本文選題：商業(yè)賄賂 + 不正當(dāng)競爭��； 參考：《對(duì)外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：商業(yè)賄賂是市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)失調(diào)下常見的經(jīng)營者違法行為,屬于經(jīng)營者的不正當(dāng)競爭行為。我國法律主要通過《反不正當(dāng)競爭法》對(duì)其進(jìn)行相應(yīng)的規(guī)定,同時(shí)輔以刑法、《關(guān)于禁止商業(yè)賄賂行為的暫行規(guī)定》等部門規(guī)章作為補(bǔ)充。但由于法律界定不清,不同位階的規(guī)定不同,各界在解讀及適用時(shí)常常存在不一致、甚至沖突的局面。由于現(xiàn)行法律對(duì)商業(yè)賄賂的界定不清已經(jīng)在實(shí)際生活中產(chǎn)生了巨大的危害,因此,正確界定商業(yè)賄賂并進(jìn)行相關(guān)立法迫在眉睫。本文通過對(duì)工商、司法法律規(guī)范及學(xué)界對(duì)商業(yè)賄賂的認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)一一進(jìn)行闡述及分析,通過三個(gè)典型的商業(yè)賄賂案件比較分析行政執(zhí)法與司法對(duì)商業(yè)賄賂認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的差異,同時(shí)借鑒國外的相關(guān)法律規(guī)定、學(xué)術(shù)釋義,通過法理分析努力探尋商業(yè)賄賂的本質(zhì),并統(tǒng)一商業(yè)賄賂行為的認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。筆者得出商業(yè)賄賂的本質(zhì)其實(shí)是市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)的交易方通過利益交換的手段,獲取不正當(dāng)競爭優(yōu)勢(shì)的行為。結(jié)合商業(yè)賄賂的認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)我們可以給商業(yè)賄賂下一個(gè)較為完整、清晰的定義,即商業(yè)賄賂指的是市場(chǎng)交易的一方,通過向交易相對(duì)方及可能影響交易行為的其他平等主體給予利益,獲得不正當(dāng)?shù)母偁巸?yōu)勢(shì),造成或可能造成擾亂市場(chǎng)公平競爭秩序的行為。當(dāng)前正值1993年頒布的《反不正當(dāng)競爭法》第一次大的修訂,人大法制辦發(fā)布了《反不正當(dāng)競爭法(修訂草案)》。草案對(duì)現(xiàn)行法律的修改有很多可取之處,然而草案對(duì)商業(yè)賄賂的本質(zhì)界定仍存在一些問題。筆者結(jié)合本文對(duì)商業(yè)賄賂本質(zhì)及認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的探討和分析,對(duì)草案提出了一些修改和建議,以期解決商業(yè)賄賂實(shí)際存在的問題。
[Abstract]:Commercial bribery is a common illegal behavior of operators under the maladjustment of market economy, which belongs to the unfair competition behavior of operators. The law of our country mainly through the "Anti-unfair Competition Law" to its corresponding provisions, supplemented by the criminal law, "temporary provisions on the prohibition of commercial bribery" and other departmental regulations as a supplement. However, because the definition of law is not clear and the regulations of different levels are different, there are often inconsistent or even conflicting situations in interpretation and application. As the current law of commercial bribery has not clearly defined in the actual life has caused great harm, therefore, the correct definition of commercial bribery and the relevant legislation is urgent. This paper expounds and analyzes the commercial bribery standards of industry and commerce, judicial legal norms and academic circles, and compares and analyzes the differences between administrative law enforcement and judicial recognition standards of commercial bribery through three typical commercial bribery cases. At the same time draw lessons from the relevant laws and regulations of foreign countries, academic interpretation, through legal analysis to explore the nature of commercial bribery, and unify the standard of commercial bribery. The author comes to the conclusion that the essence of commercial bribery is the behavior of obtaining unfair competitive advantage by means of exchange of interests. We can give a relatively complete and clear definition of commercial bribery in the light of the criteria for the determination of commercial bribery, that is, commercial bribery refers to the party who trades in the market. By giving benefits to the opposite side of the transaction and other equal subjects which may affect the trading behavior, we can obtain unfair competitive advantage and cause or possibly cause the behavior of disturbing the order of fair competition in the market. At present, the first major amendment of the Anti-unfair Competition Law was promulgated in 1993, and the Law Office of the National people's Congress (NPC) issued the Anti-unfair Competition Law (revised draft). There are many merits in the amendment of the current law, but there are still some problems in defining the nature of commercial bribery in the draft. Based on the discussion and analysis of the essence and standard of commercial bribery, the author puts forward some amendments and suggestions to the draft, in order to solve the practical problems of commercial bribery.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：對(duì)外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D922.294

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 鄭友德;張欽坤;李薇薇;伍春艷;;對(duì)《反不正當(dāng)競爭法(修訂草案送審稿)》的修改建議[J];知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2016年06期

2 王俊林;;反不正當(dāng)競爭法修訂應(yīng)細(xì)化適用性[J];法人;2016年05期

3 楊超;;反不正當(dāng)競爭法視野下商業(yè)賄賂定性的兩重性——以廉潔義務(wù)與競爭秩序?yàn)橐暯荹J];中國市場(chǎng)監(jiān)管研究;2016年03期

4 岳平;曾崢;;從跨國藥企被處罰案看FCPA規(guī)制商業(yè)賄賂的域外經(jīng)驗(yàn)[J];河南警察學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2016年01期

5 林虎;;淺談醫(yī)藥行業(yè)中的商業(yè)折扣和現(xiàn)金折扣相關(guān)問題[J];中國鄉(xiāng)鎮(zhèn)企業(yè)會(huì)計(jì);2016年01期

6 孟雁北;;論我國反不正當(dāng)競爭法之修訂:包容、增減與細(xì)化[J];中國工商管理研究;2015年02期

7 方磊;;商業(yè)賄賂的概念與界定[J];新西部(理論版);2013年09期

8 劉淑敏;宋彭;;治理商業(yè)賄賂的法律環(huán)境探析[J];上海企業(yè);2006年12期

9 朱有明;張薛梅;;我國商業(yè)賄賂現(xiàn)狀的經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)分析[J];商場(chǎng)現(xiàn)代化;2006年08期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 顧謝榮;工商行政管理部門治理商業(yè)賄賂的困境及對(duì)策研究[D];揚(yáng)州大學(xué);2015年

2 趙輝;反不正當(dāng)競爭法視角下商業(yè)賄賂行為研究[D];吉林財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2014年

3 歐煜根;商業(yè)賄賂行為法律規(guī)制研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2012年

4 鄭雪嵐;商業(yè)賄賂的表現(xiàn)及法律規(guī)制問題研究[D];南昌大學(xué);2012年

5 赫長虹;論我國商業(yè)賄賂行為的法律認(rèn)定[D];對(duì)外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué);2006年

，

本文編號(hào)：1884793