本文選題：海域上權(quán)利群 + 海域使用權(quán)��； 參考：《大連海事大學(xué)》2016年博士論文

【摘要】：我國(guó)現(xiàn)行法采用的是在客體上將海域與蘊(yùn)藏于海域的自然資源完全分離的立法技術(shù),由此使得我國(guó)海域上權(quán)利群體系的構(gòu)建方式具有鮮明的中國(guó)特色。文章主要以解釋論的視角,在對(duì)現(xiàn)行法進(jìn)行全面梳理的基礎(chǔ)上,力圖描繪出我國(guó)海域上權(quán)利群體系的整體脈絡(luò),而后在此框架下,對(duì)權(quán)利群體系中的權(quán)利及各權(quán)利間的關(guān)系進(jìn)行梳理,最終將研究的結(jié)果反饋于修法之建議。論文共分五章：第一章剖析了海域上權(quán)利群的基本理論。具體界定了海域上權(quán)利群的含義及其存在區(qū)域；在整體上比較了海域上的權(quán)利與土地上的權(quán)利；以海域與蘊(yùn)藏于海域的自然資源在客體上之分離為思維進(jìn)路,劃分出了海域上權(quán)利群體系的兩個(gè)子體系。第二章探討了海域上權(quán)利群的客體。在對(duì)海域的客體地位進(jìn)行論述的過(guò)程中,文章采用了歷史分析的方法對(duì)海域的歷史形態(tài)進(jìn)行了研究；通過(guò)法解釋學(xué)方法站在解釋論的立場(chǎng)上討論了我國(guó)海域的客體地位。在對(duì)自然資源的客體地位進(jìn)行研究時(shí),重點(diǎn)分析了三個(gè)方面的內(nèi)容,一是自然資源的獨(dú)立客體地位；二是自然資源的特定性；三是作為權(quán)利客體的自然資源與構(gòu)成自然資源之個(gè)體的區(qū)別。第三章解析了以海域?yàn)榭腕w的子權(quán)利群之構(gòu)成。以海域?yàn)榭腕w的子權(quán)利群由海域所有權(quán)、海域使用權(quán)、填海權(quán)、養(yǎng)殖漁業(yè)權(quán)、海域租賃權(quán)、海域承包經(jīng)營(yíng)權(quán)、海域役權(quán)、海域抵押權(quán)所組成,我國(guó)法將其中的填海權(quán)與養(yǎng)殖漁業(yè)權(quán)歸入海域使用權(quán)范疇。該章所關(guān)注的是以海域?yàn)榭腕w的子權(quán)利群的整體布局,以及子權(quán)利群中各權(quán)利之客體及性質(zhì)的界定。文章第四章闡釋了以自然資源為客體的子權(quán)利群之構(gòu)成�，F(xiàn)階段,我國(guó)法律層面的海域上之自然資源唯有漁業(yè)資源與礦產(chǎn)資源兩種。漁業(yè)資源所有權(quán)與礦產(chǎn)資源所有權(quán)均為國(guó)家所享有的所有權(quán),捕撈漁業(yè)權(quán)與礦業(yè)權(quán)分別是以漁業(yè)資源與礦產(chǎn)資源為客體的物權(quán)性質(zhì)的準(zhǔn)物權(quán),礦業(yè)權(quán)之租賃權(quán)與礦業(yè)權(quán)之抵押權(quán)均是在礦業(yè)權(quán)上設(shè)立的權(quán)利,上述權(quán)利共同構(gòu)成了海域上的以自然資源為客體的子權(quán)利群。第五章研究了海域上權(quán)利群中各權(quán)利的關(guān)系及協(xié)調(diào)。該章不僅分析了以海域?yàn)榭腕w的子權(quán)利群內(nèi)部各權(quán)利的關(guān)系及協(xié)調(diào),探討了以自然資源為客體的子權(quán)利群內(nèi)部各權(quán)利的關(guān)系及協(xié)調(diào),還對(duì)兩個(gè)子權(quán)利群間各權(quán)利的關(guān)系進(jìn)行了論述。
[Abstract]:The current law of our country adopts the legislative technique of separating the sea area completely from the natural resources contained in the sea area, which makes the construction of the right group system in the sea area of our country have distinct Chinese characteristics. Based on the comprehensive analysis of the current law, this paper tries to describe the whole context of the system of rights groups in the sea area of our country from the perspective of the theory of explanation, and then under this framework, Combing the rights in the system of right groups and the relationship between the rights, the results of the study are fed back to the suggestion of amending the law. The thesis is divided into five chapters: the first chapter analyzes the basic theory of the rights group in the sea area. It specifically defines the meaning of the rights group in the sea area and its existence area, compares the rights in the sea area with the rights on the land as a whole, takes the separation of the sea area from the natural resources in the sea area as the way of thinking. Two subsystems of the right group system in the sea area are divided. The second chapter discusses the object of the right group in the sea area. In the course of discussing the object status of the sea area, the paper studies the historical form of the sea area by using the method of historical analysis, and discusses the object status of the sea area of our country from the standpoint of interpretation theory through the method of legal hermeneutics. In the study of the object status of natural resources, the author focuses on three aspects: one is the independent object status of natural resources, the other is the specificity of natural resources. The third is the difference between natural resources as the object of right and individuals that constitute natural resources. The third chapter analyzes the composition of the sub-rights group which takes the sea area as the object. The sub-rights group, which takes the sea area as the object, consists of the ownership of the sea area, the right to use the sea area, the right to fill the sea, the right to culture and fishery, the right to lease the sea area, the right to contract and manage the sea area, the right of sea area servitude, the right The right of reclamation and the right of aquaculture and fishery are classified as the right to use the sea area by Chinese law. This chapter focuses on the overall layout of the sub-rights group, and the definition of the object and nature of the rights in the sub-rights group. The fourth chapter explains the composition of the sub-rights group, which takes the natural resources as the object. At present, there are only two kinds of natural resources in the legal level of our country: fishery resources and mineral resources. Both the ownership of fishery resources and the ownership of mineral resources are owned by the state. Fishing fishery rights and mining rights are quasi-real rights with the object of fishery resources and mineral resources, respectively. Both the lease right of mining right and the mortgage right of mining right are the rights established on mining right. These rights together form the sub-rights group of natural resources in the sea area. The fifth chapter studies the relationship and coordination of the rights in the rights groups in the sea area. This chapter not only analyzes the relationship and coordination of various rights within the sub-rights group with the sea area as the object, but also probes into the relationship and coordination of the rights within the sub-rights group with the natural resources as the object. The relationship between the two rights groups is also discussed.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：大連海事大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D922.294

