本文選題：海事主管機(jī)關(guān) + 強(qiáng)制干預(yù)行為　； 參考：《大連海事大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：實踐中海事主管機(jī)關(guān)應(yīng)對、處理海上事故,在維護(hù)海上交通安全、保護(hù)海洋環(huán)境方面發(fā)揮著不可忽視的作用,具體表現(xiàn)為強(qiáng)制清污、強(qiáng)制打撈清除和強(qiáng)制拖帶等帶有一定公法性質(zhì)的行為,本文將上述行為統(tǒng)稱為海事主管機(jī)關(guān)的“強(qiáng)制干預(yù)行為”。本文試圖分析海事主管機(jī)關(guān)強(qiáng)制干預(yù)行為的相關(guān)法律問題。第一章對海事主管機(jī)關(guān)基于公共利益進(jìn)行強(qiáng)制干預(yù)行為的特點及法律依據(jù)進(jìn)行了概括說明；第二章著重研究海事主管機(jī)關(guān)強(qiáng)制干預(yù)行為的法律性質(zhì),通過將其與國家主管機(jī)關(guān)從事和控制的海難救助、強(qiáng)制救助進(jìn)行對比分析,確認(rèn)了其行政代履行的公法性質(zhì)；第三章主要分析海事主管機(jī)關(guān)強(qiáng)制干預(yù)行為的條件、邊界及違法干預(yù)的賠償?shù)葐栴},以圖保障行政相對人的合法權(quán)益；第四章則重點討論了海事強(qiáng)制干預(yù)行為所產(chǎn)生的費用的性質(zhì)以及如何實現(xiàn)問題,并對其后續(xù)保障提出了意見和建議�？傊�,本文旨在厘清海事主管機(jī)關(guān)強(qiáng)制干預(yù)行為與其從事和控制的海難救助之間的關(guān)系,并且指出海事主管機(jī)關(guān)的這種公法性行為不宜被稱為“強(qiáng)制救助”,更不應(yīng)放入海難救助法律關(guān)系中調(diào)整,而應(yīng)列入海事行政強(qiáng)制體系中進(jìn)行考察。同時,本文還研究了海事主管機(jī)關(guān)在什么條件下可以實施強(qiáng)制干預(yù)行為以及如何實施、權(quán)力界限何在等問題,并對實踐中經(jīng)常引起爭議的費用實現(xiàn)問題提出了建議,希望本文的研究結(jié)論能夠使海事主管機(jī)關(guān)與相對人的權(quán)益得到平衡。
[Abstract]:In practice, maritime authorities should deal with accidents at sea and play an important role in maintaining maritime traffic safety and protecting marine environment. Compulsory salvage removal and compulsory towing are some public law acts, which are referred to as "compulsory intervention" by maritime authorities in this paper. This paper attempts to analyze the relevant legal issues of compulsory intervention by maritime authorities. The first chapter summarizes the characteristics and legal basis of compulsory intervention by maritime authorities on the basis of public interest. The second chapter focuses on the legal nature of compulsory intervention by maritime authorities. By comparing it with the salvage at sea engaged in and under the control of the competent national authority, the compulsory salvage confirms the public law nature of its administrative performance. Chapter III mainly analyzes the conditions for the compulsory intervention by the maritime competent authority. In order to protect the legitimate rights and interests of the administrative counterpart, the fourth chapter focuses on the nature of the cost incurred by the maritime compulsory intervention and how to realize it. And put forward the opinion and suggestion to its follow-up safeguard. In a word, the purpose of this paper is to clarify the relationship between the compulsory intervention of maritime authorities and the salvage at sea which they engage in and control, and to point out that such public law acts of maritime authorities should not be called "compulsory salvage". It should not be adjusted in the legal relationship of salvage at sea, but should be included in the compulsory system of maritime administration. At the same time, this paper also studies the conditions under which maritime authorities can carry out compulsory intervention, how to implement it, and where the limits of power are, and puts forward some suggestions on how to realize the costs that often cause controversy in practice. It is hoped that the conclusion of this paper can balance the rights and interests of the maritime authorities and the relative parties.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：大連海事大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D922.294

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 譚振宏;鄭中義;;中國海上強(qiáng)制救助的研究(英文)[J];大連海事大學(xué)學(xué)報;2007年S2期

2 趙立棟;;淺析海事行政強(qiáng)制中的“代履行”[J];中國海事;2008年11期

3 張曉慧;杜川;;船舶事故污染應(yīng)急行動相關(guān)法律問題[J];世界海運;2008年03期

4 于杰;;淺析海難強(qiáng)制救助中救助款項的法律性質(zhì)[J];人民論壇;2013年11期

5 應(yīng)松年;論行政強(qiáng)制執(zhí)行[J];中國法學(xué);1998年03期

6 劉剛仿;;中國海難救助客體法律制度的梳理與完善——兼議中國海商法相關(guān)制度的修改[J];中國海商法年刊;2011年03期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 趙月林;殘骸強(qiáng)制打撈清除法律制度之研究[D];大連海事大學(xué);2007年

2 于杰;國家主管機(jī)關(guān)海難救助法律問題研究[D];大連海事大學(xué);2013年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 劉勐;海事行政強(qiáng)制法律問題研究[D];大連海事大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號：1857406