本文選題：分時度假 + 格式條款��； 參考：《大連海事大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：分時度假作為一種新型的休閑消費(fèi)度假方式,一種新型的制度設(shè)計,起初在中國遇到諸多問題,但是隨著消費(fèi)者物質(zhì)條件的極大改善,消費(fèi)觀念的轉(zhuǎn)變,使得分時度假在中國會有大的發(fā)展空間。但是其遇到的障礙之一是法律制度的建構(gòu),本文即以建構(gòu)法律制度為目的展開研究。文章采取規(guī)范研究的方法,收集171例分時度假案例著手,以此為研究的基本素材進(jìn)行分析。文章分四章,第1章分時度假概述,介紹了分時度假的定義、法律特征、類型及其中涉及的法律關(guān)系,一方面使讀者對分時度假有一個基本認(rèn)識,另一方面確定文章的研究基調(diào),將分時度假作為一種消費(fèi)方式進(jìn)行研究。第2章分時度假在對案例數(shù)據(jù)簡單分析,得出其存在的法律問題。首先分時度假權(quán)益的法律性質(zhì)在實(shí)踐均是其為債權(quán),然債權(quán)對消費(fèi)者保護(hù)力度不夠,值得探討。其次格式條款問題,再次消費(fèi)者履約的風(fēng)險問題,第3章分時度假法律問題的法理分析,根據(jù)各個涉及的法律問題進(jìn)行法理分析。第4章對策和建議,針對分時度假的法律性質(zhì),筆者建議將其界定為用益物權(quán),建議是從現(xiàn)行法律體系中和制定專門法律規(guī)范對其進(jìn)行規(guī)制;針對格式條款問題,筆者建議從立法、行政、司法和社會四方面進(jìn)行控制;針對消費(fèi)者履約風(fēng)險的問題,筆者建議完善冷靜期、取消權(quán)制度,引入托管制度。最后是結(jié)論,對文章的內(nèi)容作以總結(jié),明確筆者觀點(diǎn)。
[Abstract]:Timeshare, as a new type of leisure vacation and a new system design, at first encountered many problems in China, but with the great improvement of the material conditions of consumers, the concept of consumption changed. So that timeshare in China will have a large space for development. But one of the obstacles is the construction of legal system. In this paper, 171 cases of timeshare are collected and analyzed. This paper is divided into four chapters. The first chapter introduces the definition, legal characteristics, types and legal relations of timeshare. On the one hand, it makes readers have a basic understanding of timeshare. On the other hand, to determine the tone of the article, time-sharing holiday as a consumption way to study. In chapter 2, the author analyzes the case data and finds out the legal problems. Firstly, the legal nature of timeshare rights is creditor's rights in practice, but the creditor's rights are not enough to protect consumers, so it is worth discussing. Secondly, the form clause problem, the consumer performance risk problem, the third chapter timeshare legal analysis of the legal issues, according to the legal issues involved in the legal analysis. In chapter 4, according to the legal nature of timeshare, the author proposes to define it as usufruct, to regulate it from the current legal system and to formulate special legal norms, and to deal with the problem of format clauses. The author suggests to control from four aspects of legislation, administration, judicature and society, and to perfect the cooling-off period, cancel the right system and introduce the trusteeship system in view of the problem of consumer performance risk. The last part is the conclusion, which summarizes the content of the article and clarifies the author's point of view.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：大連海事大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D922.294

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 袁春燕;關(guān)于在中國發(fā)展分時度假業(yè)的初步設(shè)想[J];理論學(xué)習(xí);2003年08期

2 汪傳才;;歐盟《分時度假指令》研究[J];河北法學(xué);2006年02期

3 周正義;;我國分時度假行業(yè)法律規(guī)制若干問題探討[J];中國海洋大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2011年04期

4 王麟;;分時度假——背起度假屋玩遍全世界[J];時代風(fēng)采;2001年07期

5 張辰 ,鄭海麗;以客為尊 打造分時度假村——記中國分時度假第一人徐昌東[J];w攣胖蕓，

本文編號：1891727