本文選題：行業(yè)協(xié)會 + 限制競爭��； 參考：《河南師范大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：伴隨著我國市場經(jīng)濟的發(fā)展和完善，行業(yè)協(xié)會在我國也經(jīng)歷了從無到有，再到逐步完善的發(fā)展歷程。我們也逐漸認識到行業(yè)協(xié)會是把雙刃劍，它不僅具有促進市場競爭的能力，也具有限制市場競爭的威脅。我國對行業(yè)協(xié)會限制競爭行為的研究起步較晚，導(dǎo)致我國法律對此的規(guī)制也比較薄弱，《反壟斷法》中只是粗略的提到了行業(yè)協(xié)會，并沒有對其進行詳細的規(guī)范。在行業(yè)協(xié)會地位日益凸顯的今天，為了適應(yīng)經(jīng)濟全球化的趨勢，我們必須完善對行業(yè)協(xié)會的法律規(guī)制，規(guī)范行業(yè)協(xié)會行為，以加快我國市場經(jīng)濟健康發(fā)展的步伐。本文以“論行業(yè)協(xié)會限制競爭行為的法律規(guī)制”為題，運用實證研究和比較研究等方法，對行業(yè)協(xié)會限制競爭行為問題進行了初步探討，并提出了一些建議。 本文分為五個部分： 第一部分主要介紹了行業(yè)協(xié)會的相關(guān)概念，包括行業(yè)協(xié)會的定義，以及非營利性、非政府性和中間性等特征，同時也簡單介紹了行業(yè)協(xié)會對市場競爭的作用，包括對市場競爭的促進作用和限制作用。 第二部分是行業(yè)協(xié)會限制競爭行為的概念和特征以及表現(xiàn)形式。行業(yè)協(xié)會限制競爭行為的表現(xiàn)形式主要是固定價格、信息交換、標準化認證和集體抵制等形式，這些形式都表現(xiàn)了行業(yè)協(xié)會限制競爭行為的主體特殊性、行為隱蔽性、后果嚴重性的特點。 第三部分從我國的實際出發(fā)，介紹了我國行業(yè)協(xié)會限制競爭行為的特點，以及我國法律對其規(guī)制的現(xiàn)狀和其中存在的問題。由于我國目前存在行業(yè)協(xié)會具有一定的“二政府”性，因此它在實施限制競爭行為時往往會有一些行政力量的參與。目前我國并沒有規(guī)專門制行業(yè)協(xié)會的法律，現(xiàn)有的法律在對行業(yè)協(xié)會進行規(guī)制時也存在有一定問題，如對行業(yè)協(xié)會沒有做出明確界定，行業(yè)協(xié)會的法律責(zé)任設(shè)定也不完善等。 第四部分主要通過對國外行業(yè)協(xié)會限制競爭行為法律規(guī)制的介紹，可以使我們從中借鑒一些經(jīng)驗。首先介紹了國際上認定行業(yè)協(xié)會限制競爭行為違法的原則，然后介紹了美國、德國、日本等國家對行業(yè)協(xié)會限制競爭行為的法律規(guī)制模式，最后從行政、民事、刑事三方面介紹了其他國家在法律責(zé)任上的設(shè)定。 第五部分對完善我國行業(yè)協(xié)會限制競爭行為的法律規(guī)制提出了幾點建議。從總體上來看，我們可以制定專門的《行業(yè)協(xié)會法》，以便對行業(yè)協(xié)會進行全面規(guī)制；也可以制定反壟斷法的實施細則或指南，在其中對行業(yè)協(xié)會的限制競爭行為作出明確的規(guī)定。無論是采用哪種方式，我們都必須要明確界定行業(yè)協(xié)會的范疇，完善其三大責(zé)任體系。
[Abstract]:With the development and perfection of China's market economy, trade associations have also experienced a process of development from scratch to gradual improvement. We have come to realize that trade association is a double-edged sword, which not only has the ability to promote market competition, but also has the threat of restricting market competition. The research of restricting competition behavior of trade association in our country started late, which led to the weak regulation of the trade association in our country. The Anti-monopoly Law only roughly mentioned the trade association, and did not regulate it in detail. In order to adapt to the trend of economic globalization, we must perfect the legal regulation and regulate the behavior of trade associations in order to speed up the healthy development of market economy in our country. Based on the topic of "on the legal Regulation of Trade Association's restrictive competitive behavior", this paper makes a preliminary discussion on the issue of Trade Association's restrictive competitive behavior by means of empirical research and comparative study, and puts forward some suggestions. This paper is divided into five parts: The first part mainly introduces the related concepts of trade associations, including the definition of trade associations, as well as the non-profit, non-governmental and intermediate characteristics, and also briefly introduces the role of trade associations in market competition. Including the promotion of market competition and the role of restrictions. The second part is the concept, characteristics and manifestation of restrictive competition behavior of trade association. The main forms of restrictive competition behavior of trade association are fixed price, information exchange, standardized authentication and collective boycott. These forms all show the particularity of the main body of the trade association restricting competition behavior, the behavior is hidden. The seriousness of the consequences. The third part introduces the characteristics of the restrictive competition behavior of China's trade associations, the current situation of our country's legal regulation and the existing problems from the point of view of the reality of our country. Due to the existence of trade associations in our country, there are two governments, so it often involves some administrative forces in the process of restricting competition. At present, our country does not have the law of specialized trade association, the existing law also has certain problems in regulating the trade association, for example, there is no clear definition of the trade association, and the legal responsibility of the trade association is not perfect, and so on. The fourth part mainly through the introduction of the foreign trade association restriction competition behavior legal regulation, may enable us to draw lessons from some experience. First of all, it introduces the principles of international recognition of the illegality of restrictive competition behavior of trade associations, and then introduces the legal regulation models of trade associations restricting competition behavior in the United States, Germany, Japan and other countries, finally, from the administrative, civil, civil, etc. Three aspects of criminal law introduced the legal liability of other countries. In the fifth part, some suggestions are put forward to perfect the legal regulation of restrictive competition behavior of China's trade associations. In general, we can formulate a special Trade Association Act to regulate trade associations in a comprehensive way, and we can also formulate detailed rules or guidelines for the implementation of the anti-monopoly law. In which the trade association to limit competition behavior made clear provisions. In either way, we must clearly define the scope of trade associations and perfect their three responsibility systems.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河南師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D922.294

