體闡述由哪些主體提出對(duì)瑕疵出資股東進(jìn)行表決權(quán)限制,確定此類主體范圍的合理性和可行性;并且,按照由內(nèi)到外,從公司自治到法律強(qiáng)制的順序,提出通過(guò)章程、股東會(huì)決議以及法律法規(guī)等形式,對(duì)股東表決權(quán)進(jìn)行限制。第四章,結(jié)合法律規(guī)定以及公司自治等兩個(gè)層面,提出完善表決權(quán)限制制度的相關(guān)策略。同時(shí),為了做好限制表決權(quán)之后的銜接工作,給出了有關(guān)股東表決權(quán)的恢復(fù)和完善股東除名制度的合理化建議。
[Abstract]:In view of the more and more serious investment defects in reality, it is obvious that the traditional means, such as letting shareholders bear the corresponding default responsibility and repaying the contribution obligation, are not enough to solve the problem properly. If shareholders are to be better urged to make up their capital contributions in a timely manner, they should restrict their voting rights appropriately, weaken their right to speak in the course of the company's operation and management, and indirectly affect the profits they earn in the company and make them take the initiative to fulfill their contribution obligations. Safeguard the rights and interests of stakeholders such as the company and other shareholders. The purpose of this paper is to discuss whether the voting rights of shareholders with defective capital contribution should be restricted, and to provide corresponding countermeasures and suggestions for the specific ways of limitation. In the first chapter, the meaning and relevant types of defective capital contribution are discussed, and the influence of the defect on the qualification and rights of shareholders is discussed. The second chapter mainly analyzes the rationality of the restriction of voting rights. First of all, from different types of equity, the paper discusses whether shareholders' rights should be restricted in the case of defective capital contribution. Secondly, the connotation and characteristics of voting rights are deeply analyzed, and the conclusion that voting rights belong to the basic rights of shareholders is obtained, and whether they belong to the types of equity that should be restricted. Thirdly, according to the relevant legal principles, legislative purposes and articles of association, the negative side of the investment shareholders exercise the integrity of the voting rights is lack of legitimacy. Finally, the positive role of the system of restricting shareholders' voting rights is explained from a positive perspective. In chapter three, the author specifically states which subjects should limit the voting rights of defective shareholders, and determine the rationality and feasibility of the scope of such subjects; and according to the order from internal to external, from corporate autonomy to legal enforcement, Through articles of association, shareholders resolution and laws and regulations to limit the voting rights of shareholders. The fourth chapter, combining the legal provisions and corporate autonomy, puts forward the relevant strategies to perfect the voting rights restriction system. At the same time, in order to do a good job of linking up after restricting voting rights, this paper gives some reasonable suggestions on the restoration of shareholder voting rights and the perfection of shareholder delisting system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣東財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D922.291.91

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 林鵬程;;論瑕疵出資股東表決權(quán)的合理限制[J];吉林工商學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2016年03期

2 蔣國(guó)艷;;論瑕疵出資的股東權(quán)利及其限制[J];學(xué)術(shù)論壇;2013年10期

3 樊榮禧;;瑕疵出資股東的表決權(quán)的行使與限制[J];法律適用;2013年09期

4 郝磊;;瑕疵出資股東的權(quán)利限制[J];國(guó)家檢察官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2013年02期

5 王幽深;;論限制股東表決權(quán)的正當(dāng)性——兼評(píng)“公司法解釋三”第17條[J];學(xué)術(shù)交流;2013年02期

6 李亞卿;;瑕疵出資股東違約責(zé)任論[J];華北水利水電學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社科版);2012年04期

7 李建偉;;瑕疵出資股東的股東權(quán)利及其限制的分類研究:規(guī)范、解釋與實(shí)證[J];求是學(xué)刊;2012年01期

8 唐文娟;;論股東的表決權(quán)制度[J];知識(shí)經(jīng)濟(jì);2011年21期

9 孫簫;;我國(guó)瑕疵出資股權(quán)的限制問(wèn)題研究[J];南京農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年03期

10 鄧卷卷;;表決權(quán)代理征集制度研究[J];華中師范大學(xué)研究生學(xué)報(bào);2011年01期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 趙旭東;;違反出資義務(wù)的法律后果[N];人民法院報(bào);2002年

，

本文編號(hào)：1979166