本文選題：中國自貿(mào)試驗區(qū) + 法治建構�。� 參考：《國際貿(mào)易問題》2017年01期

【摘要】：法治建構是中國自貿(mào)試驗區(qū)改革創(chuàng)新的決定性因素。當下中國自貿(mào)試驗區(qū)法治建構模式本質上屬于"自主推動型法治建構模式"。"市人大常委會授權立法→市政府‘1+X’規(guī)則群→市人大常委會條例三步走"的法治創(chuàng)新路徑成為可復制和可推廣的法治創(chuàng)新經(jīng)驗的"上海模式"的最重要內(nèi)容,同時成為3年以來上海自貿(mào)試驗區(qū)改革創(chuàng)新探索的最大亮點。中國自貿(mào)試驗區(qū)法治創(chuàng)新路徑及法治建構的"應然模式"是"國家層面統(tǒng)一立法的基本法模式",而"實然模式"是"國家授權、部委規(guī)章、地方立法三層次聯(lián)動推進模式"。"實然模式"的最大成效是主要解決了"凡屬重大改革都要于法有據(jù)"這一政治課題,但該模式存在三方面缺陷(無法適應深層次改革創(chuàng)新任務、不具有可持續(xù)性、價值取向模糊),在實踐中遭遇了"四化難題"(行政化、地方化、碎片化、空洞化),對制度創(chuàng)新的促進作用不夠顯著,無法實現(xiàn)可持續(xù)發(fā)展。因此,亟需探尋一條介于"應然模式"與"實然模式"之間的中間路徑,并努力構建一種對中國自貿(mào)試驗區(qū)改革創(chuàng)新具有實質性法治保障意義的"過渡性模式"。建議采用"特別授權法模式",即由全國人大常委會制定"中華人民共和國自由貿(mào)易園(港)區(qū)特別授權法"。
[Abstract]:The construction of rule of law is the decisive factor in the reform and innovation of China's free trade experimental area. At present, the construction mode of rule of law in China's free trade experimental area is essentially a "self-propelled construction mode of rule of law". The standing Committee of the Municipal people's Congress has authorized the government to legislate on the three-step rule of law innovation of the Municipal people's Congress standing Committee regulations. The "Shanghai Model", which can be replicated and popularized, has become the most important part of the "Shanghai Model" for replicating and popularizing the experience of innovation in the rule of law. At the same time, it has become the biggest bright spot of the reform and innovation exploration in Shanghai Free Trade Test Zone in the past 3 years. The innovation path of the rule of law and the construction of the rule of law in China's free trade experimental area are "the basic law model of unified legislation at the national level", while the "realistic mode" is the "three levels of coordinated promotion mode of state authorization, ministerial regulations and local legislation". The biggest effect of the real model is that it has mainly solved the political issue of "all major reforms must be based on law and evidence", but the model has three defects (unable to adapt to the deep reform and innovation task, and not sustainable). The value orientation is vague, encountered in practice "the four modernizations difficult problem" (administration, localization, fragmentation, hollowness), the promotion function to the system innovation is not obvious enough, unable to realize the sustainable development. Therefore, it is urgent to explore a middle path between "supposed mode" and "real mode", and try to construct a "transitional mode" which is of substantial significance for the reform and innovation of China's free trade experimental area. It is suggested that the "special authorization law model" be adopted, that is, the "special authorization law of the people's Republic of China for free trade park (Hong Kong)" should be formulated by the standing Committee of the National people's Congress.
【作者單位】： 浙江工業(yè)大學法學院、浙江省法學會自由貿(mào)易園(港)區(qū)法治研究中心;
【基金】：2014年度國家社科基金重點項目“中美經(jīng)貿(mào)關系中的國有企業(yè)問題研究”(14AGJ012) 2014年教育部人文社會科學青年基金項目“上海自貿(mào)區(qū)金融消費糾紛多元解決機制的構建”(14YJC820035) 2015年教育部人文社會科學青年基金項目“自由貿(mào)易園(港)區(qū)國際航運法律制度研究及對浙江的借鑒”(15YJC820066) 2016年度浙江省法學會重點項目“浙江舟山自貿(mào)試驗區(qū)改革創(chuàng)新與法治保障研究”(2016NA14);2016年度浙江省法學會重點項目“自貿(mào)區(qū)行政監(jiān)管與法律完善”(2016NA20)
【分類號】：D922.295;F752.8

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 包志偉,陳國裕;對制度創(chuàng)新路徑的歷史和現(xiàn)實的理性思考[J];中共浙江省委黨校學報;2002年03期

2 高薇;;法的創(chuàng)新路徑的生物學啟示[J];現(xiàn)代商貿(mào)工業(yè);2007年04期

3 張弦;王浩宇;;法的生物工程——法的創(chuàng)新路徑的生物學啟示[J];華商;2008年16期

4 張歡;陸奇斌;王新松;;社會管理創(chuàng)新路徑研究[J];中國行政管理;2012年01期

5 賈會遠;;民營企業(yè)自主創(chuàng)新路徑探討[J];人民論壇;2012年32期

6 姜華 ,婁偉;我國傳統(tǒng)產(chǎn)業(yè)的創(chuàng)新路徑[J];w攣胖蕓，

本文編號：1876630