【參考文獻】

中國期刊全文數(shù)據(jù)庫 前10條

1 侯雪梅;;反壟斷法視野中的行業(yè)協(xié)會[J];北方論叢;2008年04期

2 鄭鵬程;美國反壟斷法“本身違法”與“合理法則”適用范圍探討[J];河北法學(xué);2005年10期

3 義海忠;鄭艷馨;;對我國行業(yè)協(xié)會性質(zhì)錯位的思考[J];河北法學(xué);2008年03期

4 高娟;;行業(yè)協(xié)會在區(qū)域合作中的作用及其立法完善——基于環(huán)渤海區(qū)域合作的考察[J];經(jīng)濟論壇;2009年03期

5 梁上上;論行業(yè)協(xié)會的反競爭行為[J];法學(xué)研究;1998年04期

6 徐楠;楊輝;;行業(yè)協(xié)會限制競爭行為法律責(zé)任制度研究[J];學(xué)理論;2010年02期

7 《社會主義市場經(jīng)濟體制下的行業(yè)管理》課題組;市場經(jīng)濟發(fā)達國家的行業(yè)組織和政府的行業(yè)管理[J];國家行政學(xué)院學(xué)報;2002年06期

8 石宏英;日本行業(yè)協(xié)會對企業(yè)的信息情報功能與經(jīng)濟功能[J];日本問題研究;2000年01期

9 魯籬;周道樹;;論我國行業(yè)協(xié)會集體抵制行為的反壟斷法規(guī)制[J];天府新論;2008年03期

10 楊輝;劉世寬;;大型零售商限制競爭行為的法律規(guī)制[J];行政與法;2008年02期

，

本文編號：1831057