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 譚論;王倩;田洪軍;;海域使用權(quán)抵押發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀、問(wèn)題及對(duì)策[J];海洋開(kāi)發(fā)與管理;2015年10期

2 李志文;劉文釗;;國(guó)家主權(quán)視閾下的無(wú)居民海島所有權(quán)[J];社會(huì)科學(xué)輯刊;2014年05期

3 余果;;國(guó)外礦業(yè)權(quán)與土地使用權(quán)關(guān)系簡(jiǎn)析[J];國(guó)土資源情報(bào);2014年07期

4 BORIS STRAUCH;ANASTASIYA KOROLCHENKO;代海軍;;德國(guó)、法國(guó)、俄羅斯和日本礦業(yè)法的共同點(diǎn)與區(qū)別[J];華北科技學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2014年06期

5 曹宇;;礦業(yè)權(quán)登記的理論反思與修正面向[J];河北法學(xué);2014年05期

6 康紀(jì)田;;礦業(yè)法不應(yīng)允許礦業(yè)權(quán)出租的三條理由[J];中國(guó)煤炭;2013年11期

7 胡家強(qiáng);劉洋;;海域使用權(quán)抵押擔(dān)保法律問(wèn)題探析[J];中國(guó)海洋大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2013年03期

8 李顯冬;楊城;;關(guān)于《礦產(chǎn)資源法》修改的若干問(wèn)題[J];中國(guó)國(guó)土資源經(jīng)濟(jì);2013年04期

9 尹田;;抵押權(quán)效力若干問(wèn)題研究[J];河南財(cái)經(jīng)政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2013年01期

10 王興勝;;認(rèn)真對(duì)待海域物權(quán)——以我國(guó)海域役權(quán)制度的構(gòu)建為視角[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2012年12期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前2條

1 康紀(jì)田;;重構(gòu)礦產(chǎn)資源產(chǎn)權(quán)制度[A];生態(tài)文明法制建設(shè)——2014年全國(guó)環(huán)境資源法學(xué)研討會(huì)（年會(huì)）論文集（第一冊(cè)）[C];2014年

2 鄭瀛;;填海造地法律性質(zhì)研究 從我國(guó)首例不服非法用海行政處罰案談起[A];中國(guó)海洋學(xué)會(huì)2005年學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文匯編[C];2005年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 劉凡勇;;采礦權(quán)的承包、出租與抵押[N];中國(guó)礦業(yè)報(bào);2013年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前6條

1 陳儀;自然資源國(guó)家所有權(quán)的公權(quán)性質(zhì)研究[D];蘇州大學(xué);2015年

2 歐陽(yáng)君君;自然資源特許使用的理論建構(gòu)與制度規(guī)范[D];蘇州大學(xué);2015年

3 黃萍;自然資源使用權(quán)制度研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2012年

4 于會(huì)國(guó);中國(guó)捕撈限額制度研究[D];中國(guó)海洋大學(xué);2009年

5 黃軍;國(guó)家所有權(quán)行使論[D];武漢大學(xué);2005年

6 崔鳳友;海域使用權(quán)制度之研究[D];中國(guó)海洋大學(xué);2004年

，

本文編號(hào)：1823940