本文選題：船舶優(yōu)先權(quán) + 船舶法定抵押權(quán)��； 參考：《山東大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：我國《海商法》中關(guān)于船舶優(yōu)先權(quán)的規(guī)定,是根據(jù)國際慣例,并參照1993年《船舶優(yōu)先權(quán)和抵押權(quán)國際公約》制定的,旨在保證債權(quán)人依法提出的特殊海事請(qǐng)求,對(duì)產(chǎn)生該海事請(qǐng)求的船舶,享有優(yōu)先受償?shù)臋?quán)利。然而由于法律傳統(tǒng)和法律體系的不同,船舶優(yōu)先權(quán)作為Maritime Lien在我國相對(duì)應(yīng)的法律概念和法律制度,以其概念為核心,引發(fā)了諸多誤解和爭議。因此,本文從Maritime Lien的緣起和發(fā)展出發(fā),探究Maritime Lien的本意和性質(zhì),結(jié)合船舶優(yōu)先權(quán)制度在我國法律土壤上所帶來的問題和原因,提出“船舶法定抵押權(quán)”這個(gè)替換概念,來解決船舶優(yōu)先權(quán)帶來的問題,澄清誤解,更好地實(shí)現(xiàn)其制度本身的價(jià)值和功能。第一部分研究船舶優(yōu)先權(quán)的緣起,從英美法系制度和國際條約中探究Maritime Lien的性質(zhì)；第二部分分析船舶優(yōu)先權(quán)概念在中國法律領(lǐng)域所帶來的立法、司法、學(xué)術(shù)交流中的爭議和問題；第三部分闡述“船舶法定抵押權(quán)”對(duì)于解決這些問題的優(yōu)越性價(jià)值；第四部分闡述立法者引入船舶優(yōu)先權(quán)概念的初衷,進(jìn)一步說明“船舶法定抵押權(quán)”對(duì)于替代船舶優(yōu)先權(quán)并無實(shí)質(zhì)障礙；第五部分對(duì)于我國立法和司法程序提出建議,希望能夠?yàn)椤逗Ｉ谭ā返男薷奶峁┮恍﹩⑹竞蛶椭?br/>[Abstract]:The provisions on maritime liens in China's Maritime Law are formulated in accordance with international practice and with reference to the 1993 International Convention on Maritime liens and mortgages, in order to guarantee the special maritime claims submitted by creditors in accordance with the law. The ship in which the maritime claim arises shall have the right of priority. However, due to the difference between legal tradition and legal system, maritime lien, as the corresponding legal concept and legal system of Maritime Lien in China, takes its concept as the core, which leads to many misunderstandings and disputes. Therefore, starting from the origin and development of Maritime Lien, this paper probes into the original intention and nature of Maritime Lien, combines the problems and reasons brought about by the maritime lien system in our country's legal soil, and puts forward the replacement concept of "legal mortgage on ships". To solve the problems caused by maritime liens, clarify misunderstandings, and better realize the value and function of the system itself. The first part studies the origin of maritime lien, explores the nature of Maritime Lien from the Anglo-American legal system and international treaties, the second part analyzes the legislation and judicature brought about by the concept of maritime lien in the field of Chinese law. The third part expounds the superiority value of "legal mortgage of ship" in solving these problems, the fourth part expounds the original intention of introducing the concept of maritime lien. It is further explained that there is no substantial obstacle to the substitution of maritime liens by "statutory mortgage on ships", and in the fifth part, some suggestions are put forward for the legislative and judicial procedures of our country, hoping to provide some enlightenment and help for the amendment of Maritime Law.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D922.294

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 王全弟,丁潔;物權(quán)法應(yīng)確立優(yōu)先權(quán)制度——圍繞合同法第286條之爭議[J];法學(xué);2001年04期

2 謝新勝;;船舶優(yōu)先權(quán)的法律適用規(guī)則[J];華中農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年05期

3 高峰;;船舶留置權(quán)與船舶優(yōu)先權(quán)順位之思考[J];黑龍江省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年03期

4 李東;李天生;;船舶優(yōu)先權(quán)源流考[J];中國海商法研究;2013年01期

，

本文編號(hào)：1